How Noah’s Ark Debunks the WHOLE Bible
Holy Koolaid | 30 April 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6apFLhUjYs
0:40 Compiling the accounts of people who were there, except for the first five creation days, when it's arguably God or angels speaking to or showing Moses.
1:17 Not necessarily just seasonal.
2:26 Suigetsu would have made many warves some time after the Flood ... not just two per year.
2:50 I place the Flood at 2957 BC, 4982 years ago ...
3:06 I don't think you can get the age of Pando Aspen colony from dendrochronology alone.
3:22 You are basically appealing to carbon dates of the cities you identify by archaeology.
Like Jericho. Carbon dated (like Göbekli Tepe) to 9000 BC at its start, well, I'd place it within the first third of the 51 year old span between death of Noah and birth of Peleg, so, between:
- 2608 BC
- 43.443 pmC, 9500 BC
and
- 2591 BC
- 46.223 pmC, dated as 8970 BC
If you check the pmC's "age implication" I'm giving the instant age, and add that to the actual age ... you get the accepted carbon date.
Newer Tables, Flood to Joseph in Egypt
4:20 Creationists have alternative reports on the coral reefs, making their start match the Flood.
4:34 Emil Silvestru and Michael Oard have answered about speleothems ...
Rapid growth of caves and speleothems: part 1—the excavation of the cave
part 2—growth rate variables
part 3—Flood and Ice Age variables
The supposed problem literally is the answer to the problem you pose.
5:03 Sorry, but you forget that a Creationist will consider all speleothems as post-Flood.
I'd include caves where pre-Flood Neanderthals are buried, like the speleothems came there later.
5:40 You forget the effects of rapid outbreeding after the Flood.
6:14 You are presuming the global ocean was salt water.
But in fact, if much came from rain, that part wouldn't have been salt and the part with subterranean waters would have different salinities depending on what source it was from. Now, when waters with different salinities meet, they would not necessarily mix.
But on top of that, water has been getting salter in oceans since the Flood, from salt that remained subterranean until and until after the Flood, slowly getting washed out.
6:44 Viable mechanism to where it came from.
1) Part came from Brown's gas, when the oxygen layer went higher up and the hydrogen layer went further down (spatial hydrogen is part of waters above the firmement, btw).
2) Part from subterranean cavities.
Where it went to.
1) Deep Sea basins immediately were formed, and have deepened since.
2) Evaporation and locking water in ice has after the Flood taken care of some water until the Marianas trench became deep enough.
6:50 "including the top of Mount Everest"
Mount Everest is a post-Flood rise. I take it the Himalayas were rising so rapidly first centuries after the Flood that the earliest traces of man on the Sivalik hills, well below the top of Mount Everest, only became inhabitable for man some time after Babel, so more than 401 years after the Flood.
Himalayas ... how fast did they rise? · Himalayas, bis ... and Pyrenees · ter · quater · quinquies ... double-checked
7:04 I think you misunderstand old writing quite a lot.
The Narmer palette you showed doesn't have any text attached. Or, correction, it has serekhs, giving for instance the name of Narmer.
The oldest texts with continuous content, like a page or two, are carbon dated to 2600--2700 BC.
They are still not back then giving complete chronologies. The first time you get King Lists in Egypt is in the New Kingdom. They give chronologies. Nothing shows these chronologies were actually there in the time of the pharaos concerned.
Stories are evidence of the past, and "mythological" is a label with very little precise meaning. · Continuing with Ernest Crunkleton · It's Not Over Yet
7:09 "and in multiple languages"
all of them post-Babel, carbon dated 2600 BC being during the soujourn of the Israelites in Egypt according to my "Newer tables" (I may be doing a revision with Amenhotep II as pharao of the Exodus, not yet incorporated).
Babel by contrast is Göbekli Tepe, carbon dated 9500 to 8000 BC, for real dates 2608 to 2557 BC.
Newer Tables, Joseph in Egypt to Fall of Troy, places 2600 carbon dated in 1678 BC, for Babel see previous link.
8:50 Both your resumé of Flood Myths and your resumé of Geology shows "you know how to listen" in a very specific way, a bit how New Agers "know how to listen" for certain things, including BS like ascended masters ...
No comments:
Post a Comment