Showing posts with label Statman_. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Statman_. Show all posts

Sunday, June 2, 2013

...on ghosts and miracles

Retrieved from:http://www.webcitation.org/5cRZYhmUC
Re: Intelligent Design10/16/03 (ten years ago, in some months) 09:16 pm
by: hglundahl (34/M/Malmö)Msg: 200455 of 200980
dhux99
Conservative Christianity posits assumptions not supported by evidence and in contradiction to both evidence and reason, such as
HGL
note examples:
dhux99
the existence of a pit in which almost everyone is tortured,
HGL
- contradicted by noone's experience or right reason, confirmed frequently by ghosts from hell who have complained and warned

[I forgot to correct "almost everyone" to "a majority, facing an important minority who go to Heaven"]
dhux99
a virgin bi[r]th particular to Jesus,
HGL
- contradicted by noone's experience or right reason, but confirmed by the people concerned
dhux99
and a world created in six days with the sun, moon, and stars made after the earth, et cetera.
HGL
- contradicted by noone's experience or right reason

all of which also confirmed by the authority of scriptures accepted by the Church founded by Christ as inspired by God
napolleon_wang said something about ghosts and I replied twice:
Sir: Holy writ tells us of at least one ghost: Samuel's appearing to king Saul.

St Gregory the great tells us of rather many ghosts, both from Hell and from Purgatory, the ones warning us not to share their fate, the others begging for intercession.

The people who make fun of ghosts are enemies of the Catholic Church and of Christ.

who said i am scared of ghosts?

i said i believe there are such, that is another thing
I also had to reply to one Statman_
HGL
as to your q 1, look at what this comic attitude to ghosts is doing with people's reactions to a Catholic:

note examples:
dhux99
the existence of a pit in which almost everyone is tortured,
HGL
- contradicted by noone's experience or right reason, confirmed frequently by ghosts from hell who have complained and warned
Statman_
Get thee to a psychiatrist, most quick.
HGL
if you want to get people who believe in the human testimony confirming ghosts into those places, you are a persecutor.
Statman_
Get thee to a psychiatrist, then, who treats paranoid states. Christianity encourages paranoid states.
HGL
other reaction:
I had said:
The people who make fun of ghosts are enemies of the Catholic Church and of Christ.
napolleon_wang
ha ha ha doffus and pe:ople who bleleive in gosts are 4 year old and pleople with d[iaper on head

are you believving in eas;ter bunny doffus

NpawAng
HGL
Are you prepared to have Catholics publically insulted for stating their faith or part of it?
Further replies to Statman_ and napolleon_wang:
I responded to your question whether not agreeing with the Catholic Church makes you an enemy thereof. That was in turn a response to my claim that the people who not just disbelieve ghosts but actually make fun of people who believe there are ghosts are enemies of the Church. I was showing you what I meant by inimical.

there are six year olds who do not believe in ghosts, because they have been told there are no ghosts. when i was six i believed in evolution and when i was eight i believed in heliocentrism as well.

comparing someone to small children or madmen because they believe in ghosts is clearly insulting and humiliating.
resumé of exchange with dhux:
HGL
Are you prepared to have Catholics publically insulted for stating their faith or part of it?
dhux99
No laws were broken.
HGL
If the laws of your country allow you to recommend a man going to a shrink for believing there are ghosts, or calling the same man paranoid, or a fellow of you to compare such a man to someone wearing diapers on his head, your country or state has no laws.
dhux99
I can see you have no appreciate for my comedy whatsoever. I believe authoritarian institutions and personalities are entirely fit subjects for comedy and satire and not for use as proof texts for establishing doctrine or rationalizing traditions.
HGL
So now a ghost or a person who has seen one or a person who believes another person or persons who has seen them are all of a sudden the mighty and powerful in this society? That IS indeed a comic implication. LOL!
dhux99
What planet do you come from?
HGL
I am from Vienna which is not on any planet but on this earth. And as far as I know, as early as when Oscar Wilde wrote The Ghost of Canterville in the 19th C, one prerequisite for being as high and mighty as for instance a US Ambassador was disbelieving in ghosts. I do not think you live in another world where believing in ghosts the Catholic way is seen as a merit for any carreer of power: at least not among English and USAmericans.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

...on religious persecution in Roman Empire

Re: Intelligent Design
by: hglundahl (34/M/Malmö) 10/17/03 08:37 am
Msg: 200481 of 200982

there are no remains of churches found anytime before the 4th century.


there are of catacombs though - were the Church gathered before they could appear publicly in basilicas.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 200459 by Parkers_Dog

objections of Statamn can be inferred from my replies:

Re: Intelligent Design
by: hglundahl (34/M/Malmö) 10/17/03 07:36 pm
Msg: 200536 of 200982

are you illiterate?

or are you unaware that emperor Trajan ordered execution of Christians reported as such and persistently refusing to sacrifice to emperor?

or that marcaurelius, known in other respects as a philosopher was one of the persecutors?

Posted as a reply to: Msg 200517 by Statman_

objections of Statman can be inferred from my replies:

Re: Intelligent Design
by: hglundahl (34/M/Malmö) 10/18/03 11:00 am
Msg: 200592 of 200982

I named two of the emperors generally known to be benign to their non-christian subjects. I named two fairly early ones to illustrate antichristian legislation as "valid" under later ones.

My point, unless you are retarded should be obvious: if Marc Aurelius and Trajan were prepared to throw any Christian reported to the beasts, what would you expect from generally cruel ones like Nero and Domitian or Decius and Maximian Daja, not to mention if a law-abiding emperor so early was prepared to treat Christians like a sort of traitors (according to the hysteric and hateful assessment of Celsus) what do you expect from later law-abiding ones falling back on their laws, like Diocletian?

Another point of making same illustration is that of 260 popes, c 100 reigned between Nero and Constantine, and there were no papal abdications.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 200543 by Statman_

Update

Roman Law is in fact a very Christian thing. Codex Iuris Civilis is by Emperor Justinian, and was unknown to Nero and Domitian up to Diocletian and Maximianus Daja.

It was written on a codex, that is a book as the books we have. Nero only had scrolls. The codex books on vellum, eventually with Uncial and lower case letters are a Christian invention, and predate the famous Roman Law.