co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Wednesday, June 25, 2025
On This One, Dan McClellan is Right
Was there an ancient Palestine?
Dan McClellan | 2 April 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cHNIu2tdH4
1:57 Given that one on board the Madleen is called Yannis, Greek form of John, was the Israeli Coast Guard paranoid about a reincursion of the Sea Peoples?
3:30 "Arabs and Muslims"
Right. If most Irish speak English and if most Bosniaks are Muslims, it proves that the Gaels were replaced by Anglo-Saxons and the Slavs by Turks, right? So very not.
Christian Palestinians, as this group, have roots in Acts 2 (church of Jerusalem) and Acts 8 (church of Samaria).
That some of them later (like some Mitsrahi Jews) gave up their religion for Islam or even those who didn't gave up Christian Palestinian Aramaic for Arabic in the time of the countercrusade by Baybars, would you mind finding the appropriate "Religion for Breakfast" video, please, doesn't change their origins.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment