Debunking the Great Apostasy!
Catholic Answers Live Clips | 31 Oct. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2bh1y6c804
As you may note, this totally excludes that the great apostasy involves predecessors of St. Gregory I or some of his immediate successors.
It does not preclude that Dimond Brothers are right about "Leo XIV" since not only there are still Catholics not holding to Vatican II and all that but even clergy who claim continuity with the faith of Pius XII and rejection of Vatican II (and who have good claims, confirmed by Michael I before he died, to Apostolic Succession).
"anyone who would leave the Church and demonized her to justify their rebellion was the true definition of apostasy. If that isn't the Protestant REBELLION"
Speaking of which, loads of what's wrong with Vatican II is an exaggerated reach out to Protestants.
Case in point. My confirmation sponsor in 1990 had as his confirmation sponsor an old man who was somewhat of a mentor to me ... to a point. He was engaged in ecumenic dialogue with a Methodist "bishop" who was cramming him full with snydes about "we need to get rid of the accumulations, all the councils and definitions, and theologians and stuff, and go back just to the Bible" ...
Watching that work out, near his deathbed, was also the deathbed of my loyalty to the Dominicans of Lund, to the bishop of Stockholm, and the supposed Pope who made him such, supposedly (a real bishop of Stockholm being Johannes Erik Müller).
To make it clear, I think the Great Apostasy is in some sense incomplete.
I think Mother Miriam is a Catholic, if answering to the wrong Pope, but I also think some guys who deny individual existence of Adam and Eve are Apostates, and that the "authorities" allowing this are promoting Apostasy.
No comments:
Post a Comment