co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Tuesday, June 24, 2025
Response to Sir David Attenborough
Sir David Attenborough On God
Gerry Watts PoL | 8 May 2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI7f3xVgZdA
3:06 The rocks permit an interpretation involving the Flood.
Yes, exactly the same rocks that in Karoo are interpreted as between 303 and 180 million years (Ma) ago.
Because a fossil from the Beaufort Group (oldest land fauna in Karoo) and one from the Drakensberg Group can have grazed or otherwise roamed the region side by side, same occasion, when the Flood hit and buried them in mud.
And there are not just creation stories, but also Flood stories around the world. ONE of them gives proportions of the Ark such that it was likely not to capsize or to roll too fast for the comfort of those aboard. I calculated rolling period, supposing the water line was 15 cubits up, such that the rolling period matched that of passenger cruisers.
You can hardly do that with a Mesopotamian super-coracle or cube.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment