Friday, May 3, 2024

Was Sungir 1 Magog?


Was Sungir 1 Magog? · She Was Not Javan, and Never Grew Up, But She Was of His Lineage

Sungir 1 - DNA Results | 30,000 Years Old Gravettian Cro-Magnon Man
Decimali | 4 Jan. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNLOjJkdNwo




2 comments:

Hans Georg Lundahl said...

While some dates were younger due to incomplete removal of contamination, the XAD 14C age on S-1 burial (ca. 29,780 BP) was found to be statistically the same as the previously performed HYP 14C age for this burial (ca. 28,890 BP).

From:

SUNGIR REVISITED: NEW DATA ON CHRONOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE KEY UPPER PALEOLITHIC SITE, CENTRAL RUSSIAN PLAIN
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2022, Yaroslav V Kuzmin et al.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/abs/sungir-revisited-new-data-on-chronology-and-stratigraphy-of-the-key-upper-paleolithic-site-central-russian-plain/D4B96E0AFB03BF2C356153D6DE580AE8


28 890 BP = 26 890 BC
after 2884, before 2860, so close on 100 after the Flood:

2884 av. J.-Chr.
4,804 pcm, donc daté à 27 984 av. J.-Chr.
2860 av. J.-Chr.
5,857 pcm, donc daté à 26 310 av. J.-Chr.

If Magog died young, it could be he.

Hans Georg Lundahl said...

"This contradicts earlier 14C dates made at the Oxford AMS Lab, with collagen extracted following Longin's technique: ≈22 900 BP for Sungir 1; and ≈23 800–24 100 BP (average ≈23 900 BP) for Sungir 2 and 3."

AMS 14C age of the Upper Palaeolithic skeletons from Sungir site, Central Russian Plain
Y.V Kuzmin et al. Volumes 223–224, August 2004, Pages 731-734
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168583X04006603


21 900 BC

2787 av. J.-Chr.
8,996 pcm, donc daté à 22 687 av. J.-Chr.
2762 av. J.-Chr.
10,036 pcm, donc daté à 21 762 av. J.-Chr.

Between 2787 and 2762. 195 after the Flood.

New blog on the kid : Mes plus récentes tables de carbone 14
Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 09:28 Wednesday 1 May 2024
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2024/05/mes-plus-recentes-tables-de-carbone-14.html