co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, June 4, 2022
In support of JJ McCullough vs Bill C11
My opening statement opposing Bill C-11, the awful YouTube bill
2ndJune 2022 | J.J. McCullough
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4fuMKeGRMg
The rationale behind this bill is arguably a weary parallel with TV and radio broadcast over - for instance - Canadian (or French or German) territory.
If you want to watch TV1France, you had better not be too far South in Spain or too far East in Germany ... in other words, it's viewed by the exact country making laws about what their TV canals can broadcast.
But transposing the idea is obviously totally topsy turvy once you take into account that I can view JJ Cullough in France, someone else can do so in Germany, and yet another person in South America or Ireland, from the original youtube.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment