co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, May 25, 2024
She Was Not Javan, and Never Grew Up, But She Was of His Lineage
Was Sungir 1 Magog? · She Was Not Javan, and Never Grew Up, But She Was of His Lineage
Screenshot of Genetic Identfications with Modern Populations:
Neolithic Greece - Nea Nikomedeia DNA Results
Decimali, 24 Jan. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU7Z6gcwNzM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Nea Nikomedeia is a village, now, the carbon dates from it would be between 6200 and 5300 BC.
2332 B. Chr.
0.609109 pmC/100, so dated as 6432 B. Chr.
2309 B. Chr.
0.621506 pmC/100, so dated as 6259 B. Chr.
(2332 + 2309 + 2309)/3 = 2317 BC
(60.9109 + 62.1506 + 62.1506)/3 = 61.73747 pmC
4000 + 2317 = 6317 BC
2220 B. Chr.
0.680023 pmC/100, so dated as 5420 B. Chr.
2198 B. Chr.
0.692256 pmC/100, so dated as 5248 B. Chr.
(2220 + 2198)/2 = 2209 BC
(68.0023 + 69.2256)/2 = 68.61395 pmC
3100 + 2209 = 5309 BC
So, the village would actually be from 2317 to 2209 BC.
https://www.archaeologs.com/w/nea-nikomedeia/en
Post a Comment