Friday, May 15, 2026
Ascension
HGL's F.B. writings: A Heliocentic Heckled the Ascension of Jesus · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Reflection on the Ascension · Ascension
Does Jesus Still Have His Body?
Dr Taylor Marshall | 15 May 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rONXdT5F51k
Next question is obviously where is this Body of the God-Man.
"Only on the altars" is obviously wrong.
I hold, in Empyrean Heaven, above the sphere of the fix stars, probably Heavenly Jerusalem is right above the coordinates of Earthly Jerusalem.
Heliocentrics have a problem and as a consequence disunity.
An SSPX priest in St. Nicolas invoked the immortality of risen bodies as a solution. Jimmy Akin said sth like "not our three-dimensional space, but like it in respect of capacity of receiving bodies" ... the obvious solution is Geocentrism.
Thursday, May 14, 2026
Quora Prevents Questions About the Mother of Preston Davey
New blog on the kid: Preston's Death · Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Quora Prevents Questions About the Mother of Preston Davey
I tried to add this question:
Who Knows Who the Mother of Preston Davey Is, and Why She Was Set Aside?
I do not get it published, but when I push the button, I get:
This question should be more general. Try starting your question with 'What is...', 'How do I...' or 'Why does..
Papacy and Geocentrism
What JESUS Teaches About HIS Church! | The Jimmy Akin Podcast
Jimmy Akin | 14 July 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG-URS075N0
7:43 So, Caiaphas = Shebna, Cephas = Eliacim.
Call it replacement theology or not, at least it teaches "translatio sacerdotii" very clearly.
13:45 I sense a little pique about my position.
We would agree that Paul III (?) over Urban VIII bound in regards of banning not just putting the Sun at the absolute centre, but also having Earth move, annually or daily or both. And that they were successors of Peter, indeed given the power to bind and loose.
You would say "John Paul II" was successor of Peter and had the power to loose, and he did so in 1992. From experience, I have seen people state he went further and bound, namely in § 283 of the CCC. In 2001, I was one day a parishioner in a reverent Novus Ordo parish (I hadn't renounced SSPX, but they don't hold that "normal" curates and bishops steal authority with a non-pope, nor that the Novus Ordo is always invalid).
I was promoting my YEC position to a newer convert (after 1990, so he did promise to agree with current positions of the magisterium, even non-infallible ones, and implicitly even non-traditional ones). He told me, showing me that paragraph, that I was wrong.
In Paris, also, even before going Sede and Conclavist, while attending SSPX Masses, I met this attitude from people in "normal" parishes, like the ones hosting breakfast for homeless in St. Ambroise' parish house.
My solution is, Wojtyla was not Pope. Meaning, the office is or was empty, and if it was empty someone else could be elected. RIP, Pope Michael I. Vivat, Pope Michael II.
No, I Was Still Not Wrong About This
- Q
- Did Latin speaking continue after the Western Roman Empire fell? How much did later Latin speaking missionaries and colonists understand of these older lost Romani Latin dialects?
https://www.quora.com/Did-Latin-speaking-continue-after-the-Western-Roman-Empire-fell-How-much-did-later-Latin-speaking-missionaries-and-colonists-understand-of-these-older-lost-Romani-Latin-dialects/answer/Hans-Georg-Lundahl-2
- Answer requested by
- Nick Certeza
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- Studied Latin (language) at Lund University
- Ascension Day
- 14.V.2026
- First, I don’t think there is any term like “Romani Latin”. Romani means an Indic language that came to Europe in Gipsy Caravans, a fairly Romantic, but not altogether Roman fate of a language (but they did dwell a while in East Rome, Byzantium).
You presumably mean “Romano-Latin” or “Romance Latin”.
Second, the answers are:
- yes, just as English would be spoken in the US, if the US were overthrown, however, the exception is Roman Britain, where only the upper class were really Romanised;
- I don’t know what era you mean by “later” … up to 800 AD, this was the standard way Latin was spoken, but in Gaul, comprehension by foreign priests was limited.
- Between c. 800 and 813, a foreigner was hired to teach people in Tours to speak Latin properly. Blessed Alcuin succeeded in making the Latin of the clerks comprehensible to English or Italian visitors …
- … but as a side effect, he made it incomprehensible to the people around there. Hence the decision in 813 (when Alcuin was dead) to not be content with a Gospel reading in Latin, but add a sermon explaining it, in Romance.
- This decision allowed priests to actually study how common people spoke, so as to come really close. Imagine standard English was for some reason rebooted and you suddenly had to speak to people from the Ozarks or to people using Ebonics in their very own way.
- By 880 or 890 they were so good at it, they wrote the first song in Old French, the song of St. Eulalia of Mérida.
- The same process was repeated with c. 200 years’ delay in Spain and in Italy.
- After c. 1100 in Spain or Italy, there was no dialectal Latin left that was represented by written Latin, except perhaps in the country between France and Italy. In whereever Romanian was spoken (Romania or Albania, opinions differ), there was no written Latin left. So, after 1100 or at latest 1200, there was no place left where a speaker of Medieval Ecclesiastic Latin, an Aux-Lang invented accidentally by Alcuin, would have met dialectal Latin and it would still have been written as Latin.
Reflection on the Ascension
HGL's F.B. writings: A Heliocentic Heckled the Ascension of Jesus · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Reflection on the Ascension · Ascension
Jesus Ascended on a Cloud—The Mind-Blowing Secret No One Talks About | The Jimmy Akin Podcast
Jimmy Akin | 11 May 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgMt8lh0914
Jesus went to a place that is above the sphere of the Fix Stars (the latter probably one light day up, could be two light days) and like the Earth, unlike anything from Fix stars to Ocean streams, immobile.
That place has the same coordinates up there as Jerusalem here.
The voyage between upper atmosphere and that place would be intermediates where He was using immortality and therefore invulnerability.
"our knowledge ... is different from theirs"
Two people can have different degrees of knowledge of a topic. But a duly specified question, they cannot have different knowledge.
If two people think:
- exh A, Empyrean Heaven is above the fix stars, which are a sphere somewhere above that of Saturn (or of Pluto)
- exh B, fix stars or simply stars aren't in a sphere, like a shell, they are in a possibly somewhat spheric volume, with distances like 100,000 light years
then, at least one, possibly both, of the exhibits is doing sth else than knowing.
That one of them is (mostly) in the past doesn't change this.
3:49 Archimedes, two light years?
Is the subtitling automatic and automatically correcting "light days"?
I'd actually say, the space up to the fix stars is two light days across.
I looked up the Sand Reckoner. It seems Archimedes thought the distance up to the fix stars as being 10,000 times the radius of the earth, or in other words, the sphere of the fix stars has a diameter that's 10,000 times the diameter of the Earth.
A light day is 25,902,600,252 km, two light days are 51,805,200,504 km.
However, divide that by 10,000, you get 5,180,520 km. The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km, c. 407 times shorter in one of the three dimensions.
Wait, I was not counting his universe beyond the sphere of the fix stars.
4:34 Wait.
Radiance seems to indicate the sphere of the fix stars or the Empyrean Heaven just beyond is 10 light days up, not just 1.
Ascension to Pentecost, He arrives in Heaven and sends the Holy Ghost, Who, being immaterial, has no travel time.
If my "one light day" had been correct (it could still be correct for creation week, just no longer for Ascension), then He would have ascended 1/10 the speed of light.
However, since Hebrews 1:3 calls Him the radiance, that would indicate He ascended the exact speed of light. Meaning the travel distance was 10 light days.
5:27 You are aware Hubble's "discovery" builds on accepting things like Sirius being 8 light years away, which builds on accepting the parallax measure of 0.35 sth arc seconds as a parallactic indirect view of Earths own supposed movement in the distance of 2 Astronomic Units?
In other words, if Galileo was wrong, so was Hubble.
6:55 "Spiritual realm rather than a physical one."
Jesus still has the same body He rose in. It's a physical body, that could eat fish and show forth the wounds, since it's the same body He was born and died in. Ave Verum Corpus natum would make no sense on some Evangelical theory of Jesus now having an "entirely spiritual resurrection body" ... which I think was condemned in the IV Lateran council, the explanatory creed Firmiter credimus.
Given Jesus has a physical body, He has physical dimensions. Given He has physical dimensions, they are in a physical place.
And as we also believe Mary is up there (see last or upcoming August 15th), physically risen, there are right now at least two human living bodies that obviously need physical dimensions around them.
So, as a Catholic, I definitely wouldn't go to "Spiritual realm rather than a physical one." I heard one of the Vatican II "Popes" held such an opinion, I'm not invoking him either as a saint in Heaven, nor as an authority on Earth.
7:21 These bodies are extended in three dimensions.
If you read up the Eucharist in the Summa, on an Altar, Christ's body is present under the dimensions of bread and wine.
The own dimensions are present with Him, but not touching the surrounding space. However, there is a place where He is present in His own dimensions, that being Heaven.
9:33 "this humanity meanwhile hides him from the eyes of men"
Not from the eyes of Mary.
9:58 "which was pictured as being up from an earthly perspective"
What was the worst word in that sentence, especially as to time form or tense?
I'd say, "which is up" (and leave "from an earthly perspective" understood).
Seriously, what God communicated then cannot be improved on. Not from new revelation. Not from new science.
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
I'm Not Bringing That Darkness To My Readers
Are you bringing darkness into your household?
Christine Niles | 13 mai 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ0s0cTcJcw
Just in case you were thinking of me.
1) I don't consider my writing a full scale apostolate, it is writing, sometimes goofy and totally unconnected to spirituality, and contains apologetics.
2) I do not engage in pornography, whatever my enemies have said about me.
In case you are one of those who read Παιδόφιλος; Ἐγώ; without knowing Ancient Greek (there have been a few).
1) It's in Ancient Greek, the language period ended c. 300 BC and a certain term was coined in the 19th C AD.
2) The title involves a sign called "Greek Question mark" ... "The Greek question mark (Greek: ερωτηματικό, romanized: erōtīmatikó) looks like ;. It appeared around the same time as the Latin one, in the 8th century. It was adopted by Church Slavonic and eventually settled on a form essentially similar to the Latin semicolon." (I used a semicolon to type it) So the title actually means "Pedophile? Me?"
3) I answer the question first from what the compound would naturally mean in Ancient Greek (opposite of Pedophobe) and stated I want to have many boys, like Jacob.
4) I also drop the tongue in cheek at the end, and state I'm not erotically interested in prepubescent boys. You can infer that's also valid for prepubescent girls.
So, if that's what the blockade is about, drop it. Goes for you and a few more in the Vatican II Sect, who know my existence, know I write and refuse to refer directly to my writings. No, I don't have to earn being a writer by living the life of an apostle, but I am also not engaging in porn. Some would count erotic hypnosis* there, doesn't work that way for me.
Your Vatican II Sect has pretty long been, here in France, engaged in blocking me from success.
Oh, helping me with spiritual struggle? Sure. I wasn't asking that.
I have a material struggle, where quite a few "Catholics" have been on the entirely wrong side, for very long.
* I still leave such videos out of my Blog 37, on Auto Hypnosis Experience. In case you wonder why I do any of that at all, I am deliberately exposed to fatigue and stress, and hypnosis helps with stress management and replaces sleep. This night, I had five different groups or persons pass loudly, and the fifth was the five AM van for the newspaper dealer facing side of the road, and when I woke, after that, no one seemed interested in allowing me to catch up with sleep someone else had lost me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)