Friday, July 15, 2016
... on Radiometric Dating
1) Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : ... on Geological Column · 2) ... on Radiometric Dating · 3) Creation vs. Evolution : Guy Berthault's Results May Not Prove the Flood Factual, They Prove it Possible · 4) back to Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : ... on Radiometric Dating with Tony Reed · 5) ... on Presentation of my Inquest on Geological Column, with Tony Reed
How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 17 Radiometric Dating
Carbon 14 dating?
You might enjoy this:
Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Letter A of ex oriente - I - preliminary to recalibrating
What was I supposed to enjoy?
A Creationist redating of Natufian etc. cultures.
Using one of my own recalibrations of the C14 method.
As you may know, if only x is left, that means so many thousand years old. 35% > 8000.
So, if at a certain period there were only 35%, organic things that were breathing back then (wood or other plant derivatives felled orharvested back then, dead or killed men or animals), they get 8000+ years "for free" - by the dating method not taking possibility of C14 rise into account.
Now, I did one scenario of at what pace this could have happened, in French essay here:
New blog on the kid : Avec un peu d'aide de Fibonacci ... j'ai une table, presque correcte
And I used that exact scenario to readjust Natufian into the Biblical timescale. In the English essay I just linked to.