Michael II Remains My Pope

New blog on the kid: Leo XIV (if such) Refers to Leo XIII ... and Leo XII? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Michael II Remains My Pope · An interview with Pope Michael by Christian Wagner .... Second Part of Video · Ulysses Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman, Theologians? · Dialogue Continued

Leo XIV - The Shocking Truth Almost No One Is Talking About
vaticancatholic.com | 18 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm2BdnYKgGY

I basically rejected him yesterday or this night, when hearing his view on "doctrine" and "indoctrination" ...

He'd have a lot of explaining to do before one could accept him as Catholic, and while it is just theoretically conceivable that he might one day admit that Creationists have what in a structural and meta way calls "doctrine" and Evolutionists have "indoctrination" (though this was not the context), he would probably be aware that the words having the connotation they have, many will take that quote and pretend it's immoral to raise children as Young Earth Creationists, let alone Geocentrics.

5:40 Notorius Arian ... sounds like el obispo intruso de Alexandria, Jorge, enemigo de San Atanasio ...

As my second name is George (German / Swedish spelling), I think it's a better name for knights than for bishops. Bätzing is also not a publicity for bishops wearing that name. I vastly prefer Clement August ... or Athanasius.

Unfortunately some things speak for Jorge Bergoglio to indeed have believed with the Porvoo Communion, which I left for the Novus Ordo in 1988 (I actually stepped out of CoS only months or weeks before the conversion, I had assumed that the Catholic Church would have been taking care of the paperwork). And as I've been in it, I know some horror stories about its theology.

15:29 Depends on how many decades.

1958 to 1990 is 32 years. (Or if Siri was Pope, 1989 to 1990 is one year, he could not have secret successors, since agreeing to secrecy on the spot of election would make the acceptance invalid). Are you still boycotting Popes Michael I and II because they are not Feeneyite, while Pius XII was also not so?

15:34 The vacancy you speak of ended before the prophecy in Jeremias 30, if that was the chapter, since it is about Jesus Christ.

He was both of the house of David (obviously) and of the house of Aaron (since His Blessed Mother was first cousin to St. Elisabeth Cohen). So, since He came, there has not been a vacancy in the kingdom of Israel.

---

Reasons for Hope! | FORWARD BOLDLY
Christine Niles | 18 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_xLhURpPIo

16:03 "So recall for Duchess supercuts okay,"

Do you still believe in AI? Those are the automated subtitles.

Fiducia Supplicans = for Duchess supercuts ?

25:50 Wonder if Strickland will submit to Pope Michael II?

26:05 Oh, Monsignor Strickland was a Bene-Vacantist or Bene-Plenist as I have also seen it spelled.

26:42 You have just exquisitely well outlined the problem with those who say (as does for instance Salza) "a heretical pope can be judged by the Church and is only after that removed from office" ...

IF Francis was a) heretical and b) still pope anyway, since not yet deposed in the way the theory outlines, then, the if-so-pope could just remove from office anyone accusing him of heresy.

Strickland and Vigano have done what Salza's theory outlines for the deposing of Bergoglio.

Obviously this is not what St. Robert Bellarmine actually said.

27:47 How many liberal bishops had any motive to depose Bergoglio?

It's a bit like saying Protestants had a motive to depose Edward VI or James VI and I. Or Cromwell, perhaps a better parallel.

It's like saying Marxists had a motive for claiming Obama stole the 2008 election.

So, since liberals had no motive, the parallel of a liberal bishop also getting deposed "in that case" is fairly unrealistic.

28:51 Popes have been sending diplomatic missives to Protestant rulers, but not to Protestant bishops.

And any missive to any Protestant community as "ecclesial" would arguably have involved an injunction to convert.

Nostra Aetate was one reason David Bawden, later Pope Michael I, concluded that Vatican II was not an actual council and therefore Roncalli and Montini not actual Popes.

30:27 I'll be happy to read the invitation in that light when he tells Jews things like "so, you don't believe the prophets considered The Son of Man as divine, what do you do of this passage?" or "so, you don't believe Jesus fulfilled Isaiah 11, but what about the Church involving both Jerusalem (Judah) and Samaria (Ephraim), or what about it spreading to Edom, Moab and Ammon when the Church of Jerusalem fled to Pella, hasted by invading Roman legionaries, or to the Mediterranean on the Greek (Philistine) ships that carried St. Paul?"

So far, I have not seen that.

41:02 When he's talking about "sidetrack" I'm afraid he may have things like Creationism and strict Thomism and Geocentrism in mind.