co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Friday, April 10, 2026
Dogs and Beer and a Bad Religion
The Queer Origins of Muslim Hate for Dogs: A Prophet, a Gay Lover, and a Puppy
Raymond Ibrahim | 14 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXCYh7TcKUw
Is there a similar story behind the animus against alcohol?
I mean, some tend to (unconsciously or perhaps not) keep a man who's taking alms in consuming non-alcoholic things known to be bad for gout, and then use the gout as proof of alcohol abuse and as an incitation to abstinence.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment