Answering Charlie Kirk on Mariology

Mary is the Solution to Toxic Feminism
Charlie Kirk | 23 July 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzUBMlqF1tA

SINLESS

3:18 Yes, I believe Mary was sinless.

Blessed among women be Jahel the wife of Haber the Cinite, and blessed be she in her tent 25 He asked her water and she gave him milk, and offered him butter in a dish fit for princes 26 She put her left hand to the nail, and her right hand to the workman's hammer, and she struck Sisara, seeking in his head a place for the wound, and strongly piercing through his temples 27 At her feet he fell: he fainted, and he died: he rolled before her feet, and he lay lifeless and wretched
[Judges 5:24-27]

And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women 29 Who having heard, was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be
[Luke 1:28-29]

Like, She couldn't remember a particular man rolling down lifeless at Her feet.

And it came to pass, that when Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the infant leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost And she cried out with a loud voice, and said: Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb
[Luke 1:41-42]

So, who was writing lifeless at Her and Her Son's feet? Wait, that reminds Her of something:

And the Lord God said to the serpent: Because thou hast done this thing, thou art cursed among all cattle, and beasts of the earth: upon thy breast shalt thou go, and earth shalt thou eat all the days of thy life I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel
[Genesis 3:14-15]

This is when She brightens up for real. If Satan was "Her Sisera" it means, Sin never dominated Her, since Sin would have been his victory, not Hers over him.

And recall, She had victory over him before the pregnancy. Revise the angel's words ...

And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women [Luke 1:28] Behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name Jesus [Luke 1:31]

So, She had been defeating Satan before God Almighty became Man in Her womb. She wasn't omnipotent Herself. The only victory She could already have is where Adam and Eve were defeated. No. Single. Sin.

ASSUMED INTO HEAVEN

3:50 Yes, Mary was assumed into Heaven:

And the temple of God was opened in heaven: and the ark of his testament was seen in his temple, and there were lightnings, and voices, and an earthquake, and great hail [Apocalypse (Revelation) 11:19]
And a great sign appeared in heaven: A woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars [Apocalypse (Revelation) 12:1]

So, the Woman of Apocalypse 12 is in the end of Apocalypse 11 described as the "ark of his covenant" and if this means the new covenant, that Ark is Mary.

Elisabeth reacts to Mary, like David to the Ark:

And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me
[Luke 1:43]

And David was afraid of the Lord that day, saying: How shall the ark of the Lord come to me?
[2 Kings (2 Samuel) 6:9]

The two covenantal arks contain the same thing, in symbol and in actual fact:

• mannah, because Jesus is the bread from Heaven
• stone tablets, because Jesus' heart in Mary's womb is the noblest engraving of God's law
• rod of Aaron brought to flourish, because Jesus is born of a virgin and will rise from the dead.

Since the temple of God was opened in Heaven and the Ark was there it means Mary is in Heaven.

4:20 For all have sinned, and do need the glory of God.
[Romans 3:23]

Doesn't textually say "except Jesus" ... we agree Jesus is excepted, you should agree the exception is not stated, so, how could a person so close to Jesus be absolutely barred from also being an exception, especially as "blessed among women" actually indicates this?

SEMPER VIRGO

4:43 What is this temple gate:

And the Lord said to me: This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall pass through it: because the Lord the God of Israel hath entered in by it, and it shall be shut
[Ezechiel (Ezeckiel) 44:2]

Is Jesus the Lord the God of Israel?

You know He is, right?

External Locus of Control — Enemies of Free Speech (One Against, One For Heschmeyer)

This is Why they Killed Charlie Kirk
Shameless Popery | 11 sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaWdyJR7SSY

9:49 Does it ever happen that someone on the poorer end of incomes and social connections actually has his life pretty actively mismanaged by others?

Because, once someone has people telling each other and third party that so and so needs others to step in, take responsibility for him or so, then these people are in a golden position to push the person even further away from actually getting back some kind of control over his circumstances, barring radical measures, not limited to violent ones.

And if you can also push the narrative that "external locus of control" is a "predictor of violence" they have an even more golden position to demonise that person and tell each other and third party why so and so can't be allowed to control his life "right now"

A culture of assassination, so far, so good. I agree such circumstances exist, I actually honour Franco's uprising in 1936 precisely because the goal was to end such a thing in the Second Republic Spain. We agree.

Blaming the internet? You may have a clear point in blaming specific sites for specific positions. Blueskye for assassination glorification. 4chan, perhaps Gab too, for pushing gun liberties to where guns become accessible to Robin Westman. On the other hand, one may have a point, no law will control every gun. But equally, no singling out of one single type of scene will eliminate group mentalities that in various ways glorify violence. Owning a gun, fine, but how many people on those sites would recommend to shoot first and ask questions later or call the police if you saw a homeless man intrude into precincts around your habitation in the obvious purpose of putting down his sleeping bag under the cover of your garage or the entrance of your apartment block? While celebrating murder is evil, so is celebrating oppression, sometimes to the point of manslaughter.

But when what you demonise is not a specific ideologeme, but a statement about your situation which can arguably be a true one in some cases, sorry, but you are backing oppression.

What was the journal you were citing again? Catholics shouldn't cite such statements from such journals. Catholics shouldn't be encouraged to believe in shrinks. These have been used to oppress Christians as such since the time of Khrushchev. They have been in oppressive business (with Christian victims, though for other reasons) even longer. Check Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) on the history of psychiatry, including drapetomania.

You are right that I would not be saying this to you face to face. You would interrupt me before I got very far, and presumably in a cordial manner, I'd be momentarily disarmed, and when we parted, I'd be able to kick my own ass for not having said this or not having said that.

But it doesn't mean I don't really mean it, and it actually doesn't mean I dishumanise you by stating these things. Don't end up in positions which, if bishops of older times (like in a council of Meaux in presumably 845, the canon relevant not being limited to Jews) had now been alive, they would have excommunicated you.

10:09 I actually keep and keep and keep trying, and people keep and keep and keep showing me, they don't intend to hand me back control over my life.

With 13 000 + blogposts, many of which are essays, most of which not about my life or my complains, and most of which on subjects that would be interesting in apologetics, to geeks, or to geeks who are into apologetics, I should be able to make a living as a writer.

I find it useless to turn to Hachette or Flammarion, they are on the Evolutionist side. I find it useless to turn to small trad and patriotic publishers in France, I have tried and tried. Whether their point is, a homeless can't get an education to have something interesting to say, or a person who didn't grow up in a French speaking country can't learn good enough French or this or that or sundry of my positions (like preferring Ukraine over Russia ... though not to supporting the bombing of Moscow) rubs them the wrong way, they seem decided (last time I checked) to treat me like a nice guy, but one they can simply ignore. If I try to get a following among young people who haven't started their carreeres yet, in the hope of one of them starting a publishing house with my writings as a starting point, I'm getting demonised both as a "bad influence on the internet" and possibly even as a potential predator.

There are situations where doing the right thing won't get you anywhere. There are people from whom others have taken control away over their lives, and in my case this has not happened legally, I have never been condemned to what's happening now.

10:51 Thanks for mentioning Lukianoff.

In 2021 Lukianoff coined the term Weimar Fallacy in reference to the idea that too much free speech is the true cause of the horrors of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. Lukianoff noted of the Weimar Republic government's campaign of widespread shutdown of Nazi newspapers that: "in a two-year period, they shut down 99 in Prussia alone — but they accelerated that crackdown on speech as the Nazis ascended to power. Hitler himself was banned from speaking in several German states from 1925 until 1927."

I'm probably a victim of that fallacy. I support, like Connor Estelle, Franco, for several things, including ending a period of assassination culture, as well as upholding bans on abortion and introducing bans on freemasonry. For this reason, some see me as an equivalent of Hitler. And find denials or, when that's too blatantly illegal, sabotage of free speech and of the freedoms others have to consult me, including by outright calumny, to be the best way to "avoid making the Weimar mistake".

I've cited wiki referring to:

Eric Berkowitz’s new book ‘Dangerous Ideas’ is a masterpiece, but I have some quibbles
by Greg Lukianoff May 7, 2021
https://www.thefire.org/news/blogs/eternally-radical-idea/eric-berkowitzs-new-book-dangerous-ideas-masterpiece-i-have-some

12:24 Here I'd clearly agree.

What happened with Milo is unacceptable, as well as obviously what happened to his supporter.

And it's very well related to the kind of hate crime Charlie Kirk was killed in.

13:25 "broken bodies" may be a reference to remarks he apologised for considering the age of consent ...

13:25 bis, if it refers to Gazawis, it seems that they were barking up the wrong tree. Milo is not a known supporter of Israel.

24:41 "Christ or Chaos" is a booktitle too. I recalled Dorothy Sayers vaguely, but her book is "Creed or Chaos", while "Christ or Chaos" is a 2016 book by Dan DeWitt.

Tunisians on the Flotilla and on Palestine

The Media Won't Show You THAT in Tunisia
Brent Timm | 11 Sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2RBZz6vN4o

Someone Cancelled Charlie Kirk by Direct Violence, Someone is Cancelling Me in Other Ways

The killing of Charlie Kirk. My statement
Metatron's Academy | 12 Sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JMySiIobcQ

The link I gave in the comment that immediately disappeared:

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: ... on Flood and Mind, part 2
Thursday, January 30, 2014, Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 1:54 AM
https://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2014/01/on-flood-and-mind-part-2.html

And it seems I was wrong, this link is not where I interacted with Thunderf00t, but I just mentioned having interacted with him earlier. Yes, I actually debated Thunderf00t before Charlie Kirk started his debates on Turning Point USA:

Creation vs. Evolution: thunderf00t ... did you actually say that? (part 1)
mercredi 14 novembre 2012, Publié par Hans Georg Lundahl à 09:34
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2012/11/thunderf00t-did-you-actually-say-that.html

So, what's the relevance of Thunderf00t, you may ask? Metatron brought him up as one of the bad actors who liked that Charlie had been shot. Hence my comment in 11:54 to above video.

What's the relevance of me debating anyone, anytime? Well, debating is what Charlie Kirk did. Some would say, that's exactly what he was shot for.

And probably also exactly why my comments have started disappearing from under videos, perhaps a year ago ...

Am I Too Concerned with Numbers?

A Warning to Those Who Want to Be a Catholic Content Creator
The Religious Hippie | 10 Sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U5dCezyzCQ

0:18 Stop looking at crap you shouldn't be looking at.

Obviously does not involve Religious Hippie or Keith Nester.

In context, I thought it was a warning about ending like Charlie Kirk. Like ending the earthly existence, that is.

1:53 I personally need numbers, not least perhaps in France, so a parent can feel good about letting a 20 year old son or daughter start a publishing house.

I have 13 000 + blog posts, not all Apologetics or exploicitly Catholic, so, the problem wouldn't be "can I meet the deadlines" but the problem is, can I get readers.

Meanwhile, I need a publishing house, because my blogs are not monetised, so, anyone reading them is reading them for free, and that's how it should be. It's in order to get pages of real paper to turn that you should pay ... printer and binder, publisher and writer, that last person being me.

So, OK, if someone opened a publishing house in the US or if TAN or Angelus decided, they can already count on readers for me ... less certain in France so far.

[tried to add:

Case in point about the US:

États-Unis
75 + 443 + 84 + 165 + 241 + 423 + 8 + 530 + 72 + 39 + 14 + 76 + 75 + 43 + 69 + 104 + 78 + 991 + 188 + 33 + 318 + 15 + 396 + 80 + 45 + 38 + 16 + 68 = 4727 = 4.73 k
4.73 k + 22.2 k + 9.02 k + 1.72 k + 1.71 k + 5.65 k + 8.16 k + 2.45 k + 2.04 k + 5.64 k + 1.7 k + 1.26 k + 1.01 k + 1.44 k + 1.87 k = 70.6 k

Those are stats for one week = 10 k per day.

Meanwhile, in France, I had a rise from a low at 12 per day to 31 per day.]

Heschmeyer Defends the Rosary, Half Bad, Half Good

Or quarter bad, three quarters good.

Does the Bible Condemn the Rosary ? (Answer to DLM Christian Lifestyle)
Shameless Popery | 9 Sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc-uFyfpGG4

2:34 I avoid the term "unbiblical" or at least try to.

Instead of this, if its not in the Bible as such, I speak of not Biblical or extra-Biblical. Or not explicitly Biblical.
If it's against the Bible, I use the term "anti-Biblical" ...

4:56 I don't think mechanical repetition cuts it either.

When praying the Rosary, and when distracted, one time after time would at least for a few moments fall into mechanical repetition, before you start thinking of the fact you were praying and supposed to meditate on mysteries. So, if "mechanical repetition" were the issue, the Rosary would be, if not forbidden, at least inadvisible. Just as going into a bar with ten friends who are already a bit tipsy doesn't automatically mean you drink alcohol, but is likely to lead to it, and that would be inadvisible to an alcoholic (which I'm not) needing total abstinence to recover.

In fact, Jesus gives us a clue. He says "like the heathens" and He doesn't mean in context Hindoos, Buddhists or Muslims, He means Greco-Roman pagans and a few more.

We have a Pagan prayer from the same year, sixteenth year of Tiberius. It's in the very end of Velleius Paterculus. There is nothing mechanical, and there are no overt verbal repetitions about it.

The kind of stuttering one can read into it is the stuttering of a nervous person. Like Edmund stuttering to the White Witch, once he's in her palace.

Velleius is starting over and over again, in the hope of getting to exactly the right divinity with words exactly calculated to appeal to that divinity to have the prayer answered. Including epithet. Perhaps he didn't get it right with Upholding Jove (Jupiter Stativus), so, he turns to Mars too (forgetting his epithet) and to Vesta (forgetting hers) ... with all those pleas, surely one of them must be the right plea to explain to one of the gods why it's a good idea for them to hear what he's asking?

It's obviously the exact opposed confidence He's inviting us to have to God, Who knows our needs and cares for us, before we speak. The boy who had anular pancreas didn't run around between Carlo Acutis, Thérèse of Lisieux, God the Father, God the Son, making exquisite speeches meant to make a good impression. He prayed with a relic of Carlo Acutis in the simplest possible words and had a full meal that very evening, without throwing up.

5:01 No, a mechanic repetition is NOT what Jesus warns against.

1) That's "thrallein" (like you would do when learning a verb paradigm or learning the lyrics of a song) and the thing banned is "battalogein" (stutter-speak)
2) That's not an issue with the then and there paganism.

If you'd object to this referring to Pervigilium Veneris, which repeats over and over again "cras amet qui nunquam amavit, quique amavit cras amet" this text is so late it is, while overtly Pagan, pretty certainly influenced by Christianity and perhaps even done by Christians cosplaying as Pagans, unless it's by Tiberianus (Neo-Platonic, on that account somewhat closer to Christians than a Classic pagan), and on top of that, it's not even a prayer.

Pretending Jesus warns against mechanic repetition is taking over bad theology and exegesis from Protestants.

11:30 In this second part, you are much better than on Matthew 6:7.

You have nailed it, a certain objection is logical only if it comes from JWs, Muslims or Jews (not meaning Jews for Jesus, but like Tovia Singer). From any actual Christian, it's totally demented.

13:25 Wait, is that also rooted in Charles Spurgeon?

I was just aware of his (rather selective) idea of persisting until someone is saved, or if in fact damned, he should be dying cursing those who tried to save him.

For some reason, he never applied this treatment to politicians causing a manmade starvation on Ireland, but only to the poor, not least people in the street ...

If ever I do make some kind of fan fic on Nimrod, I think I need to make him a Gnostic as well as a slave hunter, considering Spurgeon.

They make a curious exception for a material Bible, printed on paper, though. Their one material sacramental, one would say ...

Climate Clown for Palestine? Or Does "Doom Goblin" Have a Point?

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Those Critics Are Missing a Distinction · Climate Clown for Palestine? Or Does "Doom Goblin" Have a Point? · New blog on the kid: The Man Who Launched Greta

This man has misanalysed Greta about the village / coal mine arrests before. The German police didn't have any orders to obstruct reporting, they only had orders to obstruct the human obstructions to a coal mine. This man who thinks in terms of Brasilian police misunderstood it. Now he's at it again, but this time he's at least curious.

Greta Thunberg caught in her BIGGEST LIE ever
The Body Language Guy | 7 Sept. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbZ__5xeemg

2:46 Have you heard of the nuclear waste problem?

There was a time when nuclear power was more of an environmental issue than carbon emissions, I'm kind of from that era and kind of suspect carbon scares have been fabricated to repromote nuclear power (except in Iran, of course).

Plus, obviously, if you have nuclear plants in a country, and someone else wants to damage it, they are an easy target with high potential for damage.

4:20 Living longer and healthier?

More like, if you lived long in earlier ages, you were healthy, but if you do now, it happens you are a product of pharmaceutic dependencies.

Fewer wars? Perhaps fewer micro-wars and feuds, but more prolonged wars and conclicts running and rerunning into wars.

If we look to war deaths in the European population, in % it's basically an escalation from 1200's to 1900's, except that the 1600's (with the Thirty Years' War) stands out as the worst prior to the 1900's and the two World Wars.

6:31 Have you heard of storage of nuclear waste, again?

The formation that makes up Yucca Mountain was created by several large eruptions from a caldera volcano and is composed of alternating layers of ignimbrite (welded tuff), non-welded tuff, and semi-welded tuff. The volcanic units have been tilted along fault lines, thus forming the current ridge line called Yucca Mountain. In addition to these faults, Yucca Mountain is criss-crossed by fractures, many of which formed when the volcanic units cooled.

Is it just a coincidence that Shoshone living there have browner skin than typical NY state dwellers, where no one is storing nuke waste?

7:00 AI is if anything another argument against Nuclear Power.

7:26 everyone and everything follows money and power interests ... except Greta, famously didn't.

She refused to look at the money and power interests that would be upset by her activism. And as a bonus won some onto her side.

8:00 Greta actually isn't using Palestine as propaganda for Environmentalism.

She's badgered about the topic, and she answers. But she's not making a point about it herself.

How about that brilliant analysis of a girl pretended to be seen threatening with a knife and hatchet, when she's actually retreating?* Why are your analytic skills lower on this issue?

9:17 Greta has said "it has to do with climate justice" but how many others have used that language, when they are not being asked?

Rima Hassan? Thiago Avila? Liam Cunningham?

The point is, you don't wipe terrorists out by wiping out civilians. And it doesn't matter if you point guns and fire or block food access, either way you are wiping out civilians. The clowns, as you put it, have shown, beyond the shadow of a doubt, and confirmed by doctors working in Gaza, low access to food is NOT just an accident, but an actual goal of Israel.

There was a child who was getting a prothesis with Madleen, Israelis have so far not clarified the child actually got it after they arrested Greta in international waters, which is an act of piracy.

You call them clowns. "Be a clown, be a clown, all the world loves a clown" ... except those who for some reason haven't. Perhaps Netanyahu rewatched "It" a few times too often.

9:25 "The people who are financing her?"

Registered charities, whether you mean "Fridays for the Future" or "Freedom Flotilla" ...

If Red Cross goes to a rescue mission to a disaster struck country in Africa, those financing them are generally people who believe in that charity.

You don't ask "did Soros finance the Red Cross" even though Soros on occasion was a donor. You accept that the Red Cross functions, mainly, because of people like you and me spending some coffee change on donating to the Red Cross a few times a year. Plus some richer people want to make tax deductions. Well, Fridays for the Future, the charity that she helped to open up a few years ago, and Freedom Flotilla, the one she's working for currently, are also run as publically registered charities.

9:53 A clear example of "environmental racism" would be "we can't stock nuclear waste where white people live in hoards, but if the country is poor and inhabited by brown skinned people, we can use economic leverage to stock nuclear waste in their country" ... now, this is not the Palestinian case, what about hearing her sentence out?

10:17 How about this scenario. People in Europe access the same electrity. People in the Third World access the same nuclear waste ... I think that kind of sounds racist.

10:46 Yeah, what about countries which are invested in precisely because they produce things without expensive emission cleaning?

Oh, no one can emit those quantities of sulphur in Europe? The filters that would catch it are expensive and augment the production cost by ten to twenty percent? Well, there are countries that can't afford to sit on their high horses when it comes to enforcing regulations. Like because they are endebted ...

I would call that solution environmentally racist. Pushing the pollution to poorer people with fewer regulations because they live in the Global South and suffer Neo-Colonialism.

Get children working in a dangerous unhealthy mine in Europe? You go to prison. Make someone do it in Africa? Georgia Meloni just pointed out that France is earning money that way.

11:17 She basically said "if all we care about is a clean environment in First World Countries, that's a luxury and privilege" ... or in other words, man made starvation is worse than man made pollution (if the levels are anywhere like supposed to be safe).

11:38 Climate welfare: people in Europe and (most states of) the US and Canada have a clean environment.
Climate justice: we don't buy that by pushing the pollution on poorer countries which can't afford to regulate.
Broader justice: we don't want poorer people to suffer manmade starvation either.

The only point where she was unclear was she didn't verbally distinguish climate justice from broader justice as two different concepts.

Apart from that, she has basically repeated the Swedish King Oscar II saying "not free trade, but fair trade" ... I bet she bought choclate and her parents coffee from Max Havelaar before Fridays for the Future.

---

* It exactly parallels my own analysis of the white mother who confronted a Somali child who had taken her own child's toy without asking. The video of her repeating the N word is a video with her retreating with her own baby, and being harrassed by a man with a phone with a camera, not a video of her chasing someone else's child.