co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Sunday, December 7, 2025
Thank You Very Much Mr. Lofton
@reasonandtheology
Did Pope Benedict XVI Believe the Magisterium Has Erred?*
Mailbag: What is the Age of Consent in Catholicism?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jV0R-eCFcE4
As to consent, 1917 also sees it as puberty, and also takes the biological medium age rounded to nearest whole year.
Yes, marriage is raised to 16 for a male, 14 for a female, BUT in order to contract infamy by law, in that specific category one could equate to "pedocriminal", the limit remains 14 /12.
As you may know, the people who reject "Vatican II" and its "popes", we still hold to 1917.
16 and 14 are when c. 95 % of males and females each have gone through puberty.
* Haven't seen the whole video this is a clip from, but if he did, that's a warning flag against taking him for having been Pope.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment