co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Thursday, April 3, 2025
Judicial Overreach ... Sharing a Story
It's fictional, as per the disclaimer, but it typefies a certain type of behaviour:
Judge Fines Pam Bondi for Wearing a Cross—Then Uncovers Her Legal Brilliance
Elite Stories | 18 March 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX5ICKMErh8
It's even easier when people have to do with rubber rules than in a courtroom of normal proceedings (judges on liberties are not normal)./HGL
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment