I Didn't Find St. Hilary Condemned Me

A Saint's Warning About False Prophets And Hypocrites
Return To Tradition | 30 Aug. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST9e1GYhXzE

5:45 I'm noting a thing or two if someone would like to apply this to me, and judge me as one therein warned of.

Obeying the law of Christ.

But if they do not contain themselves, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to be burnt
[1 Corinthians 7:9]

I have done what I could to obey this and I'm being stopped.

Two. You mentioned false claims of knowing the future and presumably may have meant "date setting" ...

Hilary himself is known to have presumed the Antichrist was in preparation at the Court of Constantinople. In other words, he ventured a guess, no doubt an instructed guess, but nevertheless a guess, about when the world was ending. He was wrong, and nevertheless, he is St. Hilary.

In Lateran V, the ban on date setting, while referring to Matthew 24:36 or Mark 13:32, doesn't come in doctrinal context, but in disciplinary, namely in rules for preachers. No one says bloggers, vloggers or other essayists are bound by these.

So, if you try to get people not to widely read me, because you think me a "false claimant of knowledge" (which in this sermon wasn't even mentioned by St. Hilary), or because you think me a hypocrite, you are part of those who make it hard for me to actually start obeying God's law, including the cite from 1 Corinthians. This resumes both.

6:53 Today, it's very easy to get stamped as "pretending to be the only one who sees" ...

I yesterday claimed to see, not to the exclusion of everyone else, but of Uniformitarians, that Genesis 1 to 11 except the verses in chapters 1 and 2 prior to Adam's creation, have a very simple epistemology.

Heber saw Babel begin, after Noah died 350 after the Flood (using the martyrology reading for Christmas Day) and saw Babel end when his son Peleg was born 401 after the Flood. So, while he probably stayed away, and may have missed technical detail about whatever the "tower the top of which may reach into heaven" was meant to become ... I think Wernher von Braun did it ... he knew the general gist and arguably had a prophecy from which we have verses 5 to 7.

He died well after Sarug was born. Sarug died when Abraham was 50. Abraham probably started to write things down, given that a caravan leader had the capacity to dedicate a few camels to clay tablets or whatever and given that chapters from 12 on become more prolix, less easy to transmit by oral tradition.

Tell me exactly where this is in conflict with any dogma or traditional position of the faith, will you?

George Leo Haydock said pretty similar things on the epistemology of Genesis 3.

But possibly, you'll ignore this over X clergyman or Y expert or Z right winger telling you I'm a narcissist, and perhaps feeling yourself that an "attention seeker" or "clout chaser" should be ostracised. No need to put actual doctrine into whatever you think I'm doing wrong, since you have broadened the definition of what St. Hilary spoke of absurdly.

To Honour St. Maria Goretti

Theologians ATTACK St Maria Goretti's Purity
Return To Tradition | 10 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO3BRQshk3c

I would say, the piece by Philippa Haase is simply attacking the "demands made on victims" by elevating St. Maria Goretti as a model.

It's a bit like priests freaking out over elevating St. John Nepomuk or Bl. Andrew Faulhaber as models of martyrdom rather than divulging the secret of confession.

I didn't actually see any direct attacks on St. Maria Goretti's virtue.

I would not see her as a martyr for consecrated virginity, in the sense that St. Barbara was, but she was martyred for wanting to stay a virgin up to marriage. If Protestants became Catholics, certain purity rings would be inscribed "SMGPFM"

Dear St. Maria Goretti, Martyr, and dear St. Alessandro Serenelli, Penitent, pray for me!

Same Video, My Comments

New blog on the kid: Good News in Title, Bad News Later On · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Same Video, My Comments

Same video as on my main blog, here are my two actual comments, in context:

[One of the descriptions of how the hospital was corrupt.]

32:40 In Sweden, I have been to wards of mental hospitals, and my impression was generally (apart from the time I was very alone and very drugged) that 9 / 10 to 19 / 20 would be fraudulently diagnosed if it's to add up as "mad" or in older juridical parlance "non capax sui" ...

I'm not saying most were perfectly normal people. I'm saying whatever personality disorder there may have been, they were with very few exceptions not mad and should not have been kept in mental hospital against their will.

I had seen two of these before the day when I defended myself against a policeman lending a hand to psychiatry to get me there.

I was so utterly relieved that evening to be in a pre-trial detention ... looking it up, police custody, arrest.

[a crisis in the Church]

46:39 A crisis foreseen in Apoc. 18?

If Anyone Thought that "Leo XIV" was the Good Response to Trump ...

A Good Reason to Not be National Socialist, an Even Better One Not to be Communist, and an Excellent One to Make Peace with God · The World is Going to Hell "in a Handbasket" · If Anyone Thought that "Leo XIV" was the Good Response to Trump ...

Vatican Doctrine Chief Declares Catholic Teaching A Terrible Injustice
Return To Tradition | 14.IV.2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz33cZc8rRs

When Popes Drop Jesus and Presidents Play Messiah?
Fr. Jason Charron | 13 April 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brlG4mPZuz0

Anthony Stine on the Burial of Bergoglio (Whom he Calls "Pope Francis")

Pope Francis' Public Memorial And Funeral Take A Disturbing Turn
Return To Tradition | 26.IV.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QIPOdidC4s

4:40 Homeless are not necessarily sinners.

Heard of the Pilgrim of Loreto, Tom Zimmer?

Thomas Raymond Zimmer, 1926 to 2009 lived homeless, I thought in Rome, it seems to have been Loreto and part time Rome, I met him outside St. Peter's in 1986.

Obviously, in Rome mostly, we have St. Benoît Joseph Labre.

I'm queezy about two fairly traditional Catholics both endorsing the idea that if in any sense, permanent or ad tempus, you chose to be homeless, it's a sinful choice. Yesterday, The Religious Hippie (SSPX, I believe) interviewed a man who had been antinomial while homeless. Today, while I agree "very confused dudes" are sinners and prisoners on day leave are mostly sinners doing penance, when the category homeless are also involved, I don't think it makes sense to exchange the category disadvantaged for that of sinners.

The closest parish in Paris to where I have held my luggage most of the time since first confinement, already second winter was in a position to help me out of homelessness, but only offered conditions inacceptable to me. Mine were to them.

Their conditions: you can live in the apartment of a disabled or aged man. That way rent is cheaper. At the time I had money for 12 months in a cheap apartment without dorm sharing. And my condition of how to make an advantage of that was one they didn't want to help me out with.

9:13 I've seen livor mortis on my grandmother's face, the side she turned down, the morning when ma found her dead and notified me.

It wouldn't seem to match the gravity conditions of a face turned up, unless the greying is supposed to be the inverse, where blood is flowing from, instead of the obverse, where it is flowing to.

11:10 I obviously think Pius XII's discoloration can be providentially related to Humani Generis.

In Chesterton's time, he died 1936 under Pius XI, it was still a major no no to give Adam any kind of evolutionary origins. In Humani Generis, which seems to have precursors on less solemn levels starting in 1941, you get things like at least discussing the possibility and obviously, if a Pope says "you can at least discuss the possibility" there are people who will take it as "yeah, we can believe it" ...

The limitations in that time were very different from S. Joshua Swamidass who basically considers non-Adamites as people, they just don't have the supernatural and invisible extra that image of God is supposed to mean. No, in 1941, Pius XII or his men were perfectly clear, if Adam came out of the womb of a living being, that being was not his mother in a human sense. In other words, the idea involved God committing child abuse in order to create Adam. Guess what kind of things started happening in Netherlands and France in the 1940'?

13:21 Carlo Acutis seems, by contrast to appear incorrupt.

While his body appears to be incorrupt through the viewing glass, it is covered with a wax layer that is molded to look like his body prior to burial. This is not uncommon for the presentation of saints’ bodies.

Aleteia: Is the body of Blessed Carlo Acutis incorrupt?
https://aleteia.org/2023/10/09/is-the-body-of-bl-carlo-acutis-incorrupt

26:52 When it comes to some AI generated videos, it's obvious from the very monotonous accent.

For imagery, some very "faces like Botticelli" and somewhat blurred outlines and gaudy colours are easy to spot.

But on Quora, images with "I am disabled and afraid no one will notice my birthday" ... I was just told by someone "don't bother, they are AI-generated" ...

27:04 Could you take some time off reporting on the Church to make a tutorial about spotting AI, especially when it's photographic?

28:00 There was however a public exposition of the body of the late Mgr Williamson (ordained by Mgr Lefebvre in 1976, very famously consecrated by the same in 1988). His face showed no discolouring.

28:11 Being over concerned with medicine could be the image of the beast.

Apollon in the five cases added together is 2666. And the Hippocratic oath famously begins swearing by him.

In the Renaissance the Hippocratic oath was discussed, and one concluded its wording was OK, the family with Apollo and his children Asclepius, Salus, Panacaea, were a human family of physicians, righteous among the Gentiles in pre-Christian times, so, one could swear by them. In Nuremberg either Cobblers or Meistersinger swore by King David, also pre-Christian, though not a Gentile. This makes "Apollo" a human name.

That's one reason why I opposed certain mask mandates and v[accine] mandates.

Fatima and St. Bridget, Consecration and Muscovy-Russia

The Reason Third Secret Of Fatima Was Hidden By The Popes
Return To Tradition | 28 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EediP59dm20

0:30 Pope Michael I actually did consecrate "that country" alone, with all the two bishops in communion with him, who had ordained him and consecrated him bishop.

I would say the reason "that country" alone is to be named is, Ukraine already inherits the Medieval consecration of Kievan Rus' to the Blessed Virgin. A "that country" politically beginning in Suzdal and Vladimir* is cut off from that Medieval consecration by willing collaboration with the Tatars.

Our Lord told St. Bridget to tell the Swedish king to go on a Crusade against the heathen in Novgorod. My back then Novus Ordo second father confessor used this as proof the revelations of St. Bridget contain errors, since the population of Novgorod was in majority simply schismatic, Russian Orthodox. However, since then I have gathered two things:

• Novgorod was under the Tatars who certainly were heathen at this point;
• if Sweden had given the Tatars sth to do on the Novgorod front, there wouldn't have been Tatars catapulting plague death corpses into a Black Sea port, which then launched the Black Death in Europe.

My respect for the Revelations of St. Bridget is certainly unscathed.

My friend and benefactor Stephan Borgehammar, convert from Lutheranism like I, but later, and I had a debate about the identity of St. John the Gospeller. I suggested it could be Theophilus Ben Hanan, and he said, no, Our Lady had told St. Bridget that John "was a virgin" ... I defended it on the ground (I did some F-searches in an online text of the Revelations) that there is a distinction between how John the Beloved simply was a virgin, and how John the Baptist was a virgin who had never emitted semen. I took this as possible indication that John the Beloved simply lived as a virgin after Calvary. Why Theophilus? Well, with Orthodox Christology "God-Beloved" becomes "whom Jesus loved". Why not the son of Zebedee? Well, the son of Zebedee must have been effectively martyred according to a prophecy by Our Lord. The Beloved wasn't, as far as biographies go. The son of Zebedee must have fled along with the other, and later Peter turned around and followed from afar, but the Beloved went to the High Priests. That parenthesis aside, we both presumed the words recorded in St. Bridget are true. And that would include, as mentioned, God counting Novgorod as Pagan territory because of Tatar domination. Perhaps also because the old Slavic religion had something to do with the Tatar domination, as Novgorod was not the most eager to do what St. Volodimer the Great had done in Kiev.

That said, were the two bishops in communion with Pope Michael I sufficient? I don't know.

* And Tver. See Principality of Moscow

Devious Tactics, To Say the Least

My comment was immediately censored. Probably not by Anthony Stine.

Vatican Exposes Ongoing Marian "Miracle" As Fraudulent
Return To Tradition | 24.II.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTlHnTqsKmY

I think this airing of the video one hour ago was not the first.

I also think that I had commented on the previous one, and published a link to your video with my comments.

Now, I search for that post, it seems to have gone down.

It is a VERY serious thing to allege about someone else he's an alleged seer who needs to be tested for truth or falsehood of the prophecy, when that someone is actually a blogger who doesn't pretend to be a seer.

Don't take this down.

But if you do, don't try to get my copy off my blog. You have no valid copyright reason to erase a post where I link to your video and also show the comments I made.

Catholics have either been principal or accessory to Swedish shrinks, for years on end, and for years on end, it has deprived me of the readers who would have published on paper, gaining money for themselves and also for me.

The LEAST I can accuse Catholics like you of is passivity.

I am a Catholic, and Catholics have helped all the Anticatholic rabble there is to either make me their piñata (to borrow an image from Robert Sungenis) or to look good by comparison, as the ones helping me out while Catholics stand aside.

We are NOT united about who is the Pope. That does not equate to Protestantism. If you try to pretend it does, if you try to write Pope Michael I and his successor Michael II off as Protestants or to do so with me adherring to them, that is simply the tactics of the devil, who was a liar from the beginning.

Read Old Books, He Said!

The FALSE CHURCH OF ANTICHRIST According To Prophecy
Return To Tradition | 7 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7kzhiCaf6A

[quibbles]

5:14 Assisi was 1986 (after I had visited the Vatican), it was the consecration of four bishops that was 1988, by Lefebvre and Castro Mayer. / 33:31 The diocese of Linz was in Germany prior to 1864. It is now Republic of Austria.

10:16 this involves spiritual discernment we 10:18 are which is basically being Guided by 10:20 the teachings of the church and the 10:21 wisdom of scripture read old books read 10:24 the writings of saints read old books 10:26 that were published before the 1950s 10:29 those are your guides those are your 10:30 sure guides along with of course the 10:33 Bible and old 10:35 catechisms

10:34 But do you really want someone to take away teen marriages and angelic movers from St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa, young earth creationism from St. Augustine of Hippo and then Geocentrism from angelic movers (which make it possible) and from young earth creationism (where it's useful to the Distant Star Light Problem)?

Or do you only want someone to take away what your priest approves they should take away?

[highlight:]

this means you need to 11:20 know what the church taught through all 11:22 time and practice that in your life 11:24 whenever it's applicable this is the 11:26 surest way to avoid falling into error is 11:29 by knowing what the church has actually 11:30 taught on things or by being misled by 11:33 modern ideologies that contradict the 11:37 faith

12:26 Why I'm not praying for "Pope Francis" - I don't believe he is the Pope.

Other video, actually stream:

Bishops Blocking Trump's Program May Pay A HUGE Price
Return To Tradition | 7 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9wuSPmBqXI

22:27 Our Lord could not seek for refugee status in the Roman Empire, province of Egypt, since Judaea wasn't an enemy country or (anachronism) flagged for human rights abuses.

However, He did cross a border, from a protectorate, comparable to what Philippines or Guam are to Washington DC, to a province, comparable to any of the 50 states.

Judaea didn't have independent foreign policy, but neither did they have Roman officials, when Herod sent his army to kill infants. Judaea only became a province later, in 6 AD. The census in or just after 6 AD is so well remembered because it was in Judaea, sparked a revolt and that revolt is mentioned by Gamaliel in Acts and by Josephus.

This means, when Joseph went to Bethlehem for the census, it was a joke. His action was comparable to leaving a state to go to Guam or the Philippines to avoid the IRC.

The Holy Family was first tax evading (any Roman census officer in Bethlehem if ever would have been in 6 AD or later), then crossing a half and half "international border" (also anachronism) without doing the paperwork (the paperwork too is anachronism).

The Bishops who say "Our Lord was a refugee" are not lying.

And given the Christian Palestinians are descendants of the population Our Lord founded post mortem Acts 2 and 8 (uniting Judah and Ephraim), and that Muslim Palestinians are an offshot of that, calling Our Lord a Palestinian is about as anachronistic, and absolutely not false, as calling Mozart an Austrian.

Mozart was a German of the Holy Roman Empire, who immigrated to Vienna and thus to the Archduchy of Austria. His birthplace was Salzburg, an Archbishop acted as secular ruler and it was as much outside the Archduchy as Cologne was, though not as far outside. But Salzburg has later become part of the two Republics of Austria, and therefore, calling Mozart an Austrian is anachronistic, but not simply false. The same applies to calling Our Lord Palestinian.

So, it's not leftism, it's simply truth, He was born close to becoming a refugee, and He became after Resurrection the basically first King of Palestine.

22:31 No, he would have been going "from one part of the Roman Empire to another part of the Roman Empire" if He had been born after 6 AD.

He went from a protectorate to a province, the status is not the same.

If He had been born after 6 AD, the Gospel would also have been false, because Herod would no longer have been alive, and his successors would not have had the power to commit the massacre in Bethlehem. Stop contradicting the inerrant words of the Gospel.

22:50 No, comparing Judaea and Egypt to Oklahoma and Texas is certainly valid after 6 AD, it's a total no-go for anything while Herod the Great and then Archaelaus were in power.

For the actual year when the Flight to Egypt happened, it's like going from Guam to the US or from Philippines to US or (prior to Castro) from Cuba to the US. Protectorate to province roughly translates protectorate to state.

23:11 The crime of obstructing justice is involved in things like legal arrests on the purpose of serving justice.

Sheltering someone sought and not for an actual felony, would be a very minor form of obstruction to justice.

23:31 You are aware that your source is Nolan Rappaport?

// Immigration Law Expert and former Judiciary Committee counsel. Around 400 published immigration op-eds* //
// Nolan Rappaport is a lobbyist who lobbied for 1 clients in 2007. //

Lobbying firm: Steptoe & Johnson
Client: Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform

My source for the latter is the site Open Secrets.**

Now, I look them up. The fact is, they are not on the side of Teaparty. Nolan Rappaport could have given, not legal advice to bishops, but simply a kind of worst case scenario if Trump and Vance push criminalising one thing after another, and in the intent of perhaps even demonising Trump and Vance. I thought you had been studying political science?

* https://www.linkedin.com/in/nolan-rappaport-6250333b
** https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/lobbyists/summary?cycle=a&id=Y0000030840L

Will Hallow Be Banned? Protestant and Communist Malfeasance, If So.

Biggest Catholic Prayer App In The World BANNED
Return To Tradition | 3 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsL9fHVcA7A

I'm in France.

I know some things about France. Catholics are no longer an absolute majority, only a relative majority and even that only among those whose religion is recognised as one. 51 % are Secularists, which is not recognised as a religion, or technically, 51 % are Nones, but many of them would be Secularists. 29 % are Catholics.

Now, it so happens, Protestantism has a kind of deal with Secularism in countries where it is a minority.

Some Protestants are concerned that Hypnosis is occultism, simply as such, i e simply because it induces the alpha state or in some cases the theta state. They would take that as unauthorised access to the spiritual world, comparable to unauthorised communication with the dead, and therefore likely to get someone abused by demons.

They also have a very longstanding opposition to the Rosary. Not so much the Anglicans and Lutherans of Northern Europe, you will even find Lutheran "rosaries" without the Hail Mary, but with meditations on Jesus' life, and probably repetitive prayers.

Now, many of the Protestants I speak of would connect the two.

And when you are praying, speak not much, as the heathens. For they think that in their much speaking they may be heard
[Matthew 6:7]

This is the Douay in the online revision. The Latin is even clearer, it is about making speeches:

Orantes autem, nolite multum loqui, sicut ethnici, putant enim quod in multiloquio suo exaudiantur
[Matthew 6:7]

Multiloquium is pretty obviously about heaping together different phrases and never getting to the point. Not about repeating a short prayer, even to the point of a slight alpha state. St. Thomas actually considers a deeper hypnotic state desireable, he considers that a "consequent passion" (if you would call the hypnotic state a passion, I don't know, but it is comparable in some ways) makes the deliberate act more laudable if good or more reprehensible if bad. When discussing the humanity of "idiots" (i e people with Down's syndrome or similar) he said that they could continue praying without noticing a hand put in front of them, so, deep prayer. Probably he had tested while among the Benedictines in his teens. Now, the point is, the idea that repetitive prayer is good and alpha state at least in prayer is good, is a Catholic idea. It is not shared by Protestants.

Some Waldensians may be wary of it, because of so many not just Albigensians, but also Waldensians (though fewer) returning to the Church when praying the Rosary with St. Dominic. Calvin may have had a personal reason to be wary, if he had been homosexually abused while in a hypnotic state. One John Calvin (or Jean Cauvin) was branded in Noyon, where Calvin is from, in 1534, a year in which he could have been there at least for a visit. It could have been another guy, but ... if the person had been consenting very deliberately to sodomy, he would have been executed, not just branded. So, that person had presumably consented under circumstances lowering the ability to consent to things not foreseen before enterting in such state. One of the states being of course the hypnotic. John Calvin, the Reformer, unlike Luther, took away Confession totally, not just the general obligation. Confession is somewhat akin to hypnotherapy. John Calvin also went after Gregorian Chant and the Rosary, again things that involve a likelihood of alpha state, and when it comes to the Rosary, or repetitive prayers, he even inserted it in the Bible. Luther mistranslated Luke 1:28 and a verse of Romans 3. Calvin mistranslated Matthew 6:7. Here are the consecutive English versions that mention "repetitions", namely:

Also when ye pray, use no vain repetitions as the Heathen: for they think to be heard for their much babbling. 1599 Geneva Bible.
But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. Authorised King James

Bible Gateway leaves out earlier edition of Geneva Bible in NT published 1557 and the Bishops' Bible 1568.

The Geneva Bible was obviously a translation from Calvin / Beza in Geneva who had written theirs in French.

Now, Secularism places other religions instead of Catholicism or other traditional supernatural things. One of them is Progress, one of them is Medicine. Chinese and Protestants both have a dispropoprtionate influence in the Medical field over here.

So Chinese Communists and Calvinists target the alpha state and infiltrate medicine, Medicine then influences legislation, like we saw during the Covid Mandates.

On top of that, some in the Russian and Ukrainian, generally East European, expat communities in France would be perfectly able to repeat a Putin like blunder in going after Alex Jones (a Catholic in Chicago) in the purpose of going after Alex Jones (a Protestant and Conspiracy Theorist of Dallas). They would be perfectly able to make a spin on this and imagine that conspiracy theories to the level they would want to treat as pathologic paranoia are spread by the alpha state in the Rosary on the app.

They would also be perfectly able to base this on case studies about me, while my poverty has been used so I can continue to be an easy target for observers, while you guys have thought I shouldn't earn money of my writings anyway, so you don't owe me anything (except perhaps prayers, and there is a likelihood you would pray for the wrong things).

Questioning Manning

The Restrainer Of The Antichrist | Cardinal Manning
Return To Tradition | 19 Jan. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R387U5r-qHo

Who, before Manning, made this theory?

Because, the Haydock comment does not mention it.

While the comment should be on verse 6 and there is no separate comment on that, the comments on verses 3 and 4 do give a real comment on the question:

Ver. 3-4. First, &c.[2] What is meant by this falling away, (in the Greek this apostacy) is uncertain, and differently expounded. S. Jerom and others understand it of a falling off of other kingdoms, which before were subject to the Roman empire; as if S. Paul said to them: you need not fear that the day of judgment is at hand, for it will not come till other kingdoms, by a general revolt, shall have fallen off, so that the Roman empire be destroyed. The same interpreters expound the sixth and seventh verses in like manner, as if when it is said, now you know[3] what withholdeth, &c. That is, you see the Roman empire subsisteth yet, which must be first destroyed. And when it is added, only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way; the sense, say these authors, is, let Nero and his successors hold that empire till it be destroyed, for not till then will the day of judgment come. A. Lapide makes this exposition so certain, that he calls it a tradition of the fathers, which to him seems apostolical. But we must not take the opinion of some fathers, in the exposition of obscure prophecies, where they advance conjectures (which others at the same time reject, or doubt of) to be apostolical traditions, and articles of faith, as the learned bishop of Meaux, Bossuet, takes notice on this very subject, in his preface and treatise on the Apocalypse, against Jurieux. S. Jerom indeed, and others, thought that the Roman empire was to subsist till the antichrist's coming, which by the event most interpreters conclude to be a mistake, and that it cannot be said the Roman empire continues to this time. See Lyranus on this place, S. Tho. Aquin. Salmeron, Estius, and many others; though A. Lapide, with some few, pretend the Roman empire still subsists in the emperors of Germany.

Which was soon to become the emperors of Austria, then Austria-Hungary. When Haydock published, it was after 1806, but I suppose he wrote before that.

I would say the Roman Empire still subsisted till 1918. When Nicolas II and Charles of Austria were out of the way, you find Lenin, then his emissaries in Munich and Hungary (Lewien with Hitler, Bela Kun), and further SE, a massacre on Armenians starting soon after Charles' father and Nicolas II had started to take each other out of the way.

---

I would say, the function of the Restrainer is kind of akin to the function of Homeland Security. In other words, it uses violence and is sometimes unfair.

I would say, when Habsburg Emperors were acting against Jews in the 1400's and the 1600's, on suspicion of their fomenting Hussites, and on condemnation of sacrilege, the death penalties in the 1600's were not unjust, but severe in not taking into account the blindness of the Jews, the acts in the 1400's were actually unjust, the Jews don't seem to have had that interest in Austria.

That's the kind of thing that a secular authority sometimes does (the expulsion from Spain, though understandable, was also more than unusually afflicting to the exiles), and not at their most creditable.

It would be a mistake for the Papacy to take up that role, I don't think the Papacy can, since Christ's vicar doesn't become, as such, the vicar of Pilate. I'm not saying Popes weren't exercising it locally as secular rulers within the Empire up to 1870, but that's not the inherent function of the Papacy and also not a function the Vatican State as founded in 1929, when Pius XI signed it was NOT a continuation of the Papal states, can assume.

---

I'm very sure Manning wrote this before 1870, since he mentions Italy and Sicily (Kingdom of Two Sicilies) as two separate entities. I think his first reaction in that fateful day of 1870 (he may have been at the Vatican Council) was sth like "the katekhon is taken out of the way" ...

In other words, his view doesn't apply directly to post-1870 or post-1929 Popes, even if you accept "Francis" as being or "Benedict" as having been the Pope.

In a way, this view, taken this way, is also correct. WW-I and the end of the Kaiser of Austria and of the Czar of all Russia might not have come if there had been no Risorgimento and no setting aside of the Papacy in the secular sphere.

[tried to add]

There is a difference however between the Restrainer as Public Office with a Secret Agency of armed force, and the Restrainer as a principle of obedience.

Is It Licit to Point Out Who the Man of Sin Is or Isn't? Overall Yes.

New blog on the kid: I have Consistently Said, a) I am Catholic, b) I'm a Writer, c) I Intend to Get Married · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere:Is It Licit to Point Out Who the Man of Sin Is or Isn't? Overall Yes · All the Bible is Essential Doctrine, If You Have Time to Read

Breaking News: Bishop Strickland Challenges Bishops To Declare Against Francis
Return To Tradition | 7 Jan. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNK4SEekeEM

21:23 Sorry, what did you just say?

by the 20:58 way I thought I should reiterate this 20:59 because there's so many in my live chat 21:00 right now trying 21:01 to assume that political figures of the 21:04 B of sin um the church has 21:07 condemned Laymen, Bishops and Priests, anybody 21:11 from trying to identify the man of sin 21:13 based on the very simple reason is you 21:15 will be fooled by him when he comes if 21:17 you do 21:18 that don't play that game it's dangerous

I refuse to take "the Church has condemned" from an "everybody knows" or your priest's "I heard this in seminary" ...

A few years ago, perhaps as long as a decade ago, an Orthodox, i e a schismatic, said "we can ony safely identify the Antichrist" (or if it was "the false prophet") "if the Church as a whole does so" ...

No, the identity of the man of sin is not a theological point like fine but important shades of Christology. They are a practical point about the end times. It is also a conundrum, since there are chances a certain entity that rides the beast will be a false version of the Catholic Church. I e, in the end times, if not the Church, at least Catholics de jure belonging to it, will be divided. So, waiting for that ecclesial statement is tantamount to never identifying the Antichrist, and therefore to have no use for the actual directive in Apocalypse 13:18. One which clearly extends the power to do calculation, not to clergy, but to anyone who has understanding.

So, let's hope your priest was not referencing that Eastern Orthodox statement, if it was a tweet from Kirill or whatever it was.

Or you could be referencing a statement in Lateran V, which is disciplinary, and for the reasons stated above cannot be permanent. It was not formulated as a dogma. If it had been Church law already in for instance Patristic times, it would have been condemning a statement of St. Hilary of Poitiers.

So, I'd want to check with you where you have that "tout le monde sait" statement from ...

21:23 bis, it seems my previous comment on the issue disappeared:

by the 20:58 way I thought I should reiterate this 20:59 because there's so many in my live chat 21:00 right now trying 21:01 to assume that political figures of the 21:04 B of sin um the church has 21:07 condemned Laymen, Bishops and Priests, anybody 21:11 from trying to identify the man of sin 21:13 based on the very simple reason is you 21:15 will be fooled by him when he comes if 21:17 you do 21:18 that don't play that game it's dangerous

How does that even make sense?

a) How do you know that the Man of Sin is supposed to be in the future? Unlike the times of Lateran V, we live in a world without Roman Emperor, and the traditional understanding of "ho katekhon" the one withholding, in II Thessalonians 2 is, it's the Roman Emperor;
b) If identifying him correctly involves not being fooled by him, how does this restriction if it were really a ban, let alone a condemnation, in any way, shape or form help? Because i) if the ban is upheld when he comes, it blocks the purpose of identifying him, and ij) if the true Church is supposed to lift the ban, how will you identify the true Church? If Strickland said you could identify an Antichrist or a False Prophet, how would Michael Lofton not disagree? Or if Francis said one could, how could we be sure that you obeyed?
c) If not identifying him wrongly is supposed to help, well, Apocalypse 13:18 gives a criterium not fulfilled by everyone on Earth.

If we take the gematria to be in Latin alphabet and based off ASCII, I have calculated that there are for all combinations of 9 UPPER CASE letters c. 1 chance in 150 to add up to 666. However, the calculation is for ALL nine letter combinations which are pure upper case (a lower case letter has usually 32 more in value). From AAAAAAAAA to ZZZZZZZZZ. However, as the meaningful combinations are a selection, pretty random, from the possible ones, I think that any given person with any given name of 9 letters has no more than c. 1/150 chance to add up to 666.

This means that calculating ASCII combinations is a way of exonerating very many (I've so far exonerated Trump on this account), and for the record, I have a restricted, but more than two items, list of famous people who get 666 in upper case. The first of them to come on world stage was, though not yet with the gematria, Charles III. It also applies to any male heir of his.

A Welshman, as the PoW technically is, is safe. A monarch ruling from Buckingham or Balmoral is only safe if female. He's, in Swedish an "ENGELSMAN" but also a "skotte" ... the late Queen was "en engelska" and "en skotska" which has a different value. This is obviously a question for any male heir of his.

The second was Putin (WLADIMIRA in genitive and accusative, VLADIMIRB as in Vladimir B, Vladimir II, V POUTINE, like "V. POUTINE" but without the dot, also known as point, if he did something pointless in a French speaking country. He's still around. The third was "Pope Benedict" not just "Benediktos" in Greek gematria (500 + 150 + 16!), but also PAPABENTO and BENEDETTO, he's however not around any more. The newer ones after that have been BERGOGLIO, SEBASTIAN (Kurz, Maskenpflicht), who stepped back, and JRBIDENJR (J. R. Biden Jr.), now stepping back soon.

I'm leaving out where the gematrias are only lower case or only 616 or 665. Oh, just in case you wonder -- HGLUNDAHL is 663 and HANSGEORG is 670. I've checked.

When It's Heavily Centralised Whom I Can Have Small Talk With, Avoiding Small Talk is NOT a Personality Issue

The Love Of Neighbor In A Fallen World | GK Chesterton
Return To Tradition | 5 Jan. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPNaY-cWXXM

Chesterton may have a point about small talk.

This doesn't mean that everyone who refuses small talk is necessarily bad on Chesterton's views. There is such a thing as having too little sleep and there is such a thing as having a sore throat, and there is such a thing as not sharing the language if both are immigrants in Paris and there is such a thing as having already talked and knowing the other guys if for instance pro-abortion or likes to guide the conversation, which former he may politely avoid (which indicates small talk may remain small talk) and which latter is perhaps slightly bothersome if you have a sore throat and he asks you to answer things.

P L U S in the neighbourhood where I am, L O T S have gone way beyond small talk already, they have poked into my life, they have asked me if I'm really well, they have implied asking when I am going to get a work. I work more than full time as a writer. My word count, first 15 days of December as per what I published was 3774 per day, with a doldrum Dec. 11 to 15. I was down to 1883 per day those days (that's included in the 15 day average), and that's below Stephen King (2000) but still above Neil Gaiman (1500), and their word counts are pre-publication, much of those words are then scrapped.

When people who see I'm homeless are so eager to see if I establish common humanity with other homeless, it kind of suggests some of them are less eager to establish themselves a common humanity with me being homeless. While I do share a problem with the homeless, I do not share a solution with them, except that of dying in the streets, because every solution one envisages is blocked. For some of the others it's having a good social assistant. For some of the others it's going through a specific night shelter that could work as a halfway house. For me it's getting a publishing house, and the most realistic option is a) not a big one, perhaps not even a small Catholic one, b) not one I start myself, as homelessness is not ideal for stocking books and Amazon publishing is not reliable (betrayed Pope Michael I big time, with his republication of 9 condemnations by Popes of Heliocentrism), but instead c) one that some person not yet having started his carreer (or possibly having done so but having time and money for an extra carreer) starts, and perhaps in reference to my own production.

Sir, we two do have things in common beyond our common humanity. As in both being Catholics, both counting Pius XI as a clear successor of Peter, both being internet content providers. Plus, some periods when you have had children as yet small, you have probably been as overworked as the neighbourhood is keeping me since Maundy Thursday last year. Moving away is not a clear option, as I have a place to stock my thing which makes it easier to access internet in libraries and cybers. To some people, part of whom may be nominal Catholics, but who are as alien to the spirit of Christmas as the psychiatrist Taleb (Abdelmohsen, I think) who drove over people at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, that in itself is a disreputable excess and a reason to harrass me. Some of them may have reproached me over my internet acquaintances for not doing small talk. And some others may have tried to pair me off with another immigrant (but not the same country) who is also homeless (so, if we were a couple neither of us could avoid him or herself and the other to "seek assistance" as the phrase goes) and who is my age (and therefore infertile, fertility spans being different for men and women, on top of having difficulties in acquiring fluency in a language I speak). I think some parishioners have encouraged her, which they shouldn't have. God bless her, but not by my side, but God curse the men who have tried to find me every solution except the ones I want, and who on top of that assume I don't speak French (I do miss words and half phrases when they speak rapidly) and who on top of that assume that non-French in Parisian immigrants is one language (as long as it isn't Arabic, Berber or Peul). It isn't.

[Tried to add following and found the comment above was quickly deleted]

I said Maundy Thursday last year, by now it's actually the year before last ... Maundy Thursday 2023, before my mother died.

On New Year's Day, or Circumcision of God

The Gifts Of Grace Bestowed Upon Mary | Fr Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange
Return To Tradition | 1 Jan. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hJcoO3STjE

Happy New Year!

---

1:19 I thought you said Dom Guéranger, no, Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange, my bad, haven't read him, will listen

13:22 What I have stated about the good surprise that She had when visiting St. Elisabeth amounts to:
a) She suspended final judgement about being the Mother of God and of the Saviour until an earthly ecclesiastic authority confirmed it, basically like She told Bernadette to do;
b) She did not know or had at least suspended final judgement about Her being sinless, until Elisabeth explained the words of the angel with a clearer reference to Genesis 3:15.

Total defeater of Satan = totally sinless.

And if you ask me, She was happier about this even than about being the Mother of God. This is confirmed by Her divine Son's words "nay rather" which amount to saying: "give my mother the compliment she really savours" and also is how She raised Her Son. He was, humanly, happier about pleasing the Father than about being the Son.

What exactly do I mean?

"blessed among women" = total and mortally so defeater of someone (Jael and Judith, you just said She knew Scripture very well, which is true)
"and blessed is the fruit of thy womb" = woman and son = Genesis 3:15, it was the snake's head She had already crushed.

Unlike the Witch-King of Angmar, Satan can't be defeated by swords, so the one total defeat he could suffer from a human person was that someone being sinless.

And She knew also it was not just Her divine Son's sinlessness, since She had been told this by the angel before She was pregnant. Confer what the angel tells Her the following verses, "thou shalt conceive" ...

I don't understand what the Protestants are doing, those who claim to believe the Bible and refuse to believe the total sinlessness, hence the Immaculate Conception.

Will Fr. Tamayo Rodríguez accept Pope Michael II?

Now, Anthony Stine's reporting may be inaccurate, when he basically says that Fr. José Pablo de Jesús Tamayo Rodríguez lives off a pension and will now loose it. As the diocese expressly told faithful not to attend his Masses, this means that he's arguably making a living as active priest, even at age 81.

Bishop Brags About Kicking Elderly Priest To The Curb
Return To Tradition | 24 Dec. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jm1jz6KTac

I disagree on one thing.

You state that a heretic non-pope can only be declared so by a member of Ecclesia docens, perhaps calling an imperfect council. I don't think this has ever been defined. The idea "prima sedes a nemine judicatur" cuts both ways. Either someone is Pope and is not judged even by an Imperfect Council. Or he isn't, and even a layman can judge him as being such.

Hence, I believe the laymen who convened in Kansas in 1990 (I think in Belvue) were in their rights (I obviously do not think Wojtyla was radically better than Bergoglio).

The question I have for you: do 7:41 you believe that if Cardinal Burke were 7:44 to convene an imperfect council with... — and 7:45 had Cardinal Mueller's support and had 7:48 whatever other Cardinals you want to 7:50 name, including maybe even some hostile 7:52 to the question, but who agreed to 7:53 participate, what do you think would 7:54 happen to them? What would Rome's 7:57 response be?

8:02 What Rome's response would be would not determine what would happen to them.

9:42 "would be excommunicated"

Only if Bergoglio has valid authority to wield excommunication. Which would be precisely what they would not be granting, precisely what Fr. José Pablo de Jesús Tamayo Rodríguez is not granting.

Whether he does or not, he's a blogger, obviously in the noble language of Castilia and of Costa Rica:

Opus Cordis Eucharistici, O. C. E.
https://opuscordis.blogspot.com/

And Some Would Like to Intimidate Me About Seeking Justice in Court ...

Formerly Catholic Country Forces Monks To Accept A LadyMonk In Monastery*
Return To Tradition | 13 Nov. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-osFM2i9Cs

If after St. Nicolas du Chardonnet and Novus Ordo parishes have done what they could to isolate me as a writer, to get me mocked as a mental case, ranging from "scrupulosity" to "schizophrenia", I get a chance of suing them, I will NOT consider I'm on the wrong side.

THEY are on the wrong side for listening to shrinks and to carnal prudence about what associations are good and bad carreere moves for their young people.

THEY are on the wrong side for pretending to listen to my person, but systematically failing to listen to my project or to the truth I serve.

There were Church Fathers who did say Earth was not created in six literal days, every single one of them still accepted the chronologies of Genesis 5 and 11 as literally correct timelines between Adam and Abraham, between the very first man and a pharao of Egypt that Abraham met. This should be a no-brainer. But some would pretend there is science against this. Well, as it happens, I offer solution to more than one of the scientific difficulties for young earth, among others (my flagship so to speak) a young earth creationist calibration for C14 (from Flood to Fall of Troy).

These parishes want noone to even look up my solutions, and noone to get past their equivocation like "look, St. Augustine wasn't a six-days creationist" or even lies like "St. Augustine wasn't a young earth creationist" ... they have opted for exposing me to a kind of low key but still tangible at least approximation of psychiatric slavery, and I think that is not too much better than someone who was abused years ago in the McCarrick fashion.

Note:

* According to the actual news, this title is clickbait.

Pontificia, Real y Venerable Esclavitud del Santísimo Cristo de La Laguna is not a monastery, but "es una hermandad religiosa encargada de la imagen del Santísimo Cristo de La Laguna, que es la advocación de Cristo más venerada de Canarias,1 y una de las imágenes más antiguas del archipiélago."

And what is a "hermandad religiosa" or also known as a Cofradía? I switch to English and see : "A confraternity (Spanish: cofradía; Portuguese: confraria) is generally a Christian voluntary association of laypeople created for the purpose of promoting special works of Christian charity or piety, and approved by the Church hierarchy."

Of what? Of laypeople.

Next day:

Did you still not correct the fake news you made?

The confraternity is a confraternity, not a monastery. Now, the venerated image is situated in the Church of a convent.

Normally, given the veneration for the image, the Church where it is would not be in the "clausura" itself.

But the application was for membership in a lay confraternity that visits the image to venerate it. Given the 2021 verdict, it is basically certain that the image and the Church are outside the parts reserved to the conventual brothers.

Given that a lay fraternity is not living like monastics, the parallel would be if a lady were to apply to Knights of Columbus and the US Supreme Court ruled the application could not be refused.

Now, I know that the Knights of Columbus have one duty very much more men-reserved, traditionally, than venerating an image. To physically protect Catholic priests. But a female police officer or life guard with good training in martial arts would qualify.

What you are doing is kind of taking a "class room coeducation" news (very old news including after puberty in most countries, including Spain) and describing it like a "locker room" story.

Loisy and Mangenot

Loisy and Mangenot · Zen and Lofton

The Jesuit Origins Of Modernism | Michael Davies
Return To Tradition | 19 Oct. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhbOwa14sOw

16:27 Between Alfred Loisy and Karl Rahner, wasn't there a certain Teilhard?

And, somewhat more sober and discrete, but still not quite into Biblical truth, namely: "E . MANGENOT, professeur d'Écriture Sainte à l'institut catholique de Paris, consulteur de la commission biblique, L'authenticité mosaïque du Pentateuque"

He introduced the Framework theory on the Creation Days to replace what he admitted to be the three thitherto held theories:

• Young Earth Creationism (which he admitted to be the sole one before 1830, before Lyell)
• Day-Age (the theory of Fulcran Vigouroux, the one he had (on behalf of the Pope) judged licit to discuss among exegetes
• Gap Theory (the theory of Cardinal Wiseman).

In other words, like Theilhard, though less radical, he opposed the Fundamentalist solid past of the Catholic Church.

Probably, instead of firing Loisy, one should have closed down all of the institute after it had hired him, rather than allowing Mangenot to continue parts of his work.

Anthony Stine Has a Point About Poland. Someone Hasn't About Me.

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Anthony Stine Has a Point About Poland. Someone Hasn't About Me. · New blog on the kid: Russia Still Aborting Worse than the United States ?

Be Ready: Satan Is Coming For Poland
Return To Tradition | 9 Sept. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QE0nQ6qqAA

[Below has been censored too, I checked, all comments chronological order, mine two were no longer visible.]

3:03 So far, Poland has been more moral than Russia, thanks to the ban.

I don't think Lech Kaczyński would have been willing to take that crap, but he died in 2010 under somewhat suspicious circumstances.

[later on]

"It is necessary to underline that the development of such medical guidelines ..."

They are NOT purely medical, but about the ethical limits on medical interventions.

"... should be left to scientific societies."

Not the least.

If Cryonics had happened to get wide support among doctors, obviously the scientific societies would abolish laws forbidden people to deepe freeze themselves before they die.

When scientists in the US, in Sweden, in Germany, thought the human race or national part thereof could be improved by preventing some from reproducing, the absolutely worst thing that any government did (and one that AH did) was to greenlight these guys.

In Germany you also had doctors saying some people are better off dead, and yes, AH greenlighted those scientists too.

Scientists are among the least fit to debate about the ethical limits that should be put to science or scientific practises.

It's a somewhat different case when it comes to saying "sorry, the cancer is still spreading after three chemotherapies, we cannot save your life anyway, so, try to live your last months as well as you can" ...

Chemotherapy is a pretty invasive treatment, not always successful in saving lives, and denying it in some circumstances cannot be seen as any kind of equivalent to murder.

Trads Imitate Modernists?

I cannot swear that the censorship of my comments under youtube are the fact of certain channels, by now that would include "Return To Tradition" if so.

But I can mention, what is happening reminds eerily, not of what Pope St. Pius X recommended, but of what he denounced:

Modernists Must Be SILENCED | Pope St Pius X Return To Tradition | 7 Sept. 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqK6oTby_zw 0:57 I look up Pascendi. The letters "silen" (whether -t or -ce) occur three times, and "Modernists must be silenced" is not one of those times. The third is actually about Modernists trying to silence Catholics: "When an adversary rises up against them with an erudition and force that render him redoubtable, they try to make a conspiracy of silence around him to nullify the effects of his attack," [This was taken down before I could add] There is in fact a paragraph that does speak of censorship. §§ 52 and 53 are dedicated to the topic. However, not in the mode of "conspiracy of silence" but in the mode "refuse the nihil obstat" and "withdraw a priest's permission to act as newspaper editor" in both cases obviously "if" the writer or priest-editor should be promoting Modernist content.

PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS X ON THE DOCTRINES OF THE MODERNISTS
https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-x_enc_19070908_pascendi-dominici-gregis.html

So, the words of Anthony Stine are:

0:39 — 1:13

while voices of Orthodoxy are the ones who are in fact the ones getting censored we got to a place like this because prescriptions that were given by Pope St Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis as document outlining the heresy of the modernists and how to combat them were never actually implemented the full of them in Vigor they should have been and today we're going to get to that uncomfortable topic of censorship Pius X explicitly said that those who promote modernism should be censored

Well, yes. He did say in §§ 50 and 51 that bishops should condemn publications that were already in circulation, whether as books or as periodicals, with some different measures. Obviously a blog is closer to a periodical than to a book, so, the measures that could most apply are those meant for periodicals.

He also did say in §§ 52 and 53 that bishops should prevent books and periodicals from being published with for instance printing presses of the see or with priests as editors. Unless, of course, they were orthodox. He wasn't saying the reprint of the Penny Catechism couldn't happen from Episcopal printing presses. He was not saying that Father Maximilian Kolbe should have been forbidden to continue as editor of Rycerz Niepokalanej. If anything, it is more like the archdiocese of Paris was culpably neglecting its duties when permitting that, in a work of reference even, the Framework Theory should be proposed in 1920, or now allowing Sébastien Antoni, presumed Assumptionist, to continue journalism after denying the existence of Adam and Eve as individual persons rather than, on his view, just symbols.

So, while he said to prevent reading and printing, he also said by what means to do so. Traditional means of authority. Committees of vigilance are certainly pushed ... but only to help the bishops do the job of condemning books already published or not give approvals to books with such and such contents. They are not authorised to take up the weapon of the modernists, namely "conspiracy of silence" ... which is what has been done about me, it would seem./HGL

PS, it seems he returned to the subject. I didn't watch the video, since the title "councils of vigilance" obviously refers to the content of the encyclical, I commented very briefly as to the title:

The Need For Councils Of Vigilance To Defend Against Modernism | Pope St Pius X
Return To Tradition | 21.IX.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNvV5Fg5uQg

Councils of Vigilance as described in Pascendi had as task to get bishops to:

• withhold nihil obstat and imprimi postest / imprimatur
• publically ban the reading of books nevertheless published.

They did not have as object to implement conspiracies of silence against someone considered heterodox, St. Pius X did not say it was licit to mirror the tactics of modernists in this regard.

[tried to add]

Still less were they authorised to substitute themselves for the judgement of bishops.

He asked why women religious are more often the target

A good video, with one reservation:

Rome Forces Traditional Nuns To Get Indoctrinated To Prove Their Loyalty
Return To Tradition | 19.VIII.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocGppTWi91E

[It features one "Father Navarro" meaning Martin Navarro.]

First my answer to the question, then my reservation:

Perhaps those guys are collaborating with Psychiatry.

I took at look at male female ratio, and the first paper that came up was from Red China.

That's where the link to the Communist roots of this evil are most obvious.

The study was probably not sampled based on gender, so the gender outcome would be significant.

80 thousand 356 or 37.22 % were male.
135 thousand 552 or 62.78 % were female.

19 % were ages 0 to 18.

Now, the problem is, can you guess the most prevalent diagnose?

79 thousand 521 patients or 36.83 % were Anxiety disorders.

Do you see a possible link? I do.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450837/

24:53 Pope Michael II would argue that the FSSPX are schismatic for adhering to Antipope Bergoglio. AND feeling free to disobey the man they (pretend to) consider Pope.

Edward Pleń (Sharing a Story)

New blog on the kid: Sacré-Cœur Was Shining, When Paris Was Dark? · God's or Man's Anger? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Edward Pleń (Sharing a Story)

The Mass Was BANNED: The Olympics Story Keeps Getting WORSE
Return To Tradition | 16.VIII.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azHtjvGiKYc