co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questions on the Subject?
They are not meant to!
Most (I still think they are a majority) involve debate. I am answering the questions and arguments raised by the other debaters, as they come.
A very large minority are comments on youtube videos - and I am answering the arguments raised in the video, not the arguments you would like to know on a topic.
It could be the same, but also could not be. If you felt like asking the above question, you are probably one of the guys for which one of the posts or more of them have not coincided with your take on a subject.
If debate and commenting on videos doesn't interest you, I have other blogs, where I am mainly not doing that.
Three apologetic blogs:
Creation vs. Evolution, somewhere else, Great Bishop of Geneva!
Present main blog:
New blog on the kid
Longstanding geek blog:
Φιλολoγικά/Philologica
And the rest of them:
Huius autoris bloggi
Though some very few of them do have a similar structure to this one./HGL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment