co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Thursday, March 12, 2026
Miracles Chapter III, from Another POV
First third of a video by Mr. Zod against CSL as Apologist · Same Video on CSL as Apologist, Roughly Up to Rest of First Half · Coming to Lunatic, Liar or Lord in the End ... and Breaking Off, as Comments Get Invisible · Lunatic, Liar or Lord ... Resuming · Miracles Chapter III, from Another POV
An 1800 BC Babylonian Clay Tablet Solved What Took Google 30 Years..
Spacialize | 11 March 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhv6HYElfyY
"Maybe they are a record of what this universe requires"
Logic and morals seem to fill that criterium too.
If we evolved from Ramapithecus, which couldn't talk, where did we get that from?
The only possible answer is a transtemporal or non-temporal reality that had logic, morals, and presumably "regular numbers" since forever, there was no time when it didn't have it.
But that transtemporal or non-temporal reality is not man as we know.
The question brings us to concepts of God.
Pantheism, Dualism, these are less coherent than Theism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment