co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Friday, September 1, 2023
I'd Like a Second Opinion on the Kaph
This is a calculation that Tim Cohen made on "Charles Prince of Wales"
I had thought that prince was nasi or nasiy, something, and actually, in Genesis 34:2 I find this:
No kaph. And sin rather than samekh.
As you can see, other word occurrences don't end in kaph.
But perhaps the key is "modern Israeli Hebrew" being different from Biblical ...?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment