Joe McClane Approximises the actual words of St. Irenaeus

Will you be DUPED by the Antichrist?
Joe McClane | 11.XI.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB5ivbe4yLs

"so he's going to come under a 7:03 different name because it would be just 7:04 too obvious otherwise"

Are you taking it from St. Irenaeus or from Luz de Maria?

I did not see that in chapters 28, 29, 30 of book V.* They are online on New Advent. Perhaps you meant this sentence:

Moreover, another danger, by no means trifling, shall overtake those who falsely presume that they know the name of Antichrist. For if these men assume one [number], when this [Antichrist] shall come having another, they will be easily led away by him, as supposing him not to be the expected one, who must be guarded against.

The thing is NOT that he will come under a false identity (apart from getting worshipped as God is one).

The thing is however, some might calculate about one name, fix their expectations on that, and then another name actually fits equally, and they hadn't expected that.

While theoretically the Antichrist could come under a false name, it is more probable he will be overlooked for other reasons. Why so?

These men, therefore, ought to learn [what really is the state of the case], and go back to the true number of the name, that they be not reckoned among false prophets. But, knowing the sure number declared by Scripture, that is, six hundred sixty and six, let them await, in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom, [let them learn] to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, having a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation

"True number" = 666 and NOT 616. The quote comes after a discussion of why 616 is not the correct number.

"The division of the kingdom in ten" = actually, St. Irenaeus is presuming this is the division of the Roman Empire in ten, or sth similar, but it could also be the addition of ten originally independent kingdoms (or presidencies or whatever) to each other. Keep and eye on EU and BRICS.

"he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, having a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation" = well, the Antichrist will take over.

Did we see sth like the medical profession in a certain pandemic acting that way?

Add up the five cases of Apollon in Greek, and you find 2666.** And in some Christian interpretations, Apollon, Asklepios, Hygieia and Panakeia were actually a human family, and they were saying they were saints, this is how in the Renaissance the doctors were allowed to swear the Hippocratic Oath. Swearing by these four persons was considered as the equivalent of a Brewer swearing by St. Gambrinus. Hence, "Apollon" does fulfil the condition of being a human number, the gematria of the name of an actual human person.

Btw, hope you didn't wear a mask on your "forehead" (the Greek word can mean the area as in a "faceshield") or an attestation of vaccination in your cell phone usually in your right hand ...

8:47 The text of St. Irenaeus does not specify "in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem" and also not "a Jew from Dan" ...

It only says "in the temple of God" and "from Dan" ...

* Here:

Chapter 28 The distinction to be made between the righteous and the wicked. The future apostasy in the time of Antichrist, and the end of the world.
Chapter 29 All things have been created for the service of man. The deceits, wickedness, and apostate power of Antichrist. This was prefigured at the deluge, as afterwards by the persecution of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.
Chapter 30 Although certain as to the number of the name of Antichrist, yet we should come to no rash conclusions as to the name itself, because this number is capable of being fitted to many names. Reasons for this point being reserved by the Holy Spirit. Antichrist's reign and death.

** My calculation: Gematria of Apollyon / Apollon

End Times?

Here are two videos with this in mind, with my comments.

Is the Antichrist in Jerusalem, RIGHT NOW?
Joe McClane, 13 Oct. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PNEJ4Ffadc

0:27 My hopes are for the Yanuka to convert.

I don't think he's the Antichrist.

Remember Yitshaak Kaduri.

1:36 Deceive even the elect.

In order for the Yanuka to fulfil this, one would need to suppose nearly all of the elect are inside or very close to Judaism.

Take a look at someone who's generally admired by Christians.

2:17 "He has not claimed it yet"

Neither did Yitshaak Kaduri.

"performed many miracles"

So did Yitshaak Kaduri, and his last words are answering who the Messiah is, by an anagram spelling out Yeshua.

3:18 I think there was a Yanuka who was proficient by age twelve and surprised the learned in a still standing temple.

He's my hope that this Yanuka will not be the Antichrist.

6:10 Could St. Timothy have been another Yanuka, and could he have made miracles prior to St. Paul converting him?

II Tim 3:

15 And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy scriptures, which can instruct thee to salvation, by the faith which is in Christ Jesus

16 All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice, 17 That the man of God may be perfect, furnished to every good work.

[16] "All scripture,": Every part of divine scripture is certainly profitable for all these ends. But, if we would have the whole rule of Christian faith and practice, we must not be content with those Scriptures, which Timothy knew from his infancy, that is, with the Old Testament alone: nor yet with the New Testament, without taking along with it the traditions of the apostles, and the interpretation of the church, to which the apostles delivered both the book, and the true meaning of it.

8:30 A certain man reputed to be Orthodox Christian, who has more in common with Kirill than just that, had a mother named Shelomova in maiden name?

I don't know where Taylor Marshall gets it from the Antichrist will be born in fornication.

I know a prophecy from St. Bridget he'll be the son of an apostate bishop (spiritual son of Kirill?) and of a false Jewish virgin (mother Russia losing her innocence in 1917 due to the Jewish part of the nation?). But that by itself does not spell out direct fornication in the conception.

9:20 I think Taylor Marshall is conflating his own interpretations with the actual texts of the prophecies.

"From a modest nation" — I think this means ...

And after friendships, he will deal deceitfully with him: and he shall go up, and shall overcome with a small people.
[Daniel 11:23]

Doesn't necessarily mean he will be a citizen of that small people.

"he willfeign himself as the leader of the Covenant" — I think this means

And he shall confirm the covenant with many, in one week: and in the half of the week the victim and the sacrifice shall fail: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and the desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.
[Daniel 9:27]

However, in this case Taylor Marshall is following a Protestant reading of this.

In Catholic exegesis, confirming a covenant with many refers to Jesus doing so at the Last Supper.

11:36 Perhaps millions of Orthodox Russians and Catholic Mexicans and Protestant Germans, Scandinavians, English becoming Atheists ....

In this context, the stats I see for Christianity are still lower for Russia than for Ukraine.

They have risen, I think my memory is correct.

12:17 You can't call him a pretender Messiah if he did not claim that title...

12:33 If he had made the disparaging comparison with Jesus himself, that would obviously be a bad sign, but since he hasn't made the claim, that's unlikely.

19:04 Taylor Marshall considers he will be in the "Third Temple" (if that's ever built).

Dimond Brothers consider the main Temple of God in the New Testament era is St.Peter's Basilica.

Both would kind of fit the Biblical prophecy, but only in so far as first being a temple of God, which we know of St. Peter's in Rome, but can suspect is not the case with a rebuilt temple under non-Christian precepts.

Pope Francis JUST REVEALS The Antichrist Has ARRIVED!
Nature Discoveries, 22 Oct. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLRJB3Sv6iU

9:16 I'd agree that Antichrist's Empire is a revived version of some kind of Roman Empire — but which one?

Not Caesarian Rome, since I have held that the Caesar's are (each in turn, with few exceptions like Nero and Joseph II) "ho katekhon" (The Holy Spirit could be "to katekhon" since in Greek He is "To Hagion Pneuma", while it is "ho katekhon" which is taken out of the way, which I think happened in 1918).

Both Antiochus Epiphanes and Pompey came to the Holy Land as representatives of the Senatorial Republican Empire.

Its Antimonarchic slant really made it different from the previous kingdoms. It once or even twice got laws from ten kings ruling together, Decemviri legibus faciundis.

9:53 Revived Senatorial Empire : the rise of Republics from 1776 and 1789 to 1848 and 1917 ...

With a prequel in Cromwell, whose Calvinist spirituality very well fits my view of the Leopard Beast. Kaiaphas, Mohammed, Calvin, Desaguyliers. Jews, Muslims, Puritans, Freemasons.

One can say this rise of the Republics also corresponds to the taking away of three horns — Caesar, Constantine, Charlemagne, for instance.

11:08 Relying on social media or wiki is not taking one's views from AI. The information is still produced by real men of flesh and blood.

I do not do ChatGTP.

15:21 As some are vessels of the Holy Spirit.

This is why "ho katekhon" can't be He, He is not taken out of the way.