Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Bad Polemics Against the Papacy Will Include Anti-Fascism


Is the Pope From God or From Men? The Case Against Rome | Mike Gendron
Philippians 1:9 Ministries | 30 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do75NfgAkLM


Three remarks.

1) You didn't even bother to look at verse 19, where "thee" clearly refers to Peter. And with a language making him parallel to Eliacim.
2) You didn't note that the Church was founded on a rock and doesn't just consist of individuals, but regardless of leadership type is an institution, a stable community.
3) You feature personal immorality as non-leadership, like as if James [VI and] I's presumably sodomitic affairs had made him non-king, and add three authors, one of whom is a very recent modernist, adept of Vatican II, one of whom was a dropout in school, but presumably still correct on the historic facts, and one of whom takes support of Fascism, any kind, not just NSDAP, if you call that a Fascism, as a clear moral failure.

On the last point:

Who were the chief traitors to the cause of democratic civilization? Catholic France — that is to say, the Catholic and Pope-directed part of France, Belgium (or its Fascists, royalists, and priests), and the Catholic Croats of Yugo-Slavia.

Who made the best fight against the invading Huns? Norway, which has only 2000 Catholics to nearly 3,000,000 Protestants; the Serbs, who are bitterly anti-Papal and were let down by the Catholic provinces of their country; Greece, where the Pope has no influence; and Russia, where, if you will forgive in Irishism, he has still less. Not for a moment do I belittle the fine resistance of Poland, but it was not fighting Fascism as such. It was already Fascist and had for twenty years persecuted religious minorities. It fought for its national independence and to prevent the extension to Poland of the anti-clerical elements of Nazism.


He could have added Austria to Poland, except Austria, to avoid a bloodbath, didn't fight in 1938. Previously it had both fired on and executed NSDAP.

McCabe argues as if adherence to Democracy (including apparently Communism) were a moral duty and adherence or even alliance with a Fascism, any of them, were a moral failure.

To some who consider each and every one of the non-NSDAP Fascisms as "NSDAP lite", no, not the case. Italy was certainly not the purest, but even there sth like Aktion T-4 would have been and for the ventennio was unthinkable. Also, given Gipsies were trying to enter Italy in 1926, 100 years ago, and Mussolini blocked their entry in that year, it's obvious Gipsies were not oppressed in the early parts of the ventennio. After that block, I'm not sure if all caravans were targetted or just those drawn by horses ... given Mussolini's alliance with Fiat, that's a possibility. But even if not, even if he tried to force them to live in one place, democratic régimes, including Norway which McCabe praised, have oppressed them far worse than that.

So where does McCabe find in the Bible that Democracy is a duty and Fascism a sin? He doesn't.

(Clarification on Mussolini's block and the targetting of caravans, two different but connected stories. Legally, from Mussolini's side, foreign gipsies could no longer enter. In administration, from a chief police, gypsy caravans were targetted. And I'm not sure how much or why or what came of it, but I suspect it was a long term project and even in 1937, when gipsies were transferred from Istria to Sardinia, some gipsies, though fewer, were still roaming around in caravans. And those in Istria got to take their caravans with them, whether horse drawn or motored.)




One more.

This is he that was in the church in the wilderness, with the angel who spoke to him on mount Sina, and with our fathers; who received the words of life to give unto us
[Acts Of Apostles 7:38]


No proof that the word "church" or ecclesia doesn't mean an institution.

We simply say, that was the Jewish Church, a perfectly legitimate (up to Caiaphas the night to Good Friday) precursor of the Catholic Church.

This also shows why Jesus could rebuke Peter a few verses later, since the Catholic Church was not yet founded as such at this moment. Cephas didn't become the first Pope of the New Covenant while (Hannas or) Caiaphas (or someone) was the last (or second last) Pope of the Old Covenant.

Christine Niles with John Salza and I Take Distance from SSPX, from Different Positions


She's OK with Vatican II, I'm a Conclavist. First an afterthought from today, then my original comments from yesterday. But even before that, her video.


SSPX Extremes | FORWARD BOLDLY
Christine Niles | 30 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQuhPuxWqZA


You considered it a kind of dissimulation to not include the position on the Mass into the Creed.

But a position is not a dogma or even an inherited ecclesial doctrine.

It is dogma or doctrine that Babel happened as described in Genesis 11. It is my position that this temporally happened in 401 after the Flood, not 101 or 529/531 as other text versions would indicate, and that that is 2557 BC. It is my position that this corresponds in carbon dating to c. 8000 BC. It is my position that this geographically was Göbekli Tepe. It is my position that Nimrod intended a space rocket, not some kind of skyscraper. It is my position that bricks for stones and slime for mortar describe slightly different materials, but the words were reused for what we refer to as bricks and bitumen.

Each of these positions could be false, even if I don't think any of them actually is false. But the falsification of any of these would not in the least involve falsifying the doctrinal position that Genesis 11 is history. Nimrod in some way tried to reach heaven and didn't have the means to do so, he forced all the human population to cooperate with his project and God liberated them from that by miraculously exchanging the linguistic content in the formed language capacities of adults. Each knew one language, like I know more or less 8, dialects of Germanic and Latin. Each went to bed knowing the same language and they rose next morning knowing different ones (as if tomorrow I didn't understand a bit of Germanic or Latin, but knew Chinese, Japanese, Cantonese instead, examples of languages I don't know). This would be true even if each of my positions were wrong.

I put my positions into essays, I'd not include them in a creed, even if I had the authority or task imposed by an authority to formulate one.

5:30 What exact year is this page from?

Bc I had heard "we will never recommend anyone to go to the new mass" ... and "often at risk of invalidity" before I attended reverend Novus Ordo by a priest ordained before the changes in a time and place where a TLM specifically from them was inaccessible.

6:49 Indeed.

The only logical options are:

  • Novus Ordo is valid and licit
  • not valid or at least not licit since St. Paul VI, prisoner in the Vatican; acted under duress (position of Palmarians)
  • not valid or at least not licit since Montini was not validly Pope and neither was V-II a Council. (position of Sedevacantists and Conclavists)


7:45 Your beef, as OK with Vatican II, and our beef, as Conclavists, and their beef as Sedevacantists, with SSPX is the same.

Pope Michael I called it "pope-sifting"

11:01 In other words, they are in the canonical position of Abbot Schachleiter if he wanted to celebrate Mass in a Church in Munich outside his monastery (I'm not sure whether his faculties in the monastery depended on the bishop or the abbatial arrangement).

The withdrawal of faculties was bc of his personal friendship to Hitler. Taken to allowing him to assist Mass (he was, like other highranking NSDAP, excommunicated by German bishops). However, he didn't take it to allowing Hitler to get absolved or receive Holy Communion.

As a Conclavist, I pretty much agree with [Salza's] assessment on SSPX, though I have been cirkling around that position about half of my life. I take his position as less reasonable about Conclavism or Cum ex Apostolatus ...

19:07 Truth ... it was back at Novus Ordo (reverent, by a priest ordained before the change of rite) that I heard of CCC §283.

In 1991, when I was more like Ecclesia Dei, CCC was not there.

In 1992, when I got to SSPX, I had so much other stuff, I vaguely heard about it.

Only in Malmö, 2001, did I hear about CCC § 283. Not by the old priest. But it was still in a Catechism, or what purported to be such. Prior to this, in all of my conversion (Christmas 1984 to Pentecost or Easter Tide 1988), in my turning to Ecclesia Dei and to SSPX, no priest had ever asked me to treat Young Earth Creationism as an error. Or Geocentrism, though it wasn't sth I held yet.

Here the logical alternatives are:

  • the Church and even Jesus got it wrong for near 2000 years, until John Paul II corrected things in 1992
  • Wojtyla was not the Pope.


If you think "tertium datur" please spell it out. As far as I know, Salza is not keen on CCC § 283 either, but he can afford what I can't afford, or couldn't afford over decades, being accepted in a NO parish while decrying Old Earth as an actual religious error ... and by now Heliocentrism as one.

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

News from England


Is the King a 'Traitor?'
Dr Gavin Ashenden | 30 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovHW5mb6qUI


Obviously, in one sense an earthly king, just as an earthly high priest, can be a traitor.

Namely to God.

4:22 Given how little Queen Victoria did against Cambridge Liberal Theology (possibly the gateway for Marcan priority, a Kulturkampf horror), I wonder if she didn't commit a worse treason.

Her grandson (my King's grandfather) Charles Edward, the last prince of Sachsen-Coburg Gotha, has much more to do with Aktion T-4 than either of:

  • Austro-Bavarian folklore
  • Guido von List
  • even the Darwinist Rudolf Jung, founder of German National Socialism in Bohemia in 1905 (he wanted separation from Habsburgs and Anschluss to Hohenzollerns or to a Republican Great Germany)
  • the constitutional technicalities, according to some quirks, according to some breach of constitution in the Machtübernahme.


Because he was imbued with the Darwinism or even Galtonism, that Chesterton fought against. Because he was close to doctors. And because they were imbued with it as well.

11:03 In other words. 1688 and 89, the Parliament did too much. (The Irish are likely to recall that).

This time it is likely to not do enough ...

Plus, you have already described it as one of the aggressors (Left Wing Government corresponding to the Majority in House of Commons).

11:18 Parliaments regularly do or accept things the people have not been consulted about.

In 1842, the Swedish people wasn't consulted in any referendum about introducing the school obligation (those without schooling at home or on the expense of the home, had to attend a parochial school, like one which Haga in Westrogothia, presumably now Greater Gothenburg, built only by 1850).

King and Parliament cosigned the deal without consulting the people.

14:11 (offend Christians ...) It might of course offend God as well.

Or it is possible something else will.

I mean, as a Geocentric who considers the visible universe moved each day by one proving even to Pagans his everlasting or inexhaustible power by never failing to do so any day ... I take that somewhat seriously. Some Heliocentric Kantians may take it less seriously ... not by my advise, not that they care about it ...

Let me be precise, I mean the Triune God.

You know, the Son said sth about the Father keeping the Universe going even after Friday Nightfall in Jerusalem TZ (John 5:17 takes place some hours, less than 24, later).

Monday, June 29, 2026

Apocalypticae Considerationes


On my current main blog (third so far), there actually is a label with that name. It's apocalypticae considerationes where only the first four posts were before Covid, 71 after the pandemic was announced.


How to Actually Read the Book of Revelation | The Jimmy Akin Podcast
Jimmy Akin | Sts. Peter and Paul, 29 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N1Ekl3AtII


5:50 Apoc. 11 "spiritually Sodom and Egypt" ... would we be right to look outside Apocalypse to Genesis 19 and to Exodus to find out the social mores of end times earthly Jerusalem?

Does it seem to match anything in current news?

6:06 If St. Hilary of Poitiers had had newspapers, his exegesis would have been newspaper exegesis.

His newspapers would also have been conspiracy leaning.

He considered that the Antichrist was in the wings somewhere in the Byzantine court.

6:13 What the audience would have had in mind is not always automatically true of either early-times records or end times prophecy.

The audience of Moses' Genesis 6 and 11 could not have known of Mahabharata or Göbekli Tepe, yet that seems to perfectly fit "men of renown" before the Flood and the geography of Genesis 11:2.

The audience of John could not have known of ASCII. But it allows a gematria to be made in the most common, i e Latin alphabet, without skipping letters.

St. Irenaeus, I think it was, or possibly St. Hippolytus, said he ruled out Latin bc the letters mostly don't have numeric value and Hebrew because it's too abstruse. Today Greek is if possibly even more abstruse than Hebrew, and ASCII allows Latin letters, the now most used ones, to give full numeric translations of each syllable and letter.

Ruling out this bc the first audience is forgetting God isn't limited to the first audience, if it's not about sth they have to apply directly. Like the first audience of Matthew 6:7 were supposed to apply that immediately and would have known things like the finishing prayer in Velleius Paterculus, but be totally ignorant of "Allah's 99 names" and except for St. Thomas a few decades later of Hindu mantras ... unless even that is an innovation in a later reorganised Hinduism. But Genesis 6 and Apoc 13 left nothing to immediately apply.

8:27 Can you give even one Roman Catholic ruling from prior to Vatican II that says prophecy or early-times records (aka prehistory and to those ancients even more ancient history) needs to be interpreted as the first audience must have done?

Like Pontifical Biblical Academy, Holy Office, and so on.

A grade above Scheben or Ott, who had imprimatur, but each was only used in some seminaries ...

12:51 Daniel.

And the fourheaded leopard is Greece. Whatever was fourheaded about Greece in Hellenistic times, I can make a case for four heads in the end times.

Greece at this time worshipped Hercules very much and practised Stoicism.

So, we would expect ultra-masculine societies with sodomy issues, and has a huge fad for Immanuel Kant.

Judaism. Islam. Calvinism. Freemasonry.

Also, Greece compared to Rome had a more totalitarian and societally fixed education standard (Antonine Rome had full liberty in school choice, legally). All of the four have too precise criteria of maturity and tend to favour very centralised schooling.

You notice I didn't say "Protestantism" but "Calvinism" ... Lutherans and Anglicans in home base are very liberal theologically, basically a kind of neo-pagans. They score lioness of Babylon / lion as mouth.

It can be noticed, England and Scotland no longer have Elisabeth and Denmark no longer has Margarethe, though she is still alive. In the case of Elisabeth, one can argue that eagles wings being taken off her back was loosing the Empire of India (or in a longer sense, UK losing the US after 1776), being forced to stand was being forced to take a coronation oath, because someone else was supposed to be king, and being given the heart of a man could either be taken in a very modern sense, Prince Philip "didn't worship her, only the ground she walked on" ... or in an ancient sense, parallel to Nebuchadnezzar getting sane, if she saw Protestantism doesn't make sense. Or in a somewhat intermediate sense, the World War II version of St. Joan or of Jeanne Hachette. However, the Greek says: καὶ καρδία ἀνθρώπου ἐδόθη αὐτῇ. I presume she took some mental distance from Protestantism, if not from being a kind of Popess for it.

13:38 The ten horns certainly point to Republican and early Caesarian Rome.

Decemviri. Legibus faciundis. Stlitibus whatever the gerund was ... from at least the Gracchi, newly acquired soil for Rome was distributed by this kind of office. And the Twelve Tables were still in force, nominally. Essentially ten kings at a time.

At a certain point the Soviet Union had 12 concurrent Peoples' commissariats, one of them led by Yagoda, NKVD. Народный комиссариат внутренних дел. Would be instructive to see how many KKVD chiefs who were executed or assassinated, like if there were three of them, like Genrikh Yagoda was one.

16:53 The Middle Advent also involves Jesus as now coming in the flesh.

The Eucharist.




Update:

The 1,900 Year Old Number of the Beast Has Finally Been Decoded
Totus Catholica | 1 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgE0GB_dehQ


If early Christians considered the Beast as Nero Caesar in Hebrew, why are already Hippolytus and Irenaeus saying the Beast is an end times figure, as yet seen from their time only upcoming, and why does one of them specify that the gematria has to be in Greek, by default since Hebrew is to unknown (like Greek is today) and since Latin (up to ASCII)?

And why were they sure the katekhon of 2 Thessalonians hadn't yet been taken out of the way?

Sunday, June 28, 2026

Kirill's and Vladimir's Russia Targets Protestants?


Russia’s War on Protestant Churches
Apologetics Roadshow | 26 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGs5xt55VZg


6:59 I also view Baptists as heretical to very inadequately catechised Christians.

I'm not into bombing your churches, if you will call them that.

Russia has a kind of paranoia about the Bible and taking it literally.

Oh, surely the Orthodox take the Bible literally? Yeah, Vladimir Moss probably does. Vladimir Putin doesn't, nor do the ecclesiastics he is surrounded with, like Kirill.

Hence, a paranoia about taking the Bible literally.

7:40 I just read along the text a bit quicker than you read aloud.

The Church utilises the concept of "symphonia" ...

OK. Symphonia or in Roman Catholic terms "Christendom" or "Constantinism" or its avatars "Clovisism" and "Volodimirism" for Francia and Ukraine is rooted in Matthew 28 verse ... tada, drum roll, yes, I was right ... 19.

Symphonia makes very good sense for a situation like under the last Czar and was even then abused against Ukrainean Uniates. But under the last Czar, the minimum age for marriage was 15 / 13 (after previously having been 14 / 12, like in Roman Catholicism), and abortion was banned.

In current Russia, abortion is legal, but marrying before 18 / 18 in most regions still isn't.

Under the Czar, sodomy was legally punishable, but that was not enforced. Under Putin, homosexuality is even on that level legal, but tolerance is not fully enforced. Legalise a thing to get a category of people bullied for doing it ... (or for having an unmerited reputation, which cannot be tested since the charge isn't a criminal one).

So, the current Russian state is very much less Christian than that of the Czars.

Kirill's "symphonia" makes zero sense, and it could be a good thing to show symphonia for a Christian state (if there were one) actually opposed to Kirill's and Putin's Russia.

By "Francia" I mean what Germans call "Frankenreich" ... Germany, Switzerland, Austria, BeNeLux, Liechtenstein, Monaco and Northern Italy added to France / Frankreich.

13:24 That's interesting.

Perhaps a decade ago, I had Jay Dyer among my FB friends ...

No longer the case on either of my profiles.

He's also a kind of guy who doesn't allow a wikipedia page, despite being a public figure ...

15:33 ROCOR isn't unified now.

Some have made and some haven't made peace with Patriarchate of Moscow.

Vladimir Moss is also ROCOR, but clearly not a Putin fan. Nor a Kirill fan.

Appendix, Jay Dyer:

THIS ONE ARGUMENT ENDS PROTESTANTISM!
Jay Dyer | 8 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nikr-FF2Tk4


There is actually a refutation of Sola Scriptura in the NT.

Luke 24:27.

Now, I saw you mentioned in a video:

Russia’s War on Protestant Churches
Apologetics Roadshow | 26 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGs5xt55VZg


I commented under it, and my comments are also on this post:

Kirill's and Vladimir's Russia Targets Protestants?
Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere | Sunday, June 28, 2026
https://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2026/06/kirills-and-vladimirs-russia-targets.html


If you wish to interact, up to you, I'll be sharing. But seriously, Protestantism isn't about Sola Scriptura, you refute it by Malachi 1:11 and Hebrews 13:10.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

"Four" Criteria of the Messiah


I gave my solution at 1 minute fifteen seconds into the video, before hearing his:


The #1 Jewish Objection to Jesus...Falls Apart
HIGHWAY 53 - by Jeff Morgan | 26 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQOSTbwW9SI


1:15 World peace is a conflation of two different prophecies.

1) Disarmament and reconciliation of Judah and Ephraim, fulfilled in Christian Palestinians since Acts 2 and Acts 8 (yes, they spoke Aramaic back then, they only switched to Arabic after the failure of the Crusades, whil Muslim Palestinians were somewhat faster).
2) The "word of peace" shall go out to the nations.

Doesn't say it will be obeyed. Just that it will be taught.

The three others are singly fulfilled.

A) Jesus tore down and built up the Third Temple (which He had created for Himself in His Mother's Womb)
B) The exiles fathered on Pentecost (and the direction of all four corners of the "earth" or mainland are represented)
C) Catholicism is knowledge of God, and it is, as the name implies (kath holon ten gen) universal.

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Some People Mistrust the Rosary and All and Any Meditative Prayer


This Form of Prayer Looks Christian…But Isn’t
Molly Ann Luna | 23 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUEOWQjFOAY


5:14 No, you do not find them in ancient pagan rituals.

We know way too little about Eleusis to say anything for certain except that it was way more physical than just meditation on some kind of mantra.

If you want phrases from the Bible that the actual Church God founded has vetted and approved as truth for this kind of usage, combine Luke 1:28 (minus the intro) with Luke 1:42 (also minus the intro), and if you want something longer and less emptying, add, after "thy womb" the words "Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and in the hour of our death"

If you want a break, take after each ten of these a praise on the Holy Trinity and then before each ten of these Matthew 6:9 to 13 (minus the intro).

It's called the Rosary.

As for known ancient pagan rituals, they weren't mantras. For the same year as Jesus spoke Matthew 6:7, where the Greek hasn't the word "thrallein" which means repeat the way you describe, you have a recorded ancient Pagan prayer which is the last § of Velleius Paterculus Roman History book II. It's NOTHING like a centering prayer.

Now, if you want Biblical support for repetitive prayers, take the fact that Jesus prayed nights through. Sleep privation can be compensated by the hypnotic state. Meaning, this is presumably how He prayed, since it would have been very difficult to pray an entire night without such support, physiologically speaking.

You mentioned "talking like a child to his father" but do your children never sit silent next to you or your hubby and just feel your presence?

PS, the peace and quiet are not responses from the spirit world, but from your brain. It is not a result of opening up, but opens you up to what you want to open up to ... preferrably God. You don't need a demon to get quiet after repetitive prayer. It's called the alpha state. It's not a result you force, it's a condition for starting to pray with confidence, or at least a help to doing so.

Friendly Neighborhood Jesus Freak
@fnjesusfreak
That's NECROMANCY, Patrick!

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@hglundahl
@fnjesusfreak 1) My name isn't Patrick. If you assumed I was Irish, thank you for the compliment.
2) Adressing saints who have passed on isn't necromancy. The description is very specific, and the Rosary doesn't fit it. See the Witch of Endor.
3) Our Lady, on top of that, has, like Her Son, resurrected and entered Heaven body and soul.

You are echoing Jews who call Christians necromancers for adressing Jesus.

Friendly Neighborhood Jesus Freak
Chapter and verse, or it didn't happen.

Couldn't go below notified comment
so I answer it here instead.

He that heareth you, heareth me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth me; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me.
[Luke 10:16]


But Catholic clergy who are their successors say 3 happened, so it did. Mary is alive, body and soul, in Heaven.

On top of that, you gave no chapter and verse for your claim about prayers to saints being necromancy.