co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, January 6, 2024
What was "Pope Francis" Discussing with Ghislaine Maxwell?
Epstein Documents: Pope Poses with Topless Ghislaine Maxwell? #pope #catholic
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vL64_cpqMYA
My comment here, first:
Michael Lofton exonerated him from being present when she was topless, but that's all.
So, given what she is known for, does anyone see it as somewhat suspicious that Bergoglio was seen with her at all?
Oh, I'm not speaking directly of the sex offenses.
I'm speaking of her father being involved in probably three different intelligence services: MI6, Mossad and KGB.* I hope I'll have the time to source it tomorrow or next week!/HGL
* I suppose it was already known as that back then? It was anyway past the time when it was the Cheka, I'm sure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment