Monday, October 21, 2013

... to Dawkins' "finest"

Video comented on:
ForaTv : Richard Dawkins: One Fact to Refute Creationism
Hans-Georg Lundahl
The only alternative to it being a family tree is that the Intelligent Designer intended it as a catalogue - of resemblances.

But He does enjoy making "diviners of secrets" to nought. So he does allow evolutionist pseudoscientists to deceive themselves (by bad logic) on this one.

As also with "distant starlight" argument after not yet proving Heliocentrism so far.

Dawkins is also unnecessarily insulting Curt Wise, Geologist.

"If all the evidence in the universe pointed to an old earth" - unreal mood - "I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a YEC".

He admits to putting Bible over evidence. But he does not admit there is any evidence that conflicts with the Bible and he claims he would admit it if there was such.

Dawkins has not refuted, only ridiculed.

It seems he is the one who is holding his ears saying "la la la".
Not great on analysis, are you? Don't try for a law degree (as if)
Hans-Georg Lundahl
If you have one, that might explain why lawyers suck these days.

No comments: