co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Monday, January 5, 2026
A Muslim Perhaps Made a Mistake in Quoting St. Thomas Aquinas via a Modern Work, the Summa is However Available (in Translation)
Here is a video involving how he got corrected:
@DailyPursuitOfTruth
He Tried to Misquote Aquinas… Then Got Exposed
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AOEMx53rFRc
Here is the work he was reading from:
Gregory M. Reichberg, Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace, 2017
https://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Aquinas-Peace-Gregory-Reichberg/dp/1107019907
I'm not sure if Gregory M. Reichberg makes the mistake or not.
Here is the Summa in English translation:
Summa Theologiae
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/
Here is the article that is being quoted from:
II—II: Question 10. Unbelief in general
Article 8. Whether unbelievers ought to be compelled to the faith?
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3010.htm#article8
Looking up Reichberg, it is probable that the Muslim misread him or oversimplified.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment