Trying To Read A Creationist Propaganda Textbook
Miniminuteman | 29 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9cMdAKcBuQ
9:00 No design flaw for Edenic conditions, where there would have been no stress.
No design flaw for post-Edenic conditions, where stressing out may come with punishments.
And a design total bonus, as it allows us to speak ...
9:42 The problem isn't whether thoughtless process or "magic" as you like to put it is easier to understand but whether either of them makes the rest even possible to understand
10:46 You are welcome.
Your taste for beer and the acknowledgement that IPA isn't the best do help. My gramp was a brewer (technically), i e a distiller (factually) (distillers are part of the brewer's union in Sweden)
11:39 The mere existence of modern geology?
OK, if I were to tell you that studying the stars (what was ascending on the horizon, where Sun, Moon and other planets were) when someone was born doesn't give you any kind of authoritative clue to that someone's character, is that debunked by the mere existence of astrology?
13:59 The Flood was not in this sense "one event" ...
A flock of ammonites gets trapped? Yep, there is a layer with ammonites ...
A few microorganisms get squeezed? Yep, there is limestone (three layers, I think)
A mountain or two get sandpapered and the débris needs depositing? Can you spell Coconino!?
The Flood didn't happen in one day ... OK. Therefore not "one event" in this sense.
14:12 Uniformitarianism also says that warves are not necessarily layers ... they are undulations when a layer is deposited from oversaturated emulsion.
The late Guy Berthault showed this experimentally.
Creationists, we typically don't criticise overall uniformitarianism without some kind of support in uniformitarianism on the details level.
1570. Johannes Kepler. Are we surprised at all that a guy in 1570 was a creationist? It's really funny to be like, "See guys, look at all these dudes that were creationists." And then just refer to a time in history where it was the best understanding that we had of the world because we hadn't discovered science yet.
So technically you agree that Kepler by being Heliocentric had not discovered science?
More seriously, you seem bent on making Evolution the hallmark of science.
While my gramp was Agnostic and Evolutionist, the science he got about Saccharomyces (yes, Absolut is distilled from a kind of beer, just like Cognac is distilled from a kind of wine) ... he didn't need to believe Microbes to Man Evolution to get that part.
16:39 No, we can't see organisms changing over time.
They are dead.
Are you trying to make succession of faunas (or floras) an argument for using rock layers to date millions of years, just as rock layers?
A little hint though. I believe that the skeleta or fossils of Tautavel classified as Homo erectus, dated to 550,000 to 400,000 years ago and the skeleta or fossils of Permian critters in Karoo were laid to rest in the same sequence of events, starting in Iyar of Noah's 600's years. If I'm wrong, how about digging below Caune de l'Arago until you hit, presumably a km lower, something from the Permian?
16:41 "you look at that"
Which diagramme, as even Kent Hovind knew, is nowhere found in the terrain.
He's not my absolute fav, I do prefer CMI, but you don't find Stegosaurs in Grand Canyon, for instance.
17:39 You will never find a rock with trilobites beginning to look like lampreys.
You are also unusually safe when speaking of trilobites, since these are marine creatures.
Give me a rock where they find a Uinthatherium and 200 meters further down a Stegosaur ... I'm not going to say "I'm waiting" ... I'd rather show a skeleton on a bench with the sign "still waiting for Milo Rossi to explain where land vertebrate fauna has been found in two superposed layers.
Nowhere on the [ __ ] planet has all of this because how the [ __ ] would you get all of this in one place?
You said it.
It's not there.
You can obviously explain the incompleteness of your proof, but it still leaves the proof incomplete ...
So, when you find a really good fossil record from a certain area, it's normally only for a certain time span.
And, curiously, that timespan is usually not two time spans with millions of years between, unless both levels are marine ...
La Brea Tar Pits, 10 000 to 40 000 years ago = 401 years from Flood to Birth of Peleg ...
The parts dated older than 39 000 years ago are reservoir effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment