Apocalypticae Considerationes · More on Apoc. 13:18
They're Saying He's the Antichrist…
Totus Catholica | 2 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAeV6iLv5NY
0:34 "whose identity God has not given us permission to assign"
Whence, if so, the words He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six.
Now, identifying someone's name as involving that gematria is not final proof, but it is a warning signal.
- Safe House
- @virtualzhbl
- @hglundahl -- The official title of the Pope in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei in English translate to Vicar of the Son of God. In Roman numerals, the Latin phrase Vicarius Filii Dei adds up to 666.
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @hglundahl
- @virtualzhbl The official titleS you conflate are "Vicarius Christi" which doesn't so add up, and "Servus Servorum Dei" which doesn't so add up.
Plus Roman numerals is NOT the correct gematria for Apoc. 13:18.
Now a Church Father said, and that was before Constantine in case you are into the Hislop slop, it can't be Latin letters, because they don't have a numeric value for each letter (that has changed in ASCII) and it can't be Hebrew, it's too unknown, so it must be Greek (which is now as unknown as Hebrew was then).
If you want an institution, take doctors, since they swear by Apollon, who in that capacity could have been a man, and the five cases of Apollon in Greek add up to 2666. (I said Greek, not modern Greek, OK).
0:34 future He certainly was future back in the time of St. John.
5:05 If all you want is not to be deceived by a counterfeit, and I mean all, then all you need to do is look at anything purported to be a saviour, compare to Jesus, say "no, it isn't" ....
However, if also you want to not be unfair to a — dare I say fellow? — Christian, you might want two more things.
1) Verify he really claimed to be a saviour, and not just a Christian whistleblower (like Chesterton) or man of providence (like Franco).
2) Verify his name adds up to 666.
Now, there are a specific set of circumstances that do line up the "future" reign of the Antichrist. I put "future" in quotation marks, because it certainly was future back in St. John's or St. Irenaeus' day, it need not be future by much when I write it or at all when someone reads it.
1) Ban from participation in the market for not taking the mark;
2) Decapitation for refusal to take the mark.
It's probable these are successive. The thing is, vaccinations and masks are images of the medical corps, which does at least nominally worship one Apollo in the Hippocratic oath. Now, the Classic Attic five cases of Apollo do add up to 2666. Also, vaccines against Covid were made by viruses or virus extracted bacterially cultivated proteins, where the cultivation or initial cultivation of viruses for each strand and each new version of the vaccine takes place in human fetal cells from an abortion. This is both the case for Moderna and for Sputnik V.
So, we may already have witnessed stage 1, ban from participation in the market for not taking the mark. I have been refused in one bakery to buy even a coffee for not wearing a mask while entering.
5:05 bis a code you can break to unmask a world leader.
There takes more than this gematria for a world leader to be Antichrist, the final one, but not less. If you had no other suspicions, that gematria might tip you off. But arguably, if you even looked it up, apart from being very curious, you might have had other reasons about the man.
St. Hippolytus certainly says that not everyone who has that in his name is the Antichrist, since that gematria is fairly common. The man who delivered St. John from Patmos, M. NEPOYAC, in Genitive had M. NEPOYA, which adds up to 666. However, in ASCII, the gematria is not all that common. With nine upper case letters of the English alphabet, the chances are (all combinations adding up to 666 per all of nine upper case) c. 1/140 or 1/150.
Putin has three versions of this gematria. Charles III and any male successor of his has two versions.
WLADIMIRA (Genitive / Accusative of Wladimir). VLADIMIRB (Vladimir B, Vladimir II). These two are potentially common with Zelensky, which could explain why he made Russian non-official across Ukraine. Volodimir does not so add up. And V POUTINE (V. POUTINE, but pointless, since full stop is called a point in French), like if he did sth pointless in a French speaking country.
ENGELSMAN. skotte.
(Elisabeth was ENGELSKA / skotska, does not so add up).
Both are, and so is Zelensky, endorsing Covid vaccination.
5:20 Sometimes technology in your hand spells out allegiance.
You held a cell phone in your right hand in 2021, you showed the vaccination app, you showed you thought you owed more to a medical scare endorsed by the government than to the unborn.
CELLPHONE also spells out 666 in ASCII.
5:26 Looking up Irenaeus.
Moreover, another danger, by no means trifling, shall overtake those who falsely presume that they know the name of Antichrist. For if these men assume one [number], when this [Antichrist] shall come having another, they will be easily led away by him, as supposing him not to be the expected one, who must be guarded against.
I would say:
Moreover, another danger, by no means trifling, shall overtake those who falsely presume that they know the name of Antichrist. For if these men assume one [name], when this [Antichrist] shall come having another, they will be easily led away by him, as supposing him not to be the expected one, who must be guarded against.
In other words, he is not warning against calculating the numbers of already known men, but trying to know the name well before the arrival.
Supposing anyone had in 1850 calculated in advance (very fictitious example, since not so adding up) that the Antichrist would bear the name Adolf. There could have been two outcomes related to a certain baby in 1889. a) He could have been deliberately so named in an attempt to secure him the position of Antichrist, or b) he could have been beaten in 1945 and people thought the peril was over, when a much better candidate was a certain WLADIMIR A (Wladimir A, Wladimir I, Lenin), who was still worshipped in his maosolaeum and whose successor Stalin was clearly not out of the way.
St. Irenaeus is not warning against looking out for a certain person. He's warning against knowing the name before the person appears. You can't do that in the same culture. Hebrews could literally in advance know from Isaias that a certain deliverer would be called Cyrus. But that was because the people around Cambyses were totally unaware of Hebrew prophecy. Since the Antichrist comes after world wide Christendom, after preaching of the Gospel (including the Apocalypse) to all nations, a direct prophecy of the name would be a shortcircuit.
Isaias didn't prophecy Jesus would be called Jesus, he prophecied Immanuel, which is the same meaning as Jesus. And John didn't tell us the actual name, but the number of the name. Having that number is not an immediate indictment, as can be seen from M. NEPOYA. But not having it is an acquitment.
St. Irenaeus is actually telling us what to wait for:
But, knowing the sure number declared by Scripture, that is, six hundred sixty and six, let them await, in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom, [let them learn] to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, having a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation.
The division of the kingdom into ten ... if it's a round number it has happened in more than one break-up of Roman and deutero-Roman statehood.
Austro-Hungary had 8 successor states. Or nine if you count the same territory twice, first as SHS and then as Yugoslavia.
Russian Empire. Russia, Ukraine, Finland, Poland, Romania (as it took Bessarabia), Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Mongolia, perhaps?
West Rome had some successor kingdoms in the Age of Migrations, Carolingian Empire started out parting into three parts, but the middle split further ...
5:31 Ah, you stopped citing Irenaeus before he told us what to wait for ...
No, he didn't refuse to play the game.
He said it was premature to play it, the stage was not yet set.
If you go to Lateran V, the language echoes that sentiment.
Now, Irenaeus may have misunderstood "ten kings" as "ten independent states" rather than a single state ruled by committees of ten. As Ancient Roman Republic was more than once.
There is another Biblical thing to wait for. "until the one withholding is taken out of the way" ... if the katekhon is Jesus Christ and His Church, that cannot happen. But if it's for instance a Christian Roman Emperor, well Nicholas II of Russia was murdered and Charles I had to leave the Hofburg. According to one founding father, Karl Renner, of the first Austrian Republic, he and all heirs not formally and finally abdicating, could have no Austrian statehood or residence. Otto von Habsburg had an Austrian passport "valid in all countries except Austria" ... I would say Charles I did not just step out of the way, but was in a real sense taken out of the way.
The Medieval monk Adso (not "of Melk," that being a fictional character in Umberto Eco, but I can't recall the actual place he was abbot of) didn't include East Rome, but just the two divisions of West Rome / Carolingian. Germany and France.
1789 (or 1791 or 1830) and, as mentioned, 1918.
6:26 As you mentioned Holy Mass, bishops closed down Masses during the Covid emergency.
8:22 Actually, the First Covenant or Old Covenant (which had precedents prior to Moses and in that sense wasn't the first) lives on in the New Covenenant.
Judaism, as in non-Catholics, apart from its capacity to be apostasy, is more like cosplay than direct participation in the Old Covenant as it stood until Caiaphas made it impure.
8:52 "the true worship over the counterfeit, the Eucharist over the endless scroll of fear"
Apocalyptic fearmongering doesn't pretend to be in and of itself an act of worship.
And what I found at least a very close shadow of the mark of the beast in is itself, not via internet primarily, or via its private actors, but via state sponsored information, a "scroll" of fear. Fear of being the next one to transmit a virus that may be deadly to someone unless you tick off every point in a checklist, but primarily two items:
- mask worn as a metopon (one meaning being face shield)
- a cell phone in the right hand used to show vaccination status or for payment without contact ... which is still very promoted. And becomes more and more of an excuse against alms.
I mentioned Austro-Hungary as broken up into 8 territories, but before that the Holy Roman Empire, what Adso meant by Germany, had already lost Switzerland in the Peace of Westphalia and Germany in 1870. And 1870 is also the time when France last ceased to have a crowned monarch, Napoleon III. Now, 8 + 1 + 1 = 10.
One more suspect:
84 + 82 + 65 + 79 + 82 + 201 = 593 (TRAORÉ)
73 + 593 = 666 (add an I)
Except, if he was never baptised, he's not an apostate and is therefore not fulfilling that pretty probable if not certain criterium.
