Pope Francis' Public Memorial And Funeral Take A Disturbing Turn
Return To Tradition | 26.IV.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QIPOdidC4s
4:40 Homeless are not necessarily sinners.
Heard of the Pilgrim of Loreto, Tom Zimmer?
Thomas Raymond Zimmer, 1926 to 2009 lived homeless, I thought in Rome, it seems to have been Loreto and part time Rome, I met him outside St. Peter's in 1986.
Obviously, in Rome mostly, we have St. Benoît Joseph Labre.
I'm queezy about two fairly traditional Catholics both endorsing the idea that if in any sense, permanent or ad tempus, you chose to be homeless, it's a sinful choice. Yesterday, The Religious Hippie (SSPX, I believe) interviewed a man who had been antinomial while homeless. Today, while I agree "very confused dudes" are sinners and prisoners on day leave are mostly sinners doing penance, when the category homeless are also involved, I don't think it makes sense to exchange the category disadvantaged for that of sinners.
The closest parish in Paris to where I have held my luggage most of the time since first confinement, already second winter was in a position to help me out of homelessness, but only offered conditions inacceptable to me. Mine were to them.
Their conditions: you can live in the apartment of a disabled or aged man. That way rent is cheaper. At the time I had money for 12 months in a cheap apartment without dorm sharing. And my condition of how to make an advantage of that was one they didn't want to help me out with.
9:13 I've seen livor mortis on my grandmother's face, the side she turned down, the morning when ma found her dead and notified me.
It wouldn't seem to match the gravity conditions of a face turned up, unless the greying is supposed to be the inverse, where blood is flowing from, instead of the obverse, where it is flowing to.
11:10 I obviously think Pius XII's discoloration can be providentially related to Humani Generis.
In Chesterton's time, he died 1936 under Pius XI, it was still a major no no to give Adam any kind of evolutionary origins. In Humani Generis, which seems to have precursors on less solemn levels starting in 1941, you get things like at least discussing the possibility and obviously, if a Pope says "you can at least discuss the possibility" there are people who will take it as "yeah, we can believe it" ...
The limitations in that time were very different from S. Joshua Swamidass who basically considers non-Adamites as people, they just don't have the supernatural and invisible extra that image of God is supposed to mean. No, in 1941, Pius XII or his men were perfectly clear, if Adam came out of the womb of a living being, that being was not his mother in a human sense. In other words, the idea involved God committing child abuse in order to create Adam. Guess what kind of things started happening in Netherlands and France in the 1940'?
13:21 Carlo Acutis seems, by contrast to appear incorrupt.
While his body appears to be incorrupt through the viewing glass, it is covered with a wax layer that is molded to look like his body prior to burial. This is not uncommon for the presentation of saints’ bodies.
Aleteia: Is the body of Blessed Carlo Acutis incorrupt?
https://aleteia.org/2023/10/09/is-the-body-of-bl-carlo-acutis-incorrupt
26:52 When it comes to some AI generated videos, it's obvious from the very monotonous accent.
For imagery, some very "faces like Botticelli" and somewhat blurred outlines and gaudy colours are easy to spot.
But on Quora, images with "I am disabled and afraid no one will notice my birthday" ... I was just told by someone "don't bother, they are AI-generated" ...
27:04 Could you take some time off reporting on the Church to make a tutorial about spotting AI, especially when it's photographic?
28:00 There was however a public exposition of the body of the late Mgr Williamson (ordained by Mgr Lefebvre in 1976, very famously consecrated by the same in 1988). His face showed no discolouring.
28:11 Being over concerned with medicine could be the image of the beast.
Apollon in the five cases added together is 2666. And the Hippocratic oath famously begins swearing by him.
In the Renaissance the Hippocratic oath was discussed, and one concluded its wording was OK, the family with Apollo and his children Asclepius, Salus, Panacaea, were a human family of physicians, righteous among the Gentiles in pre-Christian times, so, one could swear by them. In Nuremberg either Cobblers or Meistersinger swore by King David, also pre-Christian, though not a Gentile. This makes "Apollo" a human name.
That's one reason why I opposed certain mask mandates and v[accine] mandates.
No comments:
Post a Comment