THE ISSUE WITH CATHOLIC INFLUENCERS - A Vlog
Amber Rose | 9 Febr. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkaSIP3BHFc
OK, holding controversial opinions, is that also a sin?*
I suppose Our Lord was pretty controversial twice over in the temple.
4:59 Some converts have to get into Apologetics instantly, as per school or family.
I was, when arriving at SSHL for ninth grade, a basically Evangelical Apoologist. When I left after twelfth grade, I was a Catholic one.
With some school mates, minutes of apologetics was the most peaceful interaction we had.
I was only received after leaving High School, since I graduated in 1987 and was received in 1988.
Now, this kind of thing can happen online. I think Sips with Serra and the Jewish Catholic are in this kind of position.
And in fact, well before the internet existed, a certain Chesterton who was already doing apologetics was received in, I think, 1922. Writing was his career, he couldn't just stop and he had to explain why he left the Anglican communion. In 1922, he denounced Eugenics, before Pope Pius XI did so in Casti connubii. In 1923, he wrote a booklet on St. Francis of Assisi, and in 1925 he wrote Everlasting Man.
Another case like that was a certain John Henry, future Cardinal, Newman. However, in his case, he was given the explicit order to write before getting instruction. One often forgets that Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine is what reflects the Anglican deciding to become Catholic, while that was fresh in his memory, not the Catholic case as it would be presented by a well instructed Catholic.
"I 5:38 mean, it does, but you're not like 5:40 authoritatively trying to speak on the 5:42 church. You know what I mean?"
The exact same thing is true about Apologetics.**
Trent Horn would be in a very great pickle if his pretence that Cardinal Baronius had said "the Bible doesn't teach us how the Heavens go" in the connection of the Galileo affair had been made authoritatively on behalf of the Church.
Cardinal Baronius had died before the Galileo affair, Galileo made the quote but didn't say what highly placed Church man, it's dubious if Galileo had even met Baronius, and I think the earliest person to pin it down to Baronius (a good apologist against Protestants and a holy disciple of St. Philip Neri) was in the 19th C. Perhaps the Anfossi affair.
[end] As you multiple times referenced "the Catechism", can I hope it's that of St. Pius X, or Baltimore?
Or the one of the Council of Trent?
* She mentioned rage bait is. ** They are also not speaking authoritatively.
Other possible criticism of me. I supposedly get my information from Social Media, which is getting clicks by feeding me what I believe. Basically what Ali-Marie Ingram is saying: |
