co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Monday, October 30, 2023
One-sided reporting?
Hamas Using Women and Children as Human Shields, and Its HQ Is Beneath Gaza's Largest Hospital
CBN News, 30.X.2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk5BYc1RTs4
Excuse me, but if IDF wanted some Gazawis dead, is there any doubt that they would claim the civilians were "human shields"?
[Found out my first comment had been deleted when I tried to add below follow up comment]
For instance about a week ago, a Christian hospital was hit.
Some first claimed it was the IDF. Others _then_ claimed that it was the Hamas which had fired a rocket which either missed or was taken down and fell on the hospital. Obviously, if that is true, the Hamas who were firing were not hiding in that hospital.
Then the claim that Hamas has its main base under a hospital ... is it so urgent to hit a main base that one needs to sacrifice the human shields? This is what I am speaking of:
"Hamas uses all three as cover for its operations in Gaza, including its main base underneath Gaza's largest hospital."
[from description under video]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment