co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Tuesday, December 5, 2023
On the Name of God Predating Exodus 3:14
Muslim Preacher Publicly Declares Islam FALSE
Apostate Prophet | 25 June 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYbBqK0_7FQ
1:48 Possibly Moses was aware of Canaanites abusing the name IHVH and therefore did not dare to use it without special revelation (Exodus 3:14).
Certainly God was aware they were going to, hence He did not reveal it to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He did not say He had not revealed it earlier on, for instance in the day of Enos (Genesis 4:26), or if "call on" is euphemism for blaspheme, perhaps already to Adam and Eve.
Obviously, this is only a possible argument for those of us who admit Genesis 11 is history.
In later chapters of Genesis, we do not see Abraham or descendants say "Lord, help" or "Lord, hear" ...
A search on first phrase gave Genesis 2:18, and on the latter we have Genesis 23, where a man of gentile stock is calling Abraham "lord" ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment