co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Sunday, October 9, 2022
Malachi Martin
Did Malachi Martin Leak The Real Third Secret Of Fatima?
7th Oct. 2022 | Return To Tradition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3AnjIpA44I
[on Malachi Martin's changing view of "John Paul II" - one comment]
19:40 Malachi Martin wrote Windswept House in 1996.
Pope Michael had been already elected, making "John Paul II" fully an antipope, an opponent to the real Pope.
And JP-II started making mistakes very blatantly in the early 90's, like directly endorsing (Leo XIII and Benedict XV had not done that, I have checked Providentissimus Deus and In praeclara summorum) Heliocentrism, directly endorsing (again, Pius XII had not done that, I have checked Humani Generis) the idea of conjugating Evolution Theory with Christianity.
Suddenly Fundamentalist Bible exegesis is attacked, and the Roman martyrology reading for Dec 25 changed (the old reading says the universe was 5199 years old when Christ was born).
And the attack on Fundamentalism is not an attack on Protestantism, old style. It has since then translated to pretending the Fundamentalism of St. Robert Bellarmine was not quite Catholic. It was. The early 90's attack was wrong.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment