Catholics Don't Believe in Parallel Humanities

Aliens, Catechism called "CCC" · Catholics Don't Believe in Parallel Humanities

Who scare Matt Fradd? (Wolves in today's "Professional Catholicism")
Daniel O'Connor | 23 April 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEPu4tN9g1U

1:59 Can I guess that Creationism is off limits with some?

Can I guess Geocentrism is even more off limits, as I think Levi J. Pingleton found out?

32:22 Could it be that he was after all told not to take you by his spiritual director after "Pope Francis" or someone close to him had got wind of the affair?

Bergoglio has pretty much avoided being the False Prophet by dying before the time when that man will be cast alive into the lake of fire.

34:59 From my experience with Rev. Anders Piltz OP Tert. it very much need not be "things could happen" (which is a threat), that was never how he tried to get me to cancel anyone, no, it was more like a) explaining the Trad movement (in an unflattering way, partly psychologising) or, when that didn't work, b) explaining my attraction to it in a psychologising way.

Can you imagine there are some people who would not like to encourage someone in an "ultimately unhealthy" neurosis? I think there are too many people who cave in to that kind of pressure, which isn't so much a threat as it is shaming.

36:49 On your channel, the oldest youtube is from 2010, your pilgrimage to Medjugorje, 10 Aug 2010.

39:04 the one truth

I think there is more than one truth he'll attack or try to do the opposite of, and so, there are more than one truth that could sabotage his rule.

I'm getting cancelled too.

Doctrinal: geocentrism, young earth creationism, not buying into mind being a byproduct of matter
Historic: I'm thoroughly pro-Middle Ages and pro-Historic Christendom, I also believe the "heroic legend" parts of mythologies are mostly true (in other words, your ancestor Conor Mac Nessa existed, as did his Druid Cathbhadh, as did Cúchulainn), canonic age 14 / 12 wasn't just a legal abstraction
Moral: against abortion, contraception, forced sterilisation, lobotomy, psychiatry, against school compulsion and for teens having the right to marry, legally
Procedural: I believe academic consensus sometimes is wrong and can be braved in polemics that don't follow academic protocol.

And obviously, one "human number" is 2666 which is the number of Apollo, if you add up the Greek letters of his name [all five cases], the one context when "Apollo" refers to a human rather than demonic idol being the father of Asclepius. One of his names (from a different context) is Apollyon, Homer called him so in Iliad song one.

"whenever you see something promoted 42:15 under the heading of oh aliens wouldn't refute Catholicism that is always just a 42:22 slippery and underhanded way of promoting the fundamental tenants of the 42:28 ET deception because the statement itself is a complete non sequator to truism cath Catholicism is absolutely 42:35 and certainly true so therefore nothing can disprove it you could put anything 42:42 in the blank and say it wouldn't disprove Catholicism and that's true statement and any tautology is trivial 42:49 in this case it's pointless so when people put these things up saying aliens wouldn't disprove the faith it is a 42:55 backdoor Trojan horse it's a way of defending the very deception that we're 43:00 discussing here"

Brilliant observation.

Note very well that some were interpreting Providentissimus Deus as "saying" that Heliocentrism wouldn't refute Catholicism. More recently some have taken that approach to Evolution as well.

As you may know, one common meaning of "Fundamentalist" is "I believe in the Bible and therefore Evolution and Millions of Years are wrong" or "I believe in the Bible and therefore Heliocentrism is wrong" ...

44:47 One item from the Middle Ages is when St. Virgil of Salzburg was under suspicion of heresy.

It's sometimes towted as evidence for "flat earth Christianity" which it isn't but here is the story.

It seems St. Virgil had used the word "antipodes" in the modern sense, a piece of land opposite to the piece of land you are standing your feet on.

However, in a previous discussion, St. Augustine had denied the existence of "antipodes" in a very different sense.

a) No one could have another origin than Adam and more recently Noah;
b) If it were possible to sail across the great seas East or West, we would have done so;
c) therefore whatever possible land could lie on the opposite part of the Earth would certainly be inaccessible from where we are, and therefore uninhabited.

St. Virgil got cleared of heresy when he clarified that no, he didn't refer to a parallel humanity. In other words, the affirmation of parallel humanities is sinful and heretical.

56:04 Please note, I once started writing a fan fiction on the Narniad.

You may know the premiss of CSL was a parallel incarnation. My fan fic specifically denied it. If Narnia was real, that would be Jesus, in His human body, present in Narnia under the species of a talking lion and NOT a parallel incarnation into a talking lion. Hence the chapter about Bethlehem is called "where Aslan was a lion cub" ...

Then I came to note, well, this doesn't only jar with CSL's premiss, but even with important parts of the story. I have not gotten any well formulated solutions, so the project is lying fallow for that reason, mostly since 2014 ...