And Pope Michael II doesn't deny the need to be in union with the Pope, as per Unam Sanctam. And if you say a Pope needs to have his residence in Rome, take that up with Pope Benedict XII.
Are SSPX Priests No Longer Catholic?
Catholic Answers Live Clips | 8 Febr. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snL_0GziY_s
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @hglundahl
- Sedevacantist and SSPX, you are forgetting the third category, Orthopapist.
Part of them mysticalist (St. Jovit in Canada being one and Palmar de Troya outside Seville in Spain another headquarter of ... Popes chosen or with predecessors chosen by whoever revealed himselves or themselves to these men).
Part are conclavist. The theological position is, sedevacancy leads, as usual, to a right and duty to elect a new Pope. The unusual thing being cardinals siding with a wrongful Pope, so one has to do without cardinals.
Pius XIII is out, without successor, since he died.
Linus II is out, he withdrew.
Remains, the first one and his successor, Popes Michael I and II.
- Copecanada
- @chrismah6248
- The same ones who thought to correct and rewrite the Bible? Who had a "pontiff" see the errors and leave their church?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @chrismah6248 I think you are confusing Palmarian with Conclavist.
Or perhaps you only saw top of my comment, the sentence "some of them are Mysticalists" which include Palmarians. Michael I and II have 1) not rewritten the Bible, and 2) not had any known defectors. Prove Michael I didn't die but arranged his death is about when you could speak of a defector.
- Copecanada
- @hglundahl I probably am mixing the two up
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @chrismah6248 Yes, look up the other guys, there is an interview on Chris Wagner's channel Scholastic Answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment