Give it some time ...

The Dishonesty of Deconstruction from Faith
Brian Holdsworth | 28 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SieaNTx28V4

8:13 "axioms that are unproven"

Because they are axioms? Like, by definition, axioms aren't proven, but intuitive and what other proofs rely on.

9:55 OK, can you find me an atheist capable of understanding and answering:

These are two syllogisms, they make different things axiomatic, the one that makes the most sense is the one that concludes for God:

Atheist syllogism:

If Tychonian geocentrism is physically true about the universe, given the complexities of movement, this has to be done by rational beings with will. But there are no brains and therefore no beings with will and mind on this scale, therefore Tychonian geocentrism is physically untrue.

Theist syllogism:

If Tychonian geocentrism is physically true about the universe, given the complexities of movement, this has to be done by rational beings with will. But Tychonian geocentrism is what we optically and otherwise observe. Therefore rational beings with will are powerful enough to get all celestial objects around the Earth in roughly speaking 24 h (23h55 for stars, 24h55 for the Moon), to the outermost of observed visible realities. However, this involves either all of them obeying one, or one being so much stronger than all the rest that it's he who turns the universe around us each day, therefore God exists.