Paul (un-) Ehrlich and "Paul VI"

I am not fully endorsing the position of the Dimond Brothers, as Popes Michael I and II uphold the judgement of Pope Pius XII against Fr. Leonard Feeney.

However, I am interacting, as even with Vatican II-ers, or SSPX-ers. Some of the questions must be ultimately left to the judgement of Pope Michael II.

My final comment was obviously meant to encourage them to submit to the real Pope, since his predecessor was elected by laymen./HGL

Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed - And Why He Was “Silenced”
vaticancatholic.com | 30 Oct. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjfrn1wwimY

I suppose you agree that St. Eustace went to Heaven, and needed to be Catholic to get there.

However, I suppose you also agree that Our Lord told him, that his alms had pleased Him.

Would you say that sanctifying grace can sometimes be given in advance of explicit faith, or would you attribute another meaning to the words?

Like through the alms given before grace, Our Lord Jesus Christ saw the alms he would later give in grace, or perhaps simply that the alms had pleased one of those already members of Christ, or even many of them, so that Christ was talking as in Matthew 25?

2:03 Would you agree that if there was something demonic in Salem (current Danvers, not the city of Salem), it came through a Calvinist pastor with a toxic need of power?

5:24 I have personally a few months before he died taken an interest in converting him.

He posted a video against the Real Presence, I refuted it. He posted a video with "appreciation" of Mary, but reservations against actual dogmas, I refuted it.

Now, there is a number of testimonies he was getting Catholic, and the night before he was killed, he consulted a Catholic exorcist.

This said, he did pray with Frank Turek minutes before the shot, but he could have mistaken the Vatican II Sect for Catholicism, and believed "the Catholic Church" that it was OK to pray with non-Catholics.

12:28 Did he say "a rational control of births by couples"?

Too close to another Paul, who could have been named Unehrlich, but was named Ehrlich by irony. Lucus a non lucendo or something.

12:28 bis. It could be mentioned, the main miracle attributed to "Paul VI" involved no sudden complete reversion to normal, but a pregnancy continued without amniotic liquid, which is abnormal.

Or that when 7DA pretend that "yes, Vicarius Filii Dei is an official title of the Pope" they can point to two bulls by this antipope. Their one example of a Medieval document by a Pope actually involves a phrase avoiding to limit the title to these words, making sure the total of Roman numerals is different. It's one where the Pope explains to a Khan why he's sending missionaries.

Or that "PAULUS PP" in ASCII adds up to "666" (he could have used PAVLVS or most letters in lower case, and instead of PP he could have used pp, which would also have changed the total, he is also the first reputed Pope Paul who lives after ASCII was invented, precisely as WLADIMIRA cannot impugn St. Volodimir of Kiev, called Vladimir in Slavonic, since he lived before that too, and even VLADIMIRB cannot impugn Vladimir II Monomach, who also lived before ASCII). (Benediktos adds up the same in Greek, but it can be noted that this denier of inerrancy probably took the name to make gematria irrelevant, and the Greek letters are hundreds, tens and units, namely 500 + 150 + 16 ...).

OK, I wonder if miracles attributed to "John Paul II" have really been by relics, days, portraits of for instance Colleen Slemmer whom we know to have been buried as a Catholic, and probably too young to have come across the remarks pointing to a duty to leave the Vatican II Sect, or other unknown saints ....

21:07 Speaking of the afterlife, is there any situation in which the soul of a murder victim could be in anguish and then find relief by execution of the murderer?

Souls in Hell stay in anguish, souls in Heaven aren't in anguish, though Apocalypse 6 states they may have some degree of "impatience" if you like, probably not the right word, and for souls in Purgatory, the execution of a killer is not an indulgenced action.

Unlike walking to Santiago, if indulgence is the purpose (in my case, it was a petition).

---

Ripperger may have a point about Sedevacantism in so far it says the Papacy remains vacant for soon 70 years.

If Unam Sanctam says that subjection to the Pope is necessary for salvation, that suggests that in the case of a sedevacancy the Church is obliged to elect a Pope.

If cardinals can't do it, or won't do it, bishops. Now, if Sedevacantist bishops didn't want to do it, can you rule out laymen?

Because, in the first millennium, Popes, like other bishops, as is still the case among Orthodox, were elected by popular acclamation, i e by laymen.

Also, a cardinal need not be a priest to vote, hence the theory of Hilaire Belloc that Cardinal Mazarin became stepfather to Lewis XIV. As non-ordained he was free to marry, and did marry Anne of Austria, according to Belloc's work on this king.