No, My Apologetics is NOT Putting My Faith into Danger

Is it a Sin to Watch Protestant Videos?
Scholastic Answers | 26 Febr. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI2-5BrY2GY

We can agree that someone who said "the Catholic Church teaches that Adam had non-human pedigree, but this means God was putting Adam in the way of a most serious child abuse well before Adam had sinned, therefore we need not believe ..." insert the Catholic Church or Adam and Eve ... has lost the faith.

However, you can not apply that so as to say "IF the Catholic Church WERE to teach that Adam had non-human pedigree, that WOULD mean etc and therefore, this is not how God created Adam and also not what the Church teaches" is a loss of faith.

Very much on the contrary, it's a defense of faith.

0:25 Just mentioning, I never called you a retard.

Unless you mean retarded acquisition of correct theologumena compared to what is desireable in a channel such as yours.

But no, not retarded acquisition of normal adult intelligence.

0:40 On the day (discounting the Julian to Gregorian shift) 777 years passed between a burning of the Talmud before Notre Dame, Paris, and the burning of Notre Dame Paris.

Jews pretend God took revenge for the burning of the Talmud.

Do you think Jews did so, or God for complicity with the Talmud?

6:34 Do people who hold "Leo XIV" to be Pope and Mater Populi Fidelis to be a Papal Encyclical sin by denial of either Papal infallibility or Coredemptrix?*

"To give an example, I 9:29 myself have spent a few years reading 9:31 Protestant theology and do not 9:33 particularly suffer from sins against 9:34 the faith. Further, it is part of my job 9:36 to speak to those who oppose the faith 9:38 in order to provide answers that will 9:40 remove the force of these objections. 9:42 For me to read Protestant theology or to 9:44 watch a theology debate both has a 9:46 sufficient justification and places me 9:48 in no unique danger of sin."

Apart from the Protestant Theologian Prevost, I agree.

Is my case too, except I don't read Mater Populi Fidelis without a good reason.

12:13 Would you consider that someone is overdoing things, if he makes the syllogism:

• CSL was a heretic (didn't convert to Catholicism before dying 22 Nov 1963)
• HGL states he has read CSL
• therefore we can conclude HGL is putting his and other peoples' faith in danger, for no reason at all

Close quote, do you think he's overdoing things?

* Someone asked if I was Sede or Benevacantist, I'm Conclavist. Christian Wagner did an interview with Pope Michael I before he died, I think one with Pope Michael II too.