co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, July 18, 2026
Robert Sarah is Wrong
What are the Two Apocalyptic Beasts Devouring Europe?
17.VII.2026 | Dr Taylor Marshall
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qrciVBhhfk8
Why do I think "Cardinal" Sarah is wrong?
Because, Islam, and mainly adapted Islam (Fundies are a minority) is part of a four headed leopard, and Sarah is not adressing the three other heads.
Because gender ideology is part of Communism, which as a whole is the fourth beast of a terrible aspect.
In Africa, notably Nigeria, an openly Fundamentalist Islam is the most horrible thing for Christians, since it easily gets weapons.
In Europe, adapted Islam is more horrible, since it easily gets influence and positions from which to persecute some singled out Christians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment