Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Just in Case Anyone Confuses me with Derrida


Peter Hitchens Handled First Ten Minutes Very Well (My Comments Start at 11:08) · Just in Case Anyone Confuses me with Derrida

Why French Postmodernists were Pro-Paedophilia in the 1970s
26th Oct. 2021, The Living Philosophy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwLyP-vSnt0


1:06 It is not necessarily a defense of paedophilia, since most of the girls and some of the boys that age would no longer be children. I mean, relativeley many girls would have had first menstruation, and some boys first ejaculation by 13. Which makes it hebephilia, except for the cases when it is between young people who are both that age.

Renata Yuuki
I did at 12 and was a child very curious about sx

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@Renata Yuuki "as child" = before that?

According to Catholic scholasticism, you were no longer a child at 12.


1:33 And I suppose having girls able to marry in France up to 2006 at age 15 is also to be understood in the light of 1968? I mean, Napoleon Bonaparte who raised the marital age of girls to 15 was so obviously a pal of Derrida and Foucault et consortes, and same thing with the guys who stated (quoting one of them, you guess which one) it was OK to marry from 14 for boys and 12 for girls:

"I answer that, Since marriage is effected by way of a contract, it comes under the ordinance of positive law like other contracts. Consequently according to law (cap. Tua, De sponsal. impub.) it is determined that marriage may not be contracted before the age of discretion when each party is capable of sufficient deliberation about marriage, and of mutual fulfilment of the marriage debt, and that marriages otherwise contracted are void. Now for the most part this age is the fourteenth year in males and the twelfth year in women: but since the ordinances of positive law are consequent upon what happens in the majority of cases, if anyone reach the required perfection before the aforesaid age, so that nature and reason are sufficiently developed to supply the lack of age, the marriage is not annulled. Wherefore if the parties who marry before the age of puberty have marital intercourse before the aforesaid age, their marriage is none the less perpetually indissoluble."

Now, explain how a time capsule arrived with disciples of Foucault back into the 13th C. pretty please?

4:06 Are you sure Summer of Love in 1967 was all that big a thing in France? In US, it obviously was, with the hippies ...

Peter Mackie
I doubt if it was. The scene in France was much more political. Amsterdam and Copenhagen were the two hippy centres in Europe.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@Peter Mackie Precisely.

This being so, I doubt the Summer of Love contributed all that much to Paris May of 68!


4:56 Obviously these guys were not quite into the recipy of St. ... 13th C. Scholastic, still letting you guess ... of actually letting someone start as adult a thing as marriage at age 12 for girls or 14 for boys. These guys, regrettably, were pretending that the girls they had just towsed and made pregnant were still children, not fit to be mothers ... like France to this day has c. 1000 pregnancies with mothers under 15, and 772 of them end in abortion, per year ... (it's like one JRRT aborted every year, since 772 is the ASCII gematria for JRRTOLKIEN).

It may also be mentioned, even just those few abortions for mother being under 15 are more numerous than the Muslim terrorist related deaths in France per a year.

9:22 Oh, by the way, as long as you cannot document lots and lots of these guys doing what ... Matzneff ... did not do, namely marrying the girls that they had had sex with and keeping with them until they were dead themselves and the "childbrides" if you will something like widows in the thirties or forties, that is not the side I am finding myself on. JFYI.

Monday, June 27, 2022

Carrey quote


Jim Carrey's Speech NO ONE Wants To Hear — One Of The Most Eye-Opening Speeches
16th June 2022 | Motivation Mentors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB2nWAAuXpA


"not the least of which is, that you can fail at what you don't want, so you might as well take a chance at doing what you love."

God help me not to take the mark!


Here is, first, Katherine Albrecht:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Albrecht
Dr. Katherine Albrecht on 'DNA Tracks'
13th March 2015 | CBN News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84NRnQj9OgY


And here is Emma Thorne taking on a children's book by her:

Terrifying Christian Book for Kids | "I Won't Take the Mark" 📖
25th June 2022 | Emma Thorne
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8BIH8-8ydY


4:24 Have you checked up on the actual rights and freedoms of clients of child welfare and psychiatry before assuming slavery is gone?

What about penal slavery, when you get so and so many years of prison?

4:49 A possible realisation, if it comes back.
Masks or vaccine certificates. Masks are worn on the face, and "metopon" in Greek is less restricted than just the area above the eyebrows, and certaificates are shown by a cell phone, usually in the right hand. But where is then "man" whose number is 666? The med corps swears an oath to Apollo and if you add up the five Greek cases of Apollo, you get 2666. Hebrews have a habit of mentioning only non-millennial numbers, so the 2000 are ignored. Wait - isn't Apollo a god? Well, some Greek gods were also first of all men. And the Catholic bishops who back in the 1400's 1500's decided you could swear the oath like that argued, Apollo and his relations Asclepius, Panacea and Hygiea were a family of very pious healers, so one was swearing by pre-Christian saints, a bit like a cobbler swearing by St. Crispin was swearing by a Christian saint.

So, does it mean all doctors are bad? No, of course not. But it means the med corps is not a role model to wear on your right hand held cell phone (CELLPHONE adds up to 666 exactly in ascii) or on your metopon.

Toastbrottitan _
That's a good example of madness.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
Why?


12:53 Your comment doesn't take into account how tyranny works.

Some guy in Germany was perfectly good in 1933 to 45, he was just forced to be Antisemite ... and so he contributed to force others to be so too and to the rounding up of Jews. Without such "perfectly good people" Hitlerism would not have worked.

Take a look at the guys over here in France who have been driving for others on busses and in groceries and bakeries to be forced to wear a mask ... when you think the kind of thing you obey is "normal" this means the guy who opposes it openly becomes "abnormal" ...

18:29 "How come he fucked it up the first time?"
How come He allowed some of us to fuck it up the first time? Free will and God respecting it.
The second time, all have already made their choice, those who made a bad one won't be able to push it and those who made a good one will no more be pushed.

J. C.
So free will won't exist anymore?

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@J. C. Not the same way as now.

Now on earth, we have freedom to chose our way, then we will have freedom to enjoy or suffer what we chose.

J. C.
@Hans-Georg Lundahl In what way, then, will free will exist?

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@J. C. As the freedom to enjoy our choice.

And of doing acts within it.

J. C.
@Hans-Georg Lundahl Then why didn't your god just create everything with that type of free will from the get-go without the possibility of evil and suffering?

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@J. C. Because then they would not have had an own choice to either enjoy or suffer.

J. C.
@Hans-Georg Lundahl But why is that important?

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@J. C. Because, without that, the unchanging state would not be a type of free will.


19:31 The real question for me is, why is there a new earth?

I mean, the inside of the Earth will still contain Hell. The blessed will still be in Heaven (above the fix stars). What is the surface of the Earth good for? I'd say, for reliving memories.

"doesn't make any ... sense"

perhaps not to a Heliocentric ...

20:12 John was in AD 90, when exiled to Patmos by Domitian, the last survivor of those who had seen Jesus risen from the dead.

If he was adult in 33, he was not going to be pristinely young 57 years later.

22:52 [taken down] You know that before the war, Putin was getting a bit big with a vaccine, called Sputnik V. As with Astra-Zeneca, every single dose is disactivated viruses, and as with Astra-Zeneca, the viruses were cultivated on fetal cells. From an abortion in the 70's.

B t w ... Putin has three versions for adding up to 666. V POUTINE - like V. PUTIN, in French and _pointless_ - WLADIMIRA (genitive and accusative of WLADIMIR, if you prefer that spelling) - VLADIMIRB (B = II, which he is both as ruler of Muscovy and in his known family).

23:23 If He is in control ... why was I exposed to Lib Christian and Atheist bullying in school? Why was I refused homeschooling when both I and me were OK with that?

Well, God allows His enemies exactly so much fun with His own, before He defends them.

24:06 You don't think there was some sense in Bishop Clemens von Galen telling German Catholics they couldn't participate in Eugenics or Euthanasia, even if God had allowed Hitler to take power?

26:00 What about politically possible? Post-Cold-War? Global agreements?

Including those recommended by WHO...

And while a tattoo would be technologically possible, this would hardly make much sense (as yet).

It's difficult to impose sth purely arbitrarily, let alone get masses worked up about disagreement, so you can start killing opponents, and it is pretty certainly some type of pragmatic reason (real or more arguably sham) behind it.

That's why a simple tattoo is unlikely.

27:27 I don't know your experience of your teens.

If I had been with ma, and told to refuse discos with hand stamps (or discos tout court) I might have got involved with some serious Christian girl and be married.

I was sent to a boarding school, I took such stamps, I went to such discos, and I am still a virgin at 53.

29:17 "weird, horrible, objectionable person, who argues with everything"

If we didn't have more and more things reminding of the mark, why would a resolve to refuse to take it add up to arguing with everything?

I was in prison. I was doing the task of adding paper clips to papers. Somewhat weird ones. In plastic. And with a dotted triangle on it.

I counted. 36 dots per side. Do you know how you make a triangular number? n * (n+1) : 2. Put in 36 for n. 36 * (36+1) : 2 = 666

Some guys who produced paper clips in Sweden thought it a great idea to push prisoners to put paper clips with 666 dots on them on paper. [This was back in 1998 - divide that by 3]

Saturday, June 25, 2022

Gatekeeping is gatekeeping


Censored! Something Bad Is Coming! I Tried To Warn You!
24th June 2022 | Lisa Haven
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W42AUBHzkI


6:48 I have been serving as a one man army against Commie lies like:
  • evolution, heliocentrism (already a liberal lie before commies)
  • eighth graders can't be ma's and married
  • anyone who for any reason is pregnant and can't be a ma should get abortion, and who isn't yet pregnant contraception
  • only chance of gay and lesbian people of sex is "gay marriage" (on the contrary, see Josh Weed and my countryman Svante Pääbo, even though the former failed)
  • school compulsion, CPS, psychiatry
  • anti-Catholic and anti-Monarchist views of the history of Western Christendom
  • fake news in linguistics, some of which tend to credit some lies (determinism is no longer how linguists see sound "laws" and intelligent design has a place in changes between languages, in other words, in the life of one language, anatomic men who develop without a human language in the parent generation can't invent language)
  • false views on the relation between history and science, and between history and myth (see my debate with Kevin R. Henke on Creation vs Evolution)


So far, God has sent you a one man army, and you have done gatekeeping like leftists against Mr. Trump.

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Peter Kreeft Again


Dr. Peter Kreeft | How to Win the Culture War | Franciscan University
22th Nov. 2011 | Franciscan University of Steubenville
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm08x8YiuXk


7:45 Philanthropy and euergetism seem related.

Antiochus VII Euergetes, Seleucid king, reigned 138–129 BC
Attalus III Philometor Euergetes, king of Pergamon, reigned 138–133 BC
Mithridates V Euergetes, king of Pontus, reigned 150–120 BC
Nicomedes III Euergetes, king of Bithynia, reigned 127–94 BC
Ptolemy III Euergetes, king of Egypt, reigned 246–222 BC
Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II, king of Egypt, reigned 169–164, 144–132, 126–116 BC
Telephos Euergetes, Indo-Greek ruler, reigned 75–70 BC
Tiraios I Euergetes, king of Characene, reigned 95/94-90/89 BC

Now read Luke 22 ... I think you can guess what verse ...

[ὁ δὲ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· οἱ βασιλεῖς τῶν ἐθνῶν κυριεύουσιν αὐτῶν καὶ οἱ ἐξουσιάζοντες αὐτῶν εὐεργέται καλοῦνται.]

If you prefer the term "philanthropy" I can mention there is a Greek saying "philanthropos ho Theos" meaning, perhaps, that assuming the title philanthropist is kind of taking a title of God for yourself.

8:47 "since the essence of sainthood is unselfishness" - is it?

A saint is never selfish? W a i t ... have you heard of the sisters Martin?

One of them wanted Our Lord just for herself and the other ones wanted Our Lord and their sister just for themselves ...

15:22 into the video.

Peter Kreeft's voice is agreeable all through, hard to imagine him as Screwtape.

At the computer beside, for some minutes by now, another voice is smattering, a near bald man surrounded by high generals in a Russian square somewhere.

Peter doesn't grow weary of sounding nice and some other Vlad doesn't grow weary of sounding angry, irritated.

The square looks a bit surrounded by red, by the way ...

And despite title being in Hungarian, it seems that the video recorded an event from May 9th 2022 - victory day for WW-II.

19:04 so is the universe, by 7161 years, according to the Roman Martyrology ... did I hear you mentions some other number?

That other number is over here promoted by calling it sophistication and nuance.

41:07 Some women want abortion because their daughter didn't bother about birth control.

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Tom Zimmer and Donald Trump


Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Tom Zimmer and Donald Trump · New blog on the kid : Why I Don't Do Conspiracy Reporting · Some May Feel the Wall is Not God's Will · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Great minds think alike ...

1983 Premonition: Trump Leads World Back to God. 5.6 minutes
6th July 2020 | Wayne Harropson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGN9m11uOms


Original longer video unavailable, closed account.

I met myself Tom Zimmer in 1986 - before the Assisi sacrilege, on Pentecost vacation, during the novena. He gave me Hope 84, to Honor Our Lady's Assumption.

Peter Hitchens Handled First Ten Minutes Very Well (My Comments Start at 11:08)


Peter Hitchens Handled First Ten Minutes Very Well (My Comments Start at 11:08) · Just in Case Anyone Confuses me with Derrida

Peter Hitchens DESTROYS Pro Ab0rt, Adam Rutherford
25th of May 2022 | Pints With Aquinas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyffzNR2R5U


11:08 "teenagers are gonna have sex"

Some definitely are. In the century of St. Thomas Aquinas, most teenagers who had sex were married, and most teenagers who had sex and weren't married tried to get married. In some cases, however, they financed child-rearing by prostitution. Please note, here, if Alessandro Serenelli and Maria Goretti had lived under the Papal State rule, Alessandro could have simply asked Maria to marry him a few months later.

His attempt of seduction (which led to the murder when failing) was probably meant to exploit an Italian Monarchy exception for pregnancy. Because the Italian Monarchy was the first country (or second after Prussia?), even before the Soviet Union (second or third), where marriage was legally delayed to 18 for both sexes.

11:17 "I'm saying people shouldn't have sex outside marriage, that's my belief"

Mine too. Relegalise teen marriages where they have been made illegal, that should save some unborn babies from abortion!

11:30 "To a large extent, yes it will"

The ages of faith with a (fairly) strong moral system (though not Calvinist or Jordan Peterson strong, please!) were ages specifically allowing for teens to marry.

They were very definitely not times when marriage was legally delayed to 18 and socially well beyond and when a strong moral system helped millions and millions all over the board, all classes and social subcultures to avoid having sex before that. If that's what Peter Hitchens and Matt Fradd dream of, they have a problem.

I Cor 7:[8] But I say to the unmarried, and to the widows: It is good for them if they so continue, even as I. [9] But if they do not contain themselves, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to be burnt.

And note, in Supplementum Tertiae Partis, the impediments for marriage are in these Quaestiones : IMPEDIMENTS: The impediments of marriage in general (50) and in particular: error (51), slavery (52), vows and orders (53), consanguinity (54), affinity (55), spiritual relationship (56), legal relationship by adoption (57), impotence, spell, insanity, incest, and defective age (58), disparity of worship (59), and wife-murder (60). Impediments which supervene marriage: A solemn vow (61), which affects an unconsummated marriage; and fornication (62), which affects a consummated marriage..

And the key one to this question is Question 58. The impediments of impotence, spell, frenzy or madness, incest and defective age, and the key article is Article 5. Whether defective age is an impediment to marriage? and here I cite the whole corpus:

I answer that, Since marriage is effected by way of a contract, it comes under the ordinance of positive law like other contracts. Consequently according to law (cap. Tua, De sponsal. impub.) it is determined that marriage may not be contracted before the age of discretion when each party is capable of sufficient deliberation about marriage, and of mutual fulfilment of the marriage debt, and that marriages otherwise contracted are void. Now for the most part this age is the fourteenth year in males and the twelfth year in women: but since the ordinances of positive law are consequent upon what happens in the majority of cases, if anyone reach the required perfection before the aforesaid age, so that nature and reason are sufficiently developed to supply the lack of age, the marriage is not annulled. Wherefore if the parties who marry before the age of puberty have marital intercourse before the aforesaid age, their marriage is none the less perpetually indissoluble. [my emphasis]

11:53 The "horror and dislike" for premarital sex was in Catholic societies very different for the case if the man married the woman after making her no longer a girl, or if he refused.

Read El Alcalde de Zalamea. The nobleman refuses to marry the "mayor's" (Alcalde's) daughter, whom he has seduced. She isn't noble, you see.

The Alcalde (let's recall that the Spanish administration had "mayors" who were also judges, like "kadis" in the Muslim world) then executes the noble. Not for personal vengeance, but for keeping seduced girls in the capacity of getting married to the seducer!

Two playwrights wrote on it, both Calderon and Lope de Vega. It was a real event. So, "El Alcalde de Zalamea" is equivocal as to what literary work, but non-equivocal as to what event.

The reason why Paris had prostitutes was, partly, to allow teen boys (but also husbands on business journeys away from wives) to make babies with harlots, who legally got a vacation with pregnancy and childbirth, instead of doing it with virgins, where the duty would be to marry her. And yes, I mean in the century of St. Thomas, in the century of St. Lewis IX.

12:03 I agree the Middle Ages had a better society, but I am (as Umberto Eco would be) somewhat more aware of what this better society was, than I think Peter Hitchens is.

If he thinks Puritan gone Victorian and just prior to the sexual revolution was better, yes, in a way, but also not in a way. It was better as fewer were aborted, but worse as making things unnecessarily hard on an as yet unwed mother.