co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, September 7, 2024
Forbidden to Say I Refuse to Deconstruct, Refuse LGBTQ?
@AllieBethStuckey
The truth about deconstruction
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_J5BlbW7t3s
I'm so thankful I'm not even tempted to change my views on sexual morality.
Act contrary to them (though heterosexually!) yes, I would sometimes be tempted. But change them? Nope and noper!
[saw it was deleted, when I tried to add]
If anyone claims I'm "deconstructing" it's their (probably very interested) analysis, not my actual words.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment