Begley, 2017, My Response, 2018

"Media Ignored" 1,500 Pedophiles Arrested Since Trump Took Office"
Paul Begley | 28.II.2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Cm0DQzQA8w

I

0:40 This was more than a year ago, and by now you would be able to know how many of the arrested "pedophiles" were also actually condemned for statutory rape, child porn, or whatever real business ("pedophile" is a buzz word) the arrest was supposed to be about.

1500? 750? 375? 187? 93? Fewer?

Of those not condemned, in how many cases was there so much remaining suspicion that whatever office was held before, the suspect was removed from even after clearance?

Citing one of your sources:

Unreported: 1,500 pedophile arrests made nationally since Trump took office
By World Tribune on February 26, 2017
https://www.worldtribune.com/unreported-1500-pedophile-arrests-have-been-made-nationally-since-trump-took-office/

Crokin noted some of the major arrests that have been made since Trump took office:

On Jan. 27 authorities arrested 42 in a human trafficking operation in Tennessee.

How many of the 42 were certain to be accomplices in it?

On Jan. 29 authorities announced that 474 were arrested in a statewide California human trafficking operation and 28 sexually exploited children were rescued.

With 28 children, wonder how many of them were children or how many just underage, I wonder how many of the 474 were at last certain to be involved?

178 people were arrested in Texas for sex trafficking in sting that operated in January until Super Bowl Sunday.

How many of these have been cleared?

On Feb. 14 the Polk County sheriff announced that 42 were arrested in Florida in child pornography related cases.

Were all possessing child porn on computers?

Were all condemned for possession of child porn?

Btw, 474 is an interesting number. A six letter word, if it has value 474 in UPPER CASE, it will have 666 in lower case letters, as per ASCII. Why? Any English letter and a lot accented ones too (not Polish bared L, though) will have lower case as UPPER CASE+32. And 6*32=192, 474+192=666.

As I recall, SAWRON (Welsh spelling of Sauron) in all lower case as sawron would be 666.

Rereading Book of Three, I came across "Horned King" - now HORNED KING (with space, fictional character of LLoyd Alexander) is 777, but HORNEDGOD (without taking note of usual space, non-fictional wiccan name for Satan) is 666.

So, even if some were indeed cleared after the Jan 29 2017 bust, the total of 474 is symbolic.

Those of them who were guilty are arguably fairly Satanic ...

Now, I don't think these cases alone add up to 1500 though.

____________
0	4	2		1	5	0	0
4	7	4		-	7	1	6
1	7	8		=	7	8	4
0	4	2
____________
5	0	0
2	2	0
0	1	6
____________
7	1	6

Nope, did not, just to a bit less than half ...

II

2:42 Back in 1995, in SC, a girl of 12 quit school to legally marry a fairly old man.

She would by now be both widowed and remarried.

Now, the problem is, Clinton heard of it, so he said, he would change laws, this would no longer be possible.

So, marrying before 16 is now illegal in most states, and I think that includes SC. I actually tried to check, when a girl just turned 16 and she was resident of SC. I had the hots for her, she didn't for me, apparently, so I'm still single.

Now, do you consider me as a guy who should be rounded up bc of my fighting an uphill battle to change laws back so 12 year olds can marry and quit school?

Or do you think it was rather Bill Clinton, who, by forbidding girls and boys 12 - 16 to marry have caused a lot of sexual desperation which in view of 1 Corinthians 7:9 should not have been provoked, and by doing so, pushed some of these into ways that were uncautious and made them exploitable? Thereby of course enabling the exploiters you are talking about.

Btw, I didn't read about the case in 1995 in some creepy child porn secret publication, I read of it in a girl's mag called FRIDA, as I recall. Sold in perfect legality and openly in Sweden.

And why was I reading FRIDA in 1995? Did I identify "as a girl"?

No, I had just once again relapsed in a porn addiction (not child porn, perfectly legal adult porn), and I wanted to get out of it into an affair, so I wanted to get to know girls better already at a distance ... so I exchanged porn as in porn for girl's mags with occasional porn effect on me.

I wonder, were you hoping I would be number 1501 arrested as a pedophile?

I know there ARE people around reading me, and sometimes the readership looks so well organised, it looks more like people watching out in a detective story than like normal fandom of a blog.

When for one blog, top 10 posts have for one 24 h period views numbered as ...

15	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	14
01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10

...and another one has ...

04	03	02	02	02	01	01	01	01	01
01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10

... and a lot more views in total than the 18 for those posts ...

I tend to think, the readership is extremely well organised - like policemen of InterPol or sth?

New blog on the kid : Yes, the Week Says People Read My Blogs
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2018/10/yes-week-says-people-read-my-blogs.html

This is a post involving, for fun of normal readers (if any left) links to much viewed posts, but where viewer stats are given with numbers. For first stat, a week, Russia had very many. For second stat, 24 h, US had twice 17 (marked xuij) and once 34 (marked xxxiu), while France and Germany each had a total of xuij and a total together of xxxiu.

21, 11, 13 and 12 are other numbers that by themselves and by multiples came up. Ukraine had a total of 132, which is 11*12. It had one blog viewed 12 times (marked XII) and another one 33 times (in Italics).

I think possibly each of them, certainly all together are overrepresented as compared to chance occurrence of such numbers, so, yes, my readers are VERY well organised.

III

Speaking of sex trafficking and high up ... are foster homes and orphanages being looked into?

I'd say a lot of children - not young teens, but real pre-teen and for girls under 12 actual children - may have been abused bc in foster homes, where the foster father or foster brothers (both of foster family and other foster "children" no longer actual children) have been abused.

Also a lot of young adults have been there, and have been getting a sex début normal as to age (over 14-12 limit) BUT within foster family.

Anecdotic. I sat on a long trip bus, I overheard a conversation, it was between two boys at least one of whom was a foster "child", neither a child, both teens, they talked about that situation, it was last millennium, can neither recall names (neither gave any to each other, and I was not involved) nor date.

Not too bad one concluded.

How so? He had had his first sex with another foster child of same family - one point - and also, more certain than first I am not conflating with another story - second point : if he was moved around the country, it helped him get contacts, a network.

This is what the Swedish CPS was helping him to.

Think this might be sth for Trump to take a look at?

Legalised child trafficking is still child trafficking, and sometimes the uses of it are not legalised even.

Not to mention, the CPS version of child trafficking is an offense to IV commandment:

"Honora patrem tuum et matrem tuam, ut sis longaevus super terram, quam Dominus Deus tuus dabit tibi."
[Exodus 20:12]

Honour THY father and THY mother ...

IV

5:35 My little hunch on why mainstream media did not cover the 1500 arrests?

Here:

• some would have thought Trump was encouraging hysterics to do unwarranted arrests, and wanted to wait till they were sure some were actually convicted
• and some while not so, would have considered it a propaganda stunt by Trump, whom they hate.

I would like to know, do you know anything about how many of the 1500 were then convicted? And how were if so convictions later covered in mainstream media?

V

6:21 Donald Trump rescuing 28 children is actually greater news than arresting 1500 suspects of diverse "pedophile" crimes (the word as commonly used is a buzz word, right?)

VI

7:20 "not a good one"

"In the interview in a January 2016 episode of the podcast Drunken Peasants,[113] Yiannopoulos stated that sexual relationships between 13-year-old boys and adult men and women can "happen perfectly consensually", because some 13-year-olds are, in his view, sexually and emotionally mature enough to consent to sex with adults; he spoke favourably both of gay 13-year-old boys having sex with adult men and straight 13-year-old boys having sex with adult women.[114][115] He used his own experience as an example, saying he was mature enough to be capable of giving consent at a young age.[110] He also stated that "paedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old, who is sexually mature" but rather that "paedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty."[114][115]"

I am taking Milo's statement from wiki.

Milo Yiannopoulos : Alleged support for paedophilia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos#Alleged_support_for_paedophilia

• 1) Milo is confusing question of heterosexual and homosexual relationships involving one adult and one thirteen year old. Why? Bc the buzz word pedophilia treats both as the same thing, which they are naturally not.
• 2) Milo is arguably wrong on 13 year olds being "mature enough" for homosexuality, it would be the exploitation of a weak moment they should normally later regret, however, I am not sure statutory rape is the right solution, older laws against sodomy involved heavier penalties for an adult partner if the younger one was under a certain age.
  
  Bosey was perhaps not an innocent victim, but even so Oscar Wilde had some reason to be in prison, as such.
  
  
• 3) Milo is however not just arguably but definitely right about when the 13 year old person is a girl.
• 4) Was taking the statement as straight face, seems he has later said (same article) it was irony or humour. No hard feelings over that, what I said applies to if he had said it straight face or to whoever would actually say so straight face.

Again, "pedophilia" is a buzz word. Mixing the homosexual hebephilia which is a sin against nature, with normal hebephilia and both with "paedophilia proper," sex with or sexual desire for those not yet in puberty.

It is a useless word which is used to blur issues.

However, I can identify with why media would rather cover Milo than the 1500 arrests. If 1500 were condemned, that would be great news, supposing they were all guilty of real predation or sin against nature (sex with or sexual pictures of people under puberty, i e actual children, or homosexual hebephilia).

But they were back then not all condemned. However, if Milo had not later retracted, he could have made a real buzz for a somewhat candid and actually not totally wrong statement, which would severely disadvantage those who would want to keep the buzz and blur on the matter going, as it has been since Clinton federal wide and so, and even before in very many quarters (though not all of SC).

VII

8:58 "but they want to keep the dirty little secrets away from the public"

Like dirty little secrets of Protestants and Atheists arguing badly?

HGL's F.B. writings : Ghosts?
https://hglsfbwritings.blogspot.com/2018/10/ghosts.html

HGL's F.B. writings : "I will explain why geocentrism is wrong if you don't post my words elsewhere."
https://hglsfbwritings.blogspot.com/2018/10/i-will-explain-why-geocentrism-is-wrong.html

And of some Muslims arguing even worse?

Répliques Assorties : Contre Deedat
https://repliquesassorties.blogspot.com/2018/10/contre-deedat.html

And of an internationally concerted tracking of a writer as potential criminal (perhaps "pedophile" whatever that means next time), involving also a blockade against normal people reading him, by spreading rumours?

I'm not sure they are quite alone...

VIII

Btw, I would agree it's the last days, we are arguably more than seven years before Doomsday, but I don't know how much more.

A PS to Pope Michael, if such he be, I published this and posted a link on his wall after trying to see if he would condemn my stance on consent. And while he did not, he removed the discussion. So, here are the words added under the link I posted on his wall:

Since you tried to silence a discussion which very much is necessary for the common good of Christian societies and since such discussions are NOT for closed doors between masonic initiates, as you seem to imagine ...