co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Sunday, December 8, 2024
Tiktaalik, Rifkin, Gilgamesh
Atheists LOVE to Boast This So-Called “Proof” of Evolution
Answers in Genesis Canada | 14 June 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESZNrDv1Xgo
9:09 "It's our creation now."*
This is obviously the implication of Darwinism, but it is also the implication of Deism, of Freemasonry, of calling God "great architect of the universe" ... implying the architect of a house need not be its denizen or lord.
When Evolution comes down as untenable, there will certainly be Theistic attempts at salvaging this set of values.
It's inherently collectivistic. If we have one lord, each can appeal to that one lord. If we haven't, who gets what becomes a question of power dynamics, like in late Protestant Prussia the philosophies of Bismarck, Roon and Moltke.
What else is collectivistic? Babylon.
The extant parts of Enuma Elish are perfectly compatible with mankind created by the gods as a collective, and the opening lines of Gilgamesh imply mankind was created with cities and bakeries from get-go.
* The one saying so is Jeremy Rifkin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment