Identifying False Prophets and Mystics Videogram
American Institute of Health Care Professionals | 13 Aug. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_WNCfuY3dA
Would you mind telling me, if American Christian Health Care Professionals have me on a watchlist on this kind of suspicion?
I claim that young earth creationism and geocentrism hold true. That "John Paul II" to at least "Francis" are probably not true Popes. That we probably live in the end times, that part of what Trump is doing (to immigrants) or planning to do (to homeless) is Antichristian, that he is not the Beast, as his gematria is not 666 in any version of his name I can spell so far, that a candidate on that account would be Putin, that earthly Jerusalem is already spiritually Sodom and Egypt, that Enoch and Elijah have not already come, but will. Oh, in the context of YEC, that Babel was (Genesis 10 and 11) in Göbekli Tepe (or perhaps Karahan Tepe) and that the tower describes a rocket project, where a take-off would have failed, while God's decision to confuse the languages gave Wernher von Braun a chance. Nearly everyone on earth had already forgotten Nimrod, and the few Hebrews who hadn't (later the many Catholics who haven't) were thinking in terms of a skyscraper.
Now, what I do most certainly NOT claim is being a mystic, or getting these informations from God or the Blessed Virgin or other saints, except by the means of Providence, just as Providence made me come across the info that Albigensians really were not Christians (Umberto Eco, Name of the Rose, never saw the film, got the book at age 16 as Christmas present and on New Year had decided to convert.
The kind of discernment you propose, the kind of watchfulness against abuse that you propose, is so easy to abuse, and is very probably by some being abused. I could have had my work in print 2009 if it hadn't been for this sort of thing, and instead I'm still impoverished and homeless despite 13 000 + blog posts, a lot of which are essays that could immediately be put into print commercially, and another lot of which are dialogues that could be put into print as soon as you get a clearing from other participants.
If I'm not off the street, it's not because I'm waiting for God to give me a sign to start earning money instead of writing, I'm waiting for guys, probably like you, to allow my writing to be a gainful work, as it was for Chesterton, as it is for Trent Horn or Jimmy Akin.
If you find the positions I enumerated so absurd, you don't even look for a possible rational argument about them, you just find them a symptom classifiable as delusion, I consider you a representative of the Scarlet Beast. If a Catholic clergyman bows down to your assessment or caution, should such a thing be the case, or that of someone like you, instead of asking himself whether what I said was heresy or could on a Catholic dogmatic view be correct, then his bowing down to you makes him part of the Harlot. Clergy should have Christ, not Communism, as the Bridegroom of His Church. And what you would in such a case be doing would be Communism, not Medicine. My mother was a Med. cand. and Intern, I know the difference between what she did, and what certain colleagues did to her, by a professional or personal interest in Psychiatry.
You pretend to be health professionals? Then the question of false prophets and false mystics isn't your concern. You are not bishops or theologians.
5:43 As I'm homeless, some could pretend I had sacrificed my life for some false mystic, or for a false experience on my own part.
I have not sacrificed my life, I am prevented from getting the life I want. By evil-doers, as far as I could tell.
6:14 "they're out miracle shopping"
Whether or not someone should hope for a miracle, is ultimately a concern between him and God. In some cases his superiors or pastors.
What a med professional terms "mature" or "immature" faith is totally beside the point. I don't think there is any part of any Church document (prior to Vatican II) that even uses the words. "Unstable" in II Peter is not synonym with "immature".
A Commie would obviously consider any hope for obtaining a miracle, and any unhesitant affirmation such and such a thing is a real miracle, is "immature faith" as long as he wasn't able to apply the kind of measures Albania did under Enver Hoxha.
6:34 A verification for the faith is not limited to wanting to see with ones own eyes, good Apologetics is not the doubt of Thomas.
By the way, I'm offering Apologetics. I'm not that needy myself, even if those who hate my Apologetics would love if it were the case.
7:04 A Fundamentalist type of understanding of the faith is what we should have.
If a certain guy in the Vatican isn't Fundamentalist, he arguably isn't the Pope (that includes the former Antipope Ratzinger), and shouldn't be listened to, since in a layman, he could be a Catholic ill instructed, but in the position of a bishop needs to be shunned as preaching heresy.
7:13 I'm certainly a victim of trauma and abuse ... by the likes of you.
Doesn't make me easier to manipulate.
If you pretend I'm manipulated, you are basically abusing mental health jargon to censor me, to pretend a non-extant protection and impose further abuse.
8:13 As Christians, you should leave the discernment to bishops and theologians, they shouldn't outsource it to your psychological assessments.
And bishops and theologians should not embark on this kind of discernment if no actual CLAIM to prophecy or mysticism is being made. They should ask the person concerned, and not outsource it to your psychological assessments.
Again, my positions are (apart those held by all Catholics, which are many more), these:
I claim that young earth creationism and geocentrism hold true. That "John Paul II" to at least "Francis" are probably not true Popes. That we probably live in the end times, that part of what Trump is doing (to immigrants) or planning to do (to homeless) is Antichristian, that he is not the Beast, as his gematria is not 666 in any version of his name I can spell so far, that a candidate on that account would be Putin, that earthly Jerusalem is already spiritually Sodom and Egypt, that Enoch and Elijah have not already come, but will. Oh, in the context of YEC, that Babel was (Genesis 10 and 11) in Göbekli Tepe (or perhaps Karahan Tepe) and that the tower describes a rocket project, where a take-off would have failed, while God's decision to confuse the languages gave Wernher von Braun a chance. Nearly everyone on earth had already forgotten Nimrod, and the few Hebrews who hadn't (later the many Catholics who haven't) were thinking in terms of a skyscraper.
I'd take a debate with anyone on these matters, provided he were the type of guy interested in debate, and I would not invoke my own experience as decisive argument. I would invoke the difference between "observation" and "conclusion", or the ASCII value of upper case A as 65, equally that Göbekli Tepe is West of the Mountains of Armenia, that a rocket before take off looks like a three storied tower, whereof only the top storey will reach into space (earlier referred to as heaven). I would appeal to an atmosphere in 2556 BC of 51 percent modern Carbon equally resulting in a carbon age of 10 000 years ago, as an atmosphere in 8000 BC with 100 pmC. On both theories, the sample would in 2556 BC have c. 51 pmC. None of these arguments are God speaking to me. None of this is based of me being a prophet or mystic.
8:35 The apparitions of Fatima were investigated exactly like what you refer to.
Chesterton mentioning that the respect for children is the fruit of Catholicism, not Paganism, or "Peter Pan belongs to the world of Peter, not to the world of Pan" was NOT investigated the manner you refer to.
Bernadette Soubirous was investigated as you mention. There was a medical involvement, but had nothing to do with "delusion" or "fundamentalism" or whatnot, the doctor took her pulse, so the trance was not induced by an anxious or otherwise very vivid physical passion.
Tolkien mentioning Henry VIII's divorce or impiety against the Welsh his ancestors spoke was NOT investigated such manners.
Now, the operative distinction is not between "banale" or "paradoxic" (Chesterton was regarded as paradoxic). The operative distinction is simply between receiving a message as someone seeing the Virgin Mary physically appear, and concluding for a truth out of own research. Each one of my positions falls on the latter side.
9:28 The questions "are they mad" (question in the case of Bernadette Soubirous, concluding negatively as the pulse was calm during her vision) and "do they have mental issues" (which could include any kind of "attitude problem" as per DSM-V) are not synonymous.
I'm on a daily basis abused by people wanting to "verify" if I'm of a sound mind. When Muslim children passing are curious whether I ate chicken, or when a black stranger asks me "how are you" in a way too reminiscent of "are you really well?" and I get visibly angry, they can go to some mental health professional and pretend I get angry for nothing. I don't think it's for nothing. It's respect for my personal liberties, for not allowing strangers to one-sidedly introduce themselves into my life as "friends" just because I'm on the street, and especially when it's highly probable they are doing some dirty work for actually mental health professionals who are power greedy people, as was seen in the Khruschev era (with which psychiatrists of the West had "scientific" collaboration).
10:02 "especially with all these mystics and false prophets that have doomsday calendars"
Does this mean, my claims on Apocalypse 11 state of the Knesset and Apocalypse 13 gematria will continue to be investigated until Armageddon, and be used as leverage to keep all the rest under a shrug by "it's being looked into" along with it?
Will it stop when Henoch and Elijah come and do miracles? Some of them obviously highly punitive.
Or are some people in your version of the Catholic Church (too respectful of the likes of you for my taste) finally getting around to the fact that mental health professionals and exorcists are less of clue than actually challenging me on the doctrinal level?
10:56 "it's important ... so you don't become a victim"
I'm an ex-Lutheran. One thing Luther said, in a very different context, was, if you find you have been fooled by someone, good for you. Nice lesson of humility for your judgement. He compares the guy in this position to a man fallen into a ditch adding "and here he lieth all for the better" ... he should enjoy the spectacle of his having been misled as a kind of slapstick comedy.
Luther didn't claim it was important never to become a victim to the neighbour ... in general. As to religious doctrine, he was far more ultra-magisterial than Catholicism is, and so Lutherans and Anglicans are to this day.
But the very phrase pair "it's important ... so you don't become a victim" is a very modern American phrase. The goal is not always within our power. The means to an impossible goal should not be extreme. Precisely as Nimrod had no right to draft mankind into a rocket project the Neolithic was not technologically mature for, and as Fauci or in France Salomon had no business drafting society into mask- or vaccine mandates. Or at least partially, Putin in Russia. The means chosen were extreme, the bad outcome one tried to escape was hysterically overemphasised (people weren't dying galore when the Black Sea flooded some decade or century before Babel, and mankind would not have been reduced to a rubble of skeleta reminiscent of Gaza without masks and vaccines), the good outcome (saving mankind from Flood-able Earth, eradicating Covid) was not attainable, therefore the "one world totalitarian" measures were not justified.
Tried to add:
I suppose, when I write, when I hold cardboards with URLs to my blogs, there are some US Americans around who here are telling people to either give me nothing at all, or give me only food, and above all not read my blogs, but pretend interest, hand the URL over to someone like you in France who hands it over to someone like you in US or Brazil. Because, of course, otherwise they might risk taking me seriously as a writer, believing I'm a writer because I said so, and "it's important they don't do that so they don't become victims"
Meanwhile, same day, or rather next day, but time zone of Australia, so still "same day" in France, as by "pure coincidence" Creation Ministries International, who are as unlikely to relish my Catholicism, as a Catholic on "American Institute of Health Care Professionals" to relish my Young Earth Creationism, came out with ‘Flat Earthism’ and seeking truth in a confused world. Those guys love to appeal to the Galileo case in a Heliocentric perspective, so are biassed against Geocentrism. Look out for them systematically mentioning Flat Earthism but not Geocentrism apart from Flat Earthism. Andrew Sibley writes:
Such writers argue that heliocentrism is false. That is, the correct view of the Sun at the centre of the Solar System (orbited by all the planets) was allegedly developed by people interested in promoting Paganism (i.e. sun worship), so that’s why they rejected the geocentric view.
Paganism is not just sun worship. It's also post-truth or radical scepticism. When Seneca (quoted by Sungenis, also not a Flat Earthist) is neutral on "whether a god turns the heavens around earth, or earth within the heavens" — that's a jab at sensory data being reliable truth. From Ficino to Kant, from Neo-Platonism to Idealism, there is a thrust to rely on pure thought against the senses. Geocentrism which adapts the thinking to actual sense data doesn't fit that.
But this is false. They ignore the fact that Geo, or Gaia was also an ancient Greek god, so the argument doesn’t hold. Furthermore, one of the main proponents of the modern flat Earth view, Eric Dubay, describes himself as a Hindu Yogi—and he is President of the International Flat Earth Research Society!4 ‘Flat Earthism’ certainly fits with Hindu mythology, where the Earth is said to rest on four elephants, themselves standing on a turtle.
Correct, but this is no valid indictment of Sungenis, myself, Gerardus Dingeman Bouw or the late Pope Michael I.
No comments:
Post a Comment