co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Fr. Jason Charron spoke
Why Antichrist Must Stop the Eucharistic Sacrifice
Fr. Jason Charron | 2 Sept. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvtL9j43uM8
My Pope does not agree that the Missal of Paul VI is valid.
His name is Michael II, if you wish to correct me, take it up with him.
Apart from that, I have no beef with what you said.
I have stated that the Roman Caesar was "ho katekhon", I could argue that Christ in the Eucharist is rather "to katekhon" (bc thuma is Greek for hostia), but the function of a Christian Roman Caesar was anyway primarily to protect the worship of the Eucharist. So that's a quibble, not a beef.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment