co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Sunday, December 7, 2025
What About the Oral Torah?
Did Moses REALLY Give Us an Oral Torah? Reacting to Rabbi Tovia Singer
Reason & Theology | 5 Dec. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbygRTQI6vM
6:40 The oral transmission could have been preserved but dismissed?*
7:26 We know it isn't, they rejected the true Christ and so the views on what the Torah commanded were reassessed accordingly, falsifying it.
If you want the correct oral Torah, you need to get it from Apostolic Tradition, not Rabbinic.
Sts. Paul and Timothy were repositories of the oral Torah before they became Christians and became the fulfilment of that by becoming Christians.
* Mr. Lofton refers to the loss of the book of the law, recovered by IV Kings 22, arguing, the oral tradition needs to have been lost too. I argue it could have been preserved and dismissed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment