Saturday, November 7, 2026

Just Heard About Karl Bushby


I'm kind of developing my response along the way as I hear the video by Brett Cooper.

I know some have considered me in terms equivalent to those she uses to describe the behaviour of Karl. If in 2004 I had stayed in Sweden or returned to Sweden, I would not have had a good chance of getting married, and my mother could have been used to humiliate me in ways painful to her, I actually bought her freedoms by getting and staying away. She bought me freedom by not directly telling me to get back, even if presumably she'd have been happy at least the first month just for being able to see me.


He Left His Son Behind for a 28-Year Journey Across the World
Brett Cooper | 6 Nov 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR_1MmmjnCQ


7:08 Given the divorce had already taken place and his ex-wife had custody, I think Karl Bushby may have missed less of his son's life than other dad's in similar positions do, while being less remarkable and trying to keep visitation rights.

Each time Karl had a girl friend, this was a mortal sin of adultery.

If Adam got a stepfather, the mother would have entered a mortal sin of adultery.

If during visits Karl would have approved of that relation, he would have made himself complicit to mortal sin of adultery.

Mortal sins aren't worth it even to keep seeing your own flesh and blood.

I find it possible, if his ex-wife didn't remarry and for the time they both spent on the internet together, that he provided for his son and his wife better than many other divorced dads would have been able to do. BECAUSE he did something remarkable.

8:30 Quoting the man himself: "It has been a purely selfish way to be"

So?

To Kantians, selfishness is the root of evil. To Christians, it isn't.

8:44 It seems one should be worried about Bushby's soul.

Shackleton and Cook, looked them up, were not horrible other than by definition, i e by being away some time.

On that view Hindus would have to diss Yudhishthira and Rama, who were absent from wives Draupadi and Sita (when it comes to Arjuna, he seems to have been a horrible husband to Draupadi) (Or, that could be the opinion of the girl who wrote the prose version of Mahabharata I read and based on this, but I did come away from the reading with a sense that he was a horrible husband — though it was Yudhishthira who played dice! — as well as a great warrior) (That 12 year old girl was a diplomat's daughter, daughter to an Indian Ambassador, she summarised Mahabharata as an assignment, and did it so long that it reads like a novel ...)

No, there is no reason to take explorers as being ipso facto bad fathers.

In this case, I think he may have made life better for Adam than by staying home.

But self denigration and playing to the public are a dangerous way to go, unless he's genuinely hurting from a remark his son made.

The logical sequence of this "idealism" (if anything more than personal) is stating that people with any kind of special mission should have no wives or children. Did Bushby watch too much Game of Thrones?

The logic is epitomised by "Night's Watch" and their oath (as a conlanger, I have seen more than one translate it into their respective conlangs, I have refused to follow the trend).

9:36 James Cook changed the world for the worse by making Australia English ... only recently have Aborigines started to regain some dignity.

It would have been better for them to have come under Spain.

Now, proving the Bering Land Bridge and the extent of the walk certainly is part of the greater good of knowledge.

12:13 Like the men on the Kon Tiki expedition, I've been in love with the grand daughter of the Swede on board, but she didn't like me (that way at least) ..., he was proving a prehistoric traval physically possible.

12:23 Yes, he wanted to. And the guys had not taken the steps to show the prehistoric passage possible, as far as he knew, so he did. Even if they had been there before.

Doing a thing you want is not the definition of crime or of vice.

12:30 "He didn't have to"

Most good things we do are things we didn't have to.

At the age of 26, Cook was offered a promotion to captain of Friendship, but he declined and instead joined the Royal Navy at Wapping on 17 June 1755. He entered the navy when Britain was expanding its naval forces in anticipation of the conflict that became known as the Seven Years' War. ... The Treaty of Paris – signed when the Seven Years' War ended in 1763 – enabled the Royal Navy to redirect resources from warfare to exploration. Britain soon dispatched several explorers to the Pacific Ocean, including John Byron, Samuel Wallis, and Philip Carteret.


John Byron was the father of many children, Samuel Wallis as far as I can see unmarried, Philip Carteret married after his discoveries.

Bushby was pushed to make a blanket statement covering all of these guys and so far it fits none of them.

OK, if he meant Edward Shackleton ...

In 1938 Shackleton married Betty Homan, and they had two children, Alexandra (born 1940) and Charles (1942–1979).


Just two children? Sounds like they were tampering with fertility, that couple. On top of that, he was a Labour Politician ....

13:21 Have you forgotten that Karl was divorced both from responsibilities to his wife and to his son?

By the way, not all travelling is comparable. I quite Sweden in order to settle in France, not in order to simply have a high life as a vagabond here.

I've been in Paris since 2009, with surrounding region. I have time after time stated my occupation, writer, and goal, to get a publisher, and time after time been met with "so you are travelling around, how romantic!" and "let us help you some way on your road!"

I have lived a settled life as much as I possibly could, except I could have settled (ha ha) for a probably demeaning life of people "taking care of me" because obviously, if I had been so long without a home, I couldn't be all right, could I?

Now, Karl didn't have a settled life to break up from. It was already gone, since three years.

He joined the British Army at the age of 16 and served with the 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment for 11 years, serving in Northern Ireland during Operation Banner, where he met his wife Angela in Belfast. They married and had a child, Adam, before divorcing in 1995.


I looked up Operation Banner:

In May 1992, there were clashes between paratroopers and Catholic civilians in the town of Coalisland, triggered by a bomb attack on a British Army patrol in nearby Cappagh that severed the legs of a paratrooper. The soldiers ransacked two pubs, damaged civilian cars and opened fire on a crowd.[72] Three civilians were hospitalized with gunshot wounds. As a result, the Parachute Regiment was redeployed outside urban areas and the brigadier at 3 Infantry Brigade, Tom Longland, was relieved of his command.[73][74]


Well, there seems to have been spiritual causes to his divorce, since he was technically a persecutor of the Catholic Church.

14:01 OK, seven years Catalina + three years Rika = ten years in adultery.

Tried to look up his wife Angela, but only found his mother, also named Angela.

14:55 OK ... back and forth to Colombia ... normal travel ...

Seing his son same way? No.

The best excuse I can find, it's not a justification, is, seing his son was the long term goal, as well as seing his mother. Seing Catalina was a dissipation, so it didn't count ...

15:38 Those situations in the son's life could have coincided with times when dad was legitimately walking or legitimately held back by red tape.

And the option of always being with the son until he left home was gone in 1995. Well before this journey.

Now, some people think army discipline is what you need to be a responsible parent. Karl Bushby had lots of that in Operation Banner.

Given some on the Protestant side in the Six Counties are Masonic (Orangist Lodges), I'm not sure he wasn't pushed into this kind of parental betrayal by Freemasons.

17:54 The celebrations are definitely part of Adam's reward, not just Karl's.

Read the Odyssey.

Adam, like Telemachus, had been mocked about his father. The celebrations were clearly needed for the son as well.

I am not bitter against my father for being absent (except one time I saw him at age 4). I am not bitter against him for not supporting me with 50 SEK, when that ferry-ticket could have spared me a second trial (between Germany and Sweden at the time, fugitives were sent back, but people who had been acquitted once weren't for a second trial).

I would be much more bitter if he had after that meddled in diverse ways to keep me back from what I have been trying to do, including effectively leave Sweden. Not just physically, and Swedes still pulling strings to the right and the left. It can be bad to be forced to be a grown up when you are a child or even to be forced to "grow up" when being naive. It's worse to be forced to be a child, when you are grown up.

Insofar as Karl didn't hamper Adam from marrying and staying faithful to his wife, or force him to anything like Operation Banner, I think Karl is a better father, than what in some dark moments I suspect my dad to have been. Especially if he's a Freemason and hopes to make me one.

18:55 He's confusing individuals from all over the world, with "the world" ...

God bless them who helped him, of course!

That doesn't mean God bless each of these countries in their total ramifications.

Calling the world "a big team" may have some truth to it, on that individual level, but it also has some unpleasant globalist connotations.

20:17 In German, RZ is not pronounced like in Polish, basically ZH, but it's R + the German value of Z, which is TS. Like in Italian if you have ever ordered a PIZZA.

20:38 Grandfather, I hear you.

Being a father for Adam .... I think he did alright already, given he's married and a father since 12 years at least.

Hope he's had other children since, family planning is a horrible vice ...

20:50 I think there is some reason to celebrate his achievement though.

  • 1) As he shares traits with Ulysses, he reminds that Ulysses is a prophecy about the end times. Pagan prophecy, but still. Antinous = Antichrist. Penelope weaving = Harlot. Penelope taking the wooft apart again = Faithful Church. Routing of the Suitors = Armageddon. (Ramayana also has some vibes on these themes).
  • 2) But he's also done Young Earth Creationism a favour:

    He left Hull on 5 October 1998 and originally expected to finish the trek of 36,000-mile (58,000 km) in 12 years.


    So, let's suppose the Behrings theory is correct and the Spanish priest and scholar who thought ancestors of the Peruvians crossed Atlantis before it sank was wrong ... 12 years after the Flood, or so, Armenia was no further from Behring's part time (in the post-Flood Ice Age) Landbridge than England is, so he helped to answer a question that is sometimes thrown out against adherents of the actually global Flood.


21:56 The lifetime with his family was already gone.

It was not his for the staying back. I don't know who brought up divorce in 1995, but the divorce happened that year, and in 1998, divide that by three by the way, we can't know that Karl could have repaired the marriage. If he can so, now, great.

In a Sense, they ARE Ushering in the End Times (From the Wrong Side)


Pete Hegseth faces impeachment. He's far more extreme than you think.
STELLA MARIS MEDIA | 7 Nov. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4MfQjSBnbM


Are you aware that his pastor friend "Blog and Mablog" is advocating long term for a Protestant establishment banning for instance Marian Processions as "idolatry"?

Obviously, to his friend John Knox, sorry, rolemodel, the Holy Mass is also idolatrous, hence the Penal laws.

1:36 By 1917, is he referring to Balfour?

3:24 The Biblical terms should give him a tip.

Judaea and Samaria were 2000 years ago, minus a few, united under one kingship, see Acts 2 and 8.

Christian Palestinians are direct heirs of the First Christians.

Making him an heir of the men who financed Saul's trips to persecute the Church.

4:04 "a thousand years"

For the population as a whole, 2000 years. As united. And before that, it's Judean (including Galilean) and Samarian components separated and sometimes at war for near another 1000 years, since Jeroboam rebelled against Rohoboam.

For specific single families, 1000 years may be correct.

4:11 All Biblical prophecies of Greater Israel were fulfilled 2000 years ago.

I've gone through basically sentence by sentence in Isaias 11, from the verse "and His sepulchre" (or tabernacle) "shall be glorious" and while some seems obscure, the whole seems fulfilled 2000 years ago.

In Palestine.

Calling Jesus a Palestinian isn't like calling Mozart an Austrian (in his time Salzburg was a distinct part of the Kingdom of Germany, other than Austria), it's like calling Clovis and St. Clotilde French.

4:23 I believe Palestine belongs to Israelites.

This includes Christian Palestinians, with the correct covenant, Mitsrahis with remains of a superceded covenant, and Muslim Palestinians who are as outside the covenants (the past and the present covenant) of God as secular Jews are.

4:55 In a certain sense they are right.

They in Israel are volunteering for the role of Antichrist's end times allies, the men whom St. John described as spiritually Sodom (Pride Parade, Yuval Harari, check) and Egypt (Settlers, Ben Gvir, check).

Or he described the city composed of such men as that.

Friday, November 6, 2026

Milo Rossi, Everyone's Absolute Favourite Mini-Minute-Man, Critiques a Creationist Text Book (First Half of the Video)


Trying To Read A Creationist Propaganda Textbook
Miniminuteman | 29 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9cMdAKcBuQ


9:00 No design flaw for Edenic conditions, where there would have been no stress.

No design flaw for post-Edenic conditions, where stressing out may come with punishments.

And a design total bonus, as it allows us to speak ...

9:42 The problem isn't whether thoughtless process or "magic" as you like to put it is easier to understand but whether either of them makes the rest even possible to understand

10:46 You are welcome.

Your taste for beer and the acknowledgement that IPA isn't the best do help. My gramp was a brewer (technically), i e a distiller (factually) (distillers are part of the brewer's union in Sweden)

11:39 The mere existence of modern geology?

OK, if I were to tell you that studying the stars (what was ascending on the horizon, where Sun, Moon and other planets were) when someone was born doesn't give you any kind of authoritative clue to that someone's character, is that debunked by the mere existence of astrology?

13:59 The Flood was not in this sense "one event" ...

A flock of ammonites gets trapped? Yep, there is a layer with ammonites ...

A few microorganisms get squeezed? Yep, there is limestone (three layers, I think)

A mountain or two get sandpapered and the débris needs depositing? Can you spell Coconino!?

The Flood didn't happen in one day ... OK. Therefore not "one event" in this sense.

14:12 Uniformitarianism also says that warves are not necessarily layers ... they are undulations when a layer is deposited from oversaturated emulsion.

The late Guy Berthault showed this experimentally.

Creationists, we typically don't criticise overall uniformitarianism without some kind of support in uniformitarianism on the details level.

1570. Johannes Kepler. Are we surprised at all that a guy in 1570 was a creationist? It's really funny to be like, "See guys, look at all these dudes that were creationists." And then just refer to a time in history where it was the best understanding that we had of the world because we hadn't discovered science yet.


So technically you agree that Kepler by being Heliocentric had not discovered science?

More seriously, you seem bent on making Evolution the hallmark of science.

While my gramp was Agnostic and Evolutionist, the science he got about Saccharomyces (yes, Absolut is distilled from a kind of beer, just like Cognac is distilled from a kind of wine) ... he didn't need to believe Microbes to Man Evolution to get that part.

16:39 No, we can't see organisms changing over time.

They are dead.

Are you trying to make succession of faunas (or floras) an argument for using rock layers to date millions of years, just as rock layers?

A little hint though. I believe that the skeleta or fossils of Tautavel classified as Homo erectus, dated to 550,000 to 400,000 years ago and the skeleta or fossils of Permian critters in Karoo were laid to rest in the same sequence of events, starting in Iyar of Noah's 600's years. If I'm wrong, how about digging below Caune de l'Arago until you hit, presumably a km lower, something from the Permian?

16:41 "you look at that"

Which diagramme, as even Kent Hovind knew, is nowhere found in the terrain.

He's not my absolute fav, I do prefer CMI, but you don't find Stegosaurs in Grand Canyon, for instance.

17:39 You will never find a rock with trilobites beginning to look like lampreys.

You are also unusually safe when speaking of trilobites, since these are marine creatures.

Give me a rock where they find a Uinthatherium and 200 meters further down a Stegosaur ... I'm not going to say "I'm waiting" ... I'd rather show a skeleton on a bench with the sign "still waiting for Milo Rossi to explain where land vertebrate fauna has been found in two superposed layers.

Nowhere on the [ __ ] planet has all of this because how the [ __ ] would you get all of this in one place?


You said it.

It's not there.

You can obviously explain the incompleteness of your proof, but it still leaves the proof incomplete ...

So, when you find a really good fossil record from a certain area, it's normally only for a certain time span.


And, curiously, that timespan is usually not two time spans with millions of years between, unless both levels are marine ...

La Brea Tar Pits, 10 000 to 40 000 years ago = 401 years from Flood to Birth of Peleg ...

The parts dated older than 39 000 years ago are reservoir effect.

Thursday, November 5, 2026

I Do Not Want an Islamic State


The World Isn’t Ready To Watch This.
Beyond Belief with Nuriyah Khan | 29 Oct. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9oqoqeJM_h8

Protestantism Doesn't Fit Matthew 28:16—20


Does Orthodox Devotion to Mary Go Too Far? (Yes)
Testify | 4 Nov 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hsy-l_tTCk


Hans-Georg Lundahl
@hglundahl
Here is my objection which you didn't answer.

Catholicism overdoes Mariology.
Orthodoxy overdoes Mariology.

What about Copts, Armenians, Assyrians (Monophysites and Nestorians, except Monophysites are two different groups, Armenians aren't in communion with Jacobites)?

So, if you find that these too overdo Mariology ... where was the Church that stayed correct?

Matthew 28:16 to 20 says there had to be one. EVERY day and therefore obviously EVERY Century.

If there isn't one, you have two options. Christ failed to keep His promise or maybe one of above actually didn't overdo Mariology.

I'm a Christian, so I'm Catholic.

I

Jin
@jin8982
Don't put a blanket over literally everyone. Not everyone wants to build statues of Mary and call her ""Queen of heaven"" even when heaven heaven doesn't have a Queen.

And no, Christ didn't fail. He kept his word but the Church didn't. As usual. And the Church in NT mentions the Church being the believers all across the world and not one particular institution or a special club filled with proud believers.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@jin8982 If the Church is teaching all the nations, it has to be visible.

II

Crossroads
@Crossroads-inri
I think the issue is what catholics mean by church and what protestants mean. From my point of view Catholics tend to mean an institution, whereas Protestants tend to mean the universal body of people, which could include multiple institutions including the Catholic Church.

So from the Protestant viewpoint it doesn’t matter that there are all these churches in the pre-medieval era overdoing Mariology; the true believers who have faith in Christ and are faithful to him are still there.

A

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@Crossroads-inri "the true believers who have faith in Christ and are faithful to him are still there."

Where they so back then?

Can you document it.

Crossroads
@hglundahl I can’t provide a list of every faithful Christian who ever lived, no. But I don’t have to. The burden of proof of the Catholic Church being the “one true church” is on the Catholic Church

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@Crossroads-inri The burden of proof for their being a non-Catholic, equally non-Orthodox, equally non-Coptic, equally non-Armenian-Apostolic, and equally non-Assyrian remnant is on those needing such a thing.

Crossroads
@hglundahl But historical protestants and modern evangelicals aren’t making the claim that their church is the “One True Church.” Why would I be a part of a church that has been around for a long time but teaches unbiblical doctrine? I’d rather hold to the more ancient traditions that are found in Scripture and taught by the apostles, which rejects unbiblical Mariology doctrine and other such errors, as laid out by Testify.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@Crossroads-inri "the more ancient traditions that are found in Scripture"

But are they found AFTER the Bible books were written and BEFORE The Reformation?

If not, considering them Apostolic Traditions is Unbiblical, Antibiblical, against Matthew 28:16 to 20.

B

Thad of all Trades
@thadofalltrades
@Crossroads-inri which is the example in Scripture, God always preserved a remnant even among his chosen people when they fell away.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@thadofalltrades Elijas and the 7000 or King Joas raised by the High Priest are documented in the Bible.

Also, the Old Covenant didn't involve a guarantee against all of the people falling away, as the New Covenant does.

Compare the mentioned verses in Matthew 28 with Deuteronomy 28.

III

Bill Cynic
@billcynic1815
I'm Orthodox, but I know our Protestant friends like to appeal to a righteous remnant existing durimg this time, so I have a similar challenge to them, except an even easier challenge than a body: name one person who lived from the years 325-1054 that wouldn't call you a heretic. Not just "they don't explicitly say what I believe" but "they actively teach the opposite as heresy". Forget the body for a moment, if you can't even identify one person, how can you say the Church stayed correct? Especially for those who like historical evidentialism, where is any evidence of that remnant, the "true believers" they appeal to?

IV

Thad of all Trades
there's always a remnant that remains true to God, when his people go after idols. The Bible shows us over and over again that the natural tendency of humanity is to go after idols, even images which God initially endorsed, like the bronze serpent. So, it makes perfect sense that the church could largely apostatize and only a small remnant remain. This is shown in Revelation 2&3. Of the 7 churches mentioned the majority are in trouble.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@thadofalltrades "So, it makes perfect sense that the church could largely apostatize and only a small remnant remain."

For the end times, this is nearly a promise.

Luke 18:8

As we (or someone after us) are or will be living through that time, we don't need historic documentation to prove the existence of this remnant.

However, for most of the history between the first and second coming, the Church was supposed to teach the nations, the one Who gave the task promising His help and reminding of His omnipotence.

The remnant in the past, like before the Reformation, needs to be documented.

Thad of all Trades
@hglundahl The Papacy is the little horn of Daniel 7, we're already in the end times, we've been there for centuries. Jesus started opening the seals on the scroll when he ascended.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
SHOW the Remnant for centuries concerned, don't just affirm there was one!




Hans-Georg Lundahl
// You actually have to demonstrate that the Pharisees seem to think that their teaching on Corban, for example, was something that was very ancient, maybe even went back to Moses, //


Do they?

Does "tradition of the ancients" mean "tradition from Moses on Mt Sinai"?

InitialPC
@InitialPC
The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.
Matthew 23:2-3

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@InitialPC Sitting in Moses' seat and having everything you say being a tradition from Moses are two different things.

InitialPC
@hglundahl Hear that? That's the sound of the shifting of the goal posts.

Thad of all Trades
@hglundahl they interpreted the law, so everything had to have a basis in the law to be practiced.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@InitialPC The one shifting the goal posts is you.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@thadofalltrades Having a basis in the law and being explicitly part of it by oral tradition since the beginning are two different things.

Friday abstinence has a basis in Apostolic tradition, but is not identic to fasting to 18:30 from all food and after that avoiding meat, dairy and eggs, which is probably how it was done in their day.

Thad of all Trades
@hglundahl there's no evidence that it has been a part of oral tradition from the beginning. That is a baseless claim you guys make and the evidence is actually against there being an oral tradition from the beginning.

InitialPC
@hglundahl "You actually have to demonstrate that the Pharisees seem to think that their teaching on Corban, for example, was something that was very ancient, maybe even went back to Moses"
Now it's "prove they actually do come from Moses"

That is by definition, shifting the goal posts. And pointing out what you are doing, is not the same thing as doing that thing.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@InitialPC I'm not the one asking whether Pharisees come from Moses (via Ezra), they did.

I'm just asking whether they believed, even themselves, that their ruling on Corban is one that went back to Moses himself.

So, not shifting the goal posts.

InitialPC
@hglundahl You are shifting. And judging from the ratios its looking like others are seeing it to.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@InitialPC Be disingenious if you like ...

Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Holdsworth and Me as Apologists


The following video is mainly on the Sacrifice of Abraham.

Here is Holdsworth's solution:

1. A test can benefit the person being tested and those who learn from the test, even if the examiner already knows the outcome.
2. Abraham’s test teaches Abraham and the reader about his faith, and points forward to Christ’s sacrifice.
3. Therefore, God’s test of Abraham can serve a meaningful purpose even if God already knows how Abraham will respond.


I'm not against that, just have something to add, and also comment on his intro.

Defending the Worst Thing in the Bible
Brian Holdsworth | 4 Nov. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmSbcZpU7HA


0:49 My background as an Apologist.

At fifteen minus a month, I arrived at a boarding school. I tend to say, on HP, whatever the pros and cons of fictional magic, it's still a boarding school story. Noting that Rowling never went to one.

I was at the time believing roughly like an Evangelical, minus the anti-Catholicism you find in some neighbourhoods, but tending to Lutheranism, since Lutheranism allowed Christians to resist Communist Revolutions and wasn't Pacifist.

I spent four years in two houses of that school. When I left, I was in the Swedish back then version of OCIA. Yes, I have a pre-Trad Catholic life too.

Part of the reason was, the strategy some had to push me away from the faith was pointing to Evangelicals owing the Bible to Catholics. "Oh, don't you say so? Well, I should probably be Catholic, then!" ... that's a very sunny résumé of dialogues that were often pretty grim, back and forth between debate and personal harrassment, like calling me a jerk or threatening me, or calling me a faggot, if I said sth they considered too right wing.

I had arrived a nearly sympathiser with Hitler. As I have part Jewish ancestry, you can guess what the not quite was about. I left a pretty solid sympathiser with Franco. You bet my saying right wing things wasn't a rarity. The second house was more quiet, but I already had Apologetics in my system. And there was one guy who had smoked weed in the Catacombs of Paris, before being sent up. So, more quiet, doesn't mean no occasions.

For some reason, the Sacrifice of Abraham didn't come up very often.

In recent months, I made a calculation on when the Arabian desert ceased to be green and lush. I concluded that Abraham might have blundered and nearly killed Ishmael, except for the miracle, while sending him to a place he thought was still liveable.

When Isaac later met Ishmael, perhaps it saved Isaac's life that Abraham had nearly killed him too.

Some bring up people who have certain mental conditions and kill their own, I think Hercules is a better butt of that rebuttal ... he actually did kill wife and more than one child with her, prior to precisely the twelve labours.

5:33 The initiation, it isn't into something like Freemasonry?

Including Catholic approved parallels. Knights of Columbus or things ...

Sharing by Eva Vlaardingerbroek


Eva Vlaardingerbroek Takes Aim at EU Migration Policies
The Financial Express | 3 Nov. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKVMMSOsjis