All My Comments Were Taken Down except the one showing me conscious of the meaning of two White Supremacy Codes · Rochester Minnesota
Now some more are up again.
Was I deemed "racist" for defending a person with apparently some racist ideas, when the situation wasn't really about them?
If you check out the label NYTN you will see that I'm usually typically for Danielle Romero and her quest for racial equality and her deep and righteous hatred against some evil deeds of scientific and political racism previously committed.
They Gave Her $580,000 for Saying the N-Word
NYTN | 4 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXKJ3M1ZqrY
3:39 14 = "14 words", 88 = "HH."
On the go fund me, she expressed feeling threatened.
I don't think she did a correct thing calling a child the N word in the US, and especially not explaining "if he acts like one" ... but I do feel the guy who told her off came off as somewhat threatening.
You get what I'm saying?
- Leigh Carlson
- @RevLeigh55
- She’s the threat, not anyone else.
She’s a snowflake. Okay for her to be threatening but when it’s dished back, she turns into a victim.
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @hglundahl
- @RevLeigh55 I think calling her a threat is overdoing it.
@ I think she was insulting, but not actually threatening.
- A C
- @aleathacoleman6413
- I don't think she was being threatened. She was the aggressor here. She was being called out for being racist.
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @ She was certainly being called out, but in an angry voice, by a man who was bigger than she and who continued when she walked away.
- Jayne77
- @wendyraby3134
- @hglundahl she is at least 10 times bigger than the child she is chasing and calling a racial slur. the man is not doing any of that to her he is just calling her out. The way you think the person calling her out is the problem is definitely the entire problem of this country and why we have all these issues. Children should be protected above all others! what the hell is wrong with you all?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @wendyraby3134 You did not see she was protecting her own child?
I cannot be the problem of your country, any more than you can be the problem of Sweden (where I am from) or France (where I now reside).
But I described what I saw in another comment, directly under the video, if you care to continue there.
- Trollingizlife
- @trollingizlife2298
- An autistic 5 year old threatened her?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @ [Trollingizlife] No, but threatened HER child who was younger than 5.
THEN the Somalians around the 5 year old threatened her, including the guy with the phone / camera, who never bothered to excuse the five year old boy or give back the toy himself, but just reacted with anger and indignation because she had used one word which the 5 year old boy arguably didn't even understand.
The only thing we see her doing on camera is walking away with her own child, his gotten-back plush toy and answer "yes, I did call him that" ...
[My offer became ineffective because my comments were taken down, except the first one.]
So one mother, one child, younger than five, probably three.
She is apparently seeing a child of five, so bigger than her own, who is with his parent PLUS a friend of the family who records, and who has an accent as from Indian Subcontinent. At least the one recording is an adult male.
The part we see recorded she has taken back the toy and her child, and is backing away.
I'm not super happy with her use of a certain word, but as far as I can tell, she was quickly reacting when her child's toy was taken away and she is now getting away, she is clearly outnumbered. She is being recorded, I don't know for what exact purpose, but I would not be surprised if:
a) the man first went to the police and tried to sue her
b) that failing, went to media to paint her in a morally shady tone.
On the footage, we do NOT see her bullying a five year old black (or from-India, not Amerindian) autistic boy. We do NOT see her chasing a child. We see her backing off from a man chasing her with a phone used as a camera.
I could not quite leave the suspicion that the boy was actually his, and that in fact he was insulted over his India or Pakistan or Bengali race being "wrongfully" equated with the race of khaffirs.
I don't know how much in the news article is based on footage and how much on the oral story by that man. I would not be surprised if he had changed the story a bit after failing with the police.
There are immigrants who very well will overpolice "racism" and sometimes take non-racists for racists as well. She arguably is racist, but that doesn't mean she was in the wrong this time or that the story hasn't taken an undeservedly unpleasant turn for her. It also doesn't mean she is responsible for every crime racist scientists or racist elected politicians have committed.
Minnesota mom rakes in over $500K after calling boy with autism the N-word
NY Post | Katherine Donlevy | Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:10 PM GMT+2
https://www.aol.com/minnesota-mom-rakes-over-500k-171027251.html
Police investigate after white mother used racist slur at Minnesota park
May 3, 2025, 3:30 AM GMT+2 / Updated May 3, 2025, 4:30 AM GMT+2 / By Nollaig O'Connor and Dennis Romero
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rochester-minnesota-park-racist-rcna204553
I watched the full clip presented by NBC news.
We have not seen her chase anyone on that clip. We have seen her with her own child, backing off.
The so, the group she was facing were three Somali children, Somali, not Afro-American.* The dad, Omar, who takes the camera while she's retreating. AND his two parents who are also there.
This is the kind of situation where I can't totally blame some people for turning to Nazi groups. As for herself, she's trying to relocate. That's pretty obviously a backfiring that goes way over the top.
[tried to add]
Sorry, Omar was not the dad of the child of five, he was a friend of the family.
* See Slavery in Somalia
The Italian colonial administration abolished slavery in Somalia at the turn of the 20th century. However, some Somali clans notably the Biimaal clan opposed this idea. The Biimaals fought the Italians to keep their slaves. From 1893, the Italian colonial authorities in Somalia did not recognize the legal status of slavery and slaves were thus legally free to leave their owners, but the Italians often returned fugitive slaves to their owners if the owners belonged to clans friendly to the Italians; in 1903–1904, after pressure from humanitarians, the Italians banned the slave trade and declared that all slaves born after 1890 were legally free.
...
The Italians reported to the Advisory Committee of Experts on Slavery in the 1930s that the slavery and slave trade in Somalia had now been abolished.[29]: 226 However, although the Italians freed some Bantus, some Bantu groups remained enslaved well into the 1930s and continued to be despised and discriminated against by large parts of Somali society.[23]: 29–30
[23] On the Google Book, pages 29—30 cannot be consulted, after index, the first consultable page is 73.
[29] Miers, Suzanne (2003). Slavery in the Twentieth Century: The Evolution of a Global Problem. Walnut Creek, CA (US): AltaMira Press. ISBN 978-0759103405.
No comments:
Post a Comment