co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Showing posts with label Snarky Jay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Snarky Jay. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 4, 2026
Abolition of Man
S9E18 – Abolition – Ch. 3, Pt. 1 ("Man's Conquest of Nature")
Pints with Jack | 3 March 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJP-JBNg1P4
19:02 Further reading? Chesterton. ALL you can get across.
Not least What's Wrong with the World?
22:10 Anyone of you saw Snarky Jay's video on how Hollywood degraded the mentor archetype?
1977, Obi Wan Kenobi. Death of a mentor is major trauma (confer Gandalf in Moria, 1954). 2025 films, death of mentor is a sigh or relief.
I compared US statistics for 1977 and 2025 (yes, they were already in), and given the shrinking percentage of a typical mentoree age (20 to 24) and the increase in percentage of typical mentor age (all from 60 up), anyone in mentoree age is up against, not sure I recall the US stats correctly, but this was the case for France between 1968 and 2025, twice as many potential mentors. And any oldie defining otium cum dignitate, especially the cum dignitate part, as being a mentor, only has half as many mentorees to pick from.
So, yes, CSL was on spot. People contracepting are opting to get the next and overnext generations more subdued than they were.
(When we speak of generations, what CSL predicted about a "generation X" if I recall correctly, has been diluted over two generations, boomers and the ones called X).
26:57 Eugenics was alive and well before the Nazis.
Pope Pius XI condemned it in 1931, before the Machtübernahme. Casti connubii.
Lenin had a research project, which fortunately Stalin and Lysenko cancelled.
If Britain didn't get forced sterilisations, in the 20's or 30's, it was not thanks to CSL who came to the forefront in WW-II, it was thanks to Chesterton and Belloc. But some states of Canada already had it and four Nordic countries at least had it. Dito some states of the US.
31:08 The internet, unusually, actually gives us more freedom ... for as long as no admin disconnects one.
[Unlike Malcolm Guite, I'm actually offline most of each 24 hours, since I access internet on borrowed computers, cybers and libraries]
Sunday, August 3, 2025
Mentor / Mentoree Dynamics Changing with Age Pyramid
Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Replying to advice from Cameron Riecker · Mentor / Mentoree Dynamics Changing with Age Pyramid · New blog on the kid: Is There Traditional Property in the Digital Sphere? · To Whoever Tries to Tell Me I Write "Wrong" (Not Meaning I Am Wrong About a Subject, Which Would be a Matter for a Debate)
HOLLYWOOD KILLED the MENTOR Archetype... And It’s RUINING Stories.
Snarky Jay | 1 Aug. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uFzivpfrBY
Generation proportions or age pyramid.
US 2025 vs US 1977, "mentor age":
| 100 +, | 0.0 / 0.0 % | vs | 0.0 / 0.0 % | |||
| 96 99, | 0.0 / 0.1 % | vs | 0.0 / 0.0 % | |||
| 90 94, | 0.2 / 0.4 % | vs | 0.1 / 0.1 % | |||
| 85 89, | 0.5 / 0.7 % | vs | 0.2 / 0.4 % | |||
| 80 84, | 1.0 / 1.3 % | vs | 0.4 / 0.8 % | |||
| 75 79, | 1.7 / 2.0 % | vs | 0.8 / 1.2 % | |||
| 70 74, | 2.2 / 2.5 % | vs | 1.2 / 1.6 % | |||
| 65 69, | 2.8 / 3.0 % | vs | 1.6 / 2.0 % | |||
| 60 64, | 3.1 / 3.1 % | vs | 2.0 / 2.3 % |
One section of the "mentoree age":
| 20 24 | 3.4 / 3.2 % | vs | 4.6 / 4.7 % |
Case in point. I'm 56, soon 57. I'm a writer and would love an editor. Sorry, publishing house, in French that's "éditeur" ...
Some of the crooks who infiltrate my online readership think of me as a mentoree.
I just got a mail from a certain person on the site Story Grid who told me, it would be wiser as to writing, first to practise, then to perform.
He is definitely mostly into novel writing, and I'm an essay writer.
He thinks my claim to being a writer lies in a mostly abandoned novel project and that all the essays I produce are just a distraction.
And he is so confident that my lack of success must come from lack of practise. First the equation of writing with performing music is pretty atrocious. Second, there is a reason why certain guys hate my stuff, and it's not stylistic. It's a high disagreement degree on what content I should produce.
Yes, you heard me right. Some people are so much at a loss for finding mentorees age 20 to 24 that they go to someone more like 55 to 60 (nearly going on mentor age) ... who has practised writing, while writing, for the time since 2001.
Or, some people hate my message, and they find their claim to offering their services as a mentor credible. Other possible cause for lack of success, I'm being painted as a mentor in search for mentorees, which obviously alienates the age in which I could win converts (without necessarily being much of a mentor).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)