The Most Amusing Attack on Evolution I've Ever Seen
SciManDan | 28 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDVQkd8dp8w
5:33 What about genes and even combinations of different genes that cannot be explained by coming from small accumulating changes in other genes?
6:40 Rock layers are dated ...
They didn't use radiometric when starting the narrative, though.
1) Radiometric. Extra argon was trapped in the Flood which solidified lava quickly. Or, both potassium argon and uranium processes were sped up so that the mud after the Flood could dryp up more quickly. Mud problem and heat problem cancel out.
2) Consistent order. That depends on "rock layers" ... the thing is, shale comes in many different ones of those, as a material, and so does sandstone. The land fossils usually come in one layer and so the "period" fauna actually reflects the biogeography of the pre-Flood world. (The sea fossils come in different layers, as they were at different heights in the pre-Flood sea or sometimes where it inundated pre-Flood land).
7:04 and radiometric dating
The big bluff.
7:46 Indeed. In California la Baja it seems that the "late" Cretaceous land fauna was flooded by "early" Palaeocene marine fauna, not the least decapods.
8:11 You are basically grading "early" or "low" by your view of what was earliest in fauna, like Ediacaran only containing bacteria and similar.
9:27 I'd go with habitat for land fossils.
The assemblage zones of Karoo are side by side in the terrain. And that means that different habitats could be buried side by side, and give different "assemblage zones" (local subdivisions of for instance Permian or Triassic) simply by containing different fauna.
9:35 Mixing would not be apparent in land habitats, though.
Sure, a T Rex could be washed 500 km away, but if so would not appear today as a recognisable T Rex fossil. If a T Rex fossil looks like an assembled skeleton, presumably it was buried in situ.
9:40 Rabbits would be a land habitat, and trilobies a marine one.
9:43 Men would not have lived with dinosaurs in close quarters any more than we do now with Safari fauna.
10:05 Disagree with Hovind here. Sortings during the Flood, we would usually see just the top layer, or possibly some underneath that if the top layer was worn off later in the Flood.
10:45 Where they lived.
[SciManDan is presenting the fossils as sorted by when they lived, which between the interpretations is begging the question]
11:40 their position within rock layers around the world
Similar habitats result in similar layers. As similarity is defined by fossils contained.
11:52 often using radiometric dating where appropriate
Meaning, some radiometric dates exist, that contradict, like the radiocarbon ones collected by Armitage, but those dates are somehow inappropriate ...
No comments:
Post a Comment