co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Monday, November 10, 2025
Some Think I Have More in Common with This Man, I Think I have More in Common with That Lady
No, it's not about gender confusion.
I mean some think I should take homelessness like this man does:
I Asked a Homeless Man Why God Allows Suffering — His Answer Moved Me
CPR Missions | 5 Nov. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYKRrw6VCFM
For my part, I take "background discreditation" the way Megan Basham does:
Christian Publishers Tried to Stop This Book | Megan Basham
Eric Metaxas | 9 nov. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxCm6gEpIv8
Anyone who is asking me to ignore things about publishing, and just take homelessness like this man in a wheelchair, who for that reason cannot do physical work, and according to his accent wasn't trained for intellectual work the way I was, is, as far as I am concerned, my enemy. Just as pastor so and so was enemy to Megan Basham or remains so./HGL
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment