Monday, June 23, 2025

Not Bad, Mr. President!


🚨Trump Stuns World: Announces PEACE DEAL Between Israel and Iran: 'We Win, World War 3 is Cancelled’
Benny Johnson | 24 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roaDM7j0XQI


Great work, Mr. Trump.

Now that is out of the way, perhaps he might broker:
  • Israel paying damages for the kidnapping of the Madleen
  • Israel opening up non-UNWRA contributions to the Gazawis, apart from those provided by Israel itself.


[A certain detail:]

Real estate boom on stolen land. The American dream
Nicole Jenes Entertainment | 12 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viVRF4ZTde4

St. Bridget of Vadstena Taking Down the Words of Our Lord


Saint Bridget of Sweden Prophecies and Revelations Jesus explains His Divine and Human Nature
Penance Podcast | 21 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJmVoee84HE

Job Revisited


Ken Ham SHREDS Evolution with One Simple Question
Ken Ham | 20 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzawwl3cIPs


3:39 You are aware of the one occasion when he was doubting God, what he repented of?

After this Job opened his mouth, and cursed his day And he said Let the day perish wherein I was born, and the night in which it was said: A man child is conceived
[Job 3:1-3]

Do you know why this is what God and Job were referring to?

Let a darksome whirlwind seize upon that night, let it not be counted in the days of the year, nor numbered in the months Let that night be solitary, and not worthy of praise Let them curse it who curse the day. who are ready to raise up a leviathan Let the stars be darkened with the mist thereof: let it expect light and not see it, nor the rising of the dawning of the day
[Job 3:6-9]

God in chapter 38 appears like a whirlwind, and mentions precisely Leviathan and stars.

God was telling Job:

But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by heaven, for it is the throne of God Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black
[Matthew 5:34-36]

How do I know God did NOT disapprove of what Job told his comforters?

And after the Lord had spoken these words to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Themanite: My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends, because you have not spoken the thing that is right before me, as my servant Job hath
[Job 42:7]

"as my servant Job hath" ... in other words, to the comforters, God approved of Job's words.

Does C. S. L. oversimplify politics, or is that just a Commie trope?


Prince Caspian · Does C. S. L. oversimplify politics, or is that just a Commie trope?

5 Pitfalls of Writing Political Fantasy and how to fix them
Just In Time Worldbuilding | 13 Aug. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m1HFZXmW1s


10:33 You may have missed that C. S. Lewis on each occasion evaded your pitfalls of the rightful heir.

1) LWW, the rightful kings and queens are kings and queens of prophecy and have a messianic rather than narrowly political dimension (even if de facto they also rule politically).
2) Prince Caspian, the precisely allies of the rightful heir make for a real shift in power (again with a messianic dimension, since the Pevensies are on the side of Caspian X.
3) Having the rightful heir hostage would have so to speak demonically reversed Prince Caspian, in service of the Lady of the Green Kirtle rather than of Aslan. Here it is not so much the rightful heir that sets things in order as being prevented from acting in the service of foreign invaders.

You did miss out on two periods where a lack of an obvious rightful heir set the country into chaos.

1) Between King Frank's dynasty and the White Witch
2) Between the Pevensies and the Telmarine invasion.

This has a parallel in real history with the false Dmitriys and the decades when the Russian crown was up for grabs, and obviously in the War of the Roses and in the English invasion of France during the Hundred Years' War. In fact, the Pevensies in Prince Caspian function a bit like St. Joan of Arc in the French national revival.

What you argue for is pretty much analysing power on modern conventions, CSL analysed it on Medieval principles ... without actually losing the complexity.

10:40 It's purpose is not to serve as a metaphor for Christianity, that part purpose is rather exploring what Christianity would look like in another world.

10:58 Song of Ice and Fire also oversimplifies the distinction between Christian monarchy (War of the Roses) and Pagan Caesarianism (the mores of Nero, for instance).

By contrast, CSL does give examples of evil and overreaching (both internally and internationally) monarchy, in Charn and in Calormen (and no, Calormen is not a metaphor for Islam).

11:13 CSL shows up with other forms of governance too.

Hermit of the Southern March and Marshwiggles show self reliance, a kind of anarchy.

The complexities of Trade in Lone Islands are a nice showcasing of the failures of modern Democracy and Bureaucracy to show humanity.

For that matter, the rise of Miraz to power (featured in both Prince Caspian and in Voyage of the Dawn Treader, both occasions retrospectively) parallels the rise of Communist dictators, not least in Czechoslovakia.

12:29 What you have spoken of, Miraz is not omnipotent, just the biggest bully, in his own system.

He also is not aware of all that is going on, or he wouldn't have hired first that nanny and then Doctor Cornelius.

13:27 The religious history of Dune is about as unbelievable as that of Foundation after Hari Seldon dies, not to mention the inherent and obvious impossibility of Hari Seldon's psycho-statistics.

I quit Foundation after some paragraphs after Hari Seldon's death, since Mr. Asimov was basically naive enough to believe he had provided a model for the rise of Christianity.

But in the previous scenes, an alternative and not impossible reading of what happens is, Hari Seldon actually foresaw nothing, he just conveniently stated things like "oh, it was a 95 % chance of this arrest happening right now" in order to give his younger companion a sense of Hari Seldon having it all fixed.

13:43 Political entities in Narnia from death of Caspian IX to death of Caspian X involve:

  • a Telmarine coloniser culture
  • a colonised culture threatened with genocide
  • an usurper within the coloniser culture
  • a threat to the rightful heir coinciding with the genocidal threat
  • overseas possessions left to themselves
  • mercantile cities and shephard landscapes in the overseas possessions
  • loyalists who were faithful to Caspian IX and who were dealt with by Miraz in various ways
  • a secret presence of Old Narnians that could pass for Telmarines but weren't or weren't quite, making a liaison between the rightful heir and the colonised
  • lots of militaries with their own ambitions (like the ones who bungle the drowning of Trumpkin or like Glozelle and Sopespian)
  • threats from the North, giants and an evil witch who lives underground part of the time


I would say, for a children's story, duly taking into account that Prince Caspian, Voyage of the Dawn Treader and The Silver Chair are supposed to not be too confusing to an audience of nine, C. S. L. quite does rival GRRM and FH.

16:09 You have just done a good job of literarily justifying Nikabrik.

18:10 In CSL, as in Tolkien, Capitalism and Merchant Republics are not inherently good.

Check Governor Gumpas or Laketown for reference.

30:19 You have just given a great justification for the transitions between the books in the Narnia series.

King Frank's dynasty does not last beyond the tree of protection.
The Pevensies involve Narnia being ruled by people with some immaturity, like Queen Susan displays with the Calormene suitor.
Caspian X involves a man with more than just trace amounts of Telmarine greed, as VDD shows.
And his companions end up with a despondency about searching for the lost prince such that only a very secretive faction is able to forward Eustace and Jill. The ensuing development of the monarchy involves an appeasement with Calormen that ends up backfiring big time.

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Answering Ekpunobi (Red Head vs Founding Fathers)


Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Answering Ekpunobi (Red Head vs Founding Fathers) · New blog on the kid: All Borders Aren't Equal and Other Considerations

she, her = the redhead that Amala Ekpunobi is talking about (also "the redhead")
you = Amala Ekpunobi, I'm commenting under her video.
everyone else = named


The Founding Fathers Were Dumber Than A Modern 12-Year Old?
Amala Ekpunobi | recent?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XJXYjq89Xg


0:30 You are talking apples and oranges.

She was not saying "smarter" but "more access to information" ... two different things.

1:45 Correcting her, lobotomy was NOT a thing of the Founding Fathers era.

It only came with further progress in the 20th C. There is a reason why "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" is not a 19th or 18th C work of theatre.

3:45 Thank you very much for noting some things that some try to put down with police force are first amendment rights.

Nearly dito for shaming, though the shaming would also be a first amendment right.

4:15 We do not have IQ 100, because we have sunk from 160 to 100. He had (if so) 160 because he was an exceptional man (and that's why he was chosen to do his job or was able to take it on himself).

Medium IQ is defined as 100. It's an inherent feature of the system.

Btw, Plato, Shakespear, Greek, Latin, it's not a question of IQ, it's a question of cultural outlook.

For the record, it's also not a question of information as the redhead understands it, it's still a question of cultural outlook. Not of individuals, but of the whole society.

The redhead (I missed her name) belongs to another cultural outlook. Where knowing "we descend from Tiktaalik" or "Earth circles the Sun each year and itself each day" and "the universe is 13 + billion years old" is supposed to be not just true (I disagree on all points mentioned) but also more important as an outlook than Shakespear or Plato. Or Thomas Aquinas. I heartily disagree with her cultural outlook, but information as she understands it (the sum of verified factual statements about the world we live in, according to her standards of verification, those of Dawkins, basically) is more readily available now than in the day of the Founding Fathers.

She might have to ponder that the disagreements about what to do are not always disagreements about fact, but disagreements about which of the facts are more relevant to act on, and on what principles. I'm afraid that was not part and parcel of the informations she accessed as a twelve year old.

4:15 bis Auron McIntyre has a point about chronological snobbery, except in her case it's not just that. In her case, it's first and foremost a preference for Scientific Civilisation over Classic Civilisation, as C. P. Snow understood the words.

For the record, of the authors he enumerates, Cicero and to a lesser degree Locke were not CSL's favourites, though he relished what Locke had to say on society, and Plutarch is not really harder to read than Reader's Digest. He basically invented Reader's Digest.

4:52 They were professionally active in their teen years, fine, so was Justin Bieber and so was Brett Cooper. "Agonising" is overdoing the pity over professionally active teens.

5:28 Schools back then were not mooching on the idea that teens are immature and need to get LOTS of education before they can do anything.

Btw, Greta Thunberg was 17 going on 18 when, for one day, 6 Dec. 2020, she was editor in chief of Dagens Nyheter.

Weren't you chiming in with Jordan Peterson about teens not needing anything except EDUCATION that other day?

5:33 I started learning Latin as a teenager. Because lessons were not available in prepuberty childhood. To Jefferson they were, fortunately.

C. S. Lewis started learning Homer at age 16, he already had a founding in Ancient Greek before that.

Kirkpatrick: here is Iliad Alpha, read!

C. S. L: Menin aeide thea, Peleiadeos Achileos ...

5:47 St. Thomas Aquinas had a training in Trivium AND in Quadrivium.

The latter part being sth closer to the "information" (of scientific type) that the readhead was going on about.

Education was not just dumbed down from Founding Fathers to our day in the Trivium area, it was also dumbed down from Scholastics to Founding Fathers in the Quadrivium area. Meanwhile, Quadrivial things have actually got a boost since the Founding Fathers and were indispensable for the surveyor's licence as well.

6:26 The right to carry arms, second amendment, she had a point about what kind of arms it referred to.

Swords, yes. Pistols, but not revolvers. Rifles, but frontloaders, which had to be reloaded between each two single bullets shot.

By the way, ICE and the marines are lucky in LA that the leftists they are facing are no fans of the Second Amendment. If they were, perhaps the Boston Teaparty vibes would not just be cosplaying by now.

6:58 Burning at the stake was more of a hasard a century before the founding fathers. Lobotomy was not yet so.

Hope lobotomy remains a bad memory.

7:22 Their obsession was partly due to a Whig bias.

And it was partly selective. It was Tories, less concerned with Constitutional Freedoms, who were more concerned with individual freedom as against slavery.

George III = moderately anti-slavery (and that may have been part of the reason for Founding Fathers to oppose him). Yes, even in practise.
George Washington = theoretically anti-slavery, but really not just for now, directly ...

8:47 I'm also one who was at age ten not an eager letter writer.

However, he had learned more rhetoric than I and could elaborate more on the point.

9:21 Ah, they believed in homeschooling. Good.

9:43 At age 25 I could definitely not imagine myself writing letters for his advice on studies, I was doing mine.

My sentences are long, as his are, but part of the thing about the letter, which makes it seem advanced, is, word choices and phrases were different back then, what was a perfectly everyday word to John Quincy Adams (like "vexd" = "vexed") would be very "recherché" to most US readers today. In French "vexé" is still everyday, and this reminds me of one reason why English was NOT made the official language by the Founding Fathers, they are mixed with French culture, having just defeated France in the Seven Years War and therefore ruling some territories where French was not yet dead. Plus, more pertinently, they were Gentlement with French culture.

Friday, June 20, 2025

If Demons Go, Will Protesters or ICE Lose Energy?


Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: If Demons Go, Will Protesters or ICE Lose Energy? · New blog on the kid: I Only Learned of the Star Spangled Story from "El pendón estrellado"

The Catholic Take on the Anti-Ice Protest
FULL SHEEN AHEAD | 16 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMG0o1QAswo


6:26 Securing the borders is one thing.

If US and Mexico unite, the South border will be between half and a third of what it is now.

But ICE is acting within the borders, and in manners at least in some places not correct, as when a naturalisation ceremoney was interrupted by ICE for a forgotten document no one reminded the guy years ago.

Combat demons, but I'm far from sure it's the protest that has to cease, it could be the ICE.

139 guys and girls that were all bad guys?

I think you have heard news that is both bad and garbled.

NYP says: "Tom Homan says 139K deported since Trump took office"

139 k = 139 000. No way this could be verified all of them were bad guys.

For LA, on google, I couldn't find 139 without that K.

// Immigrant advocacy groups say they have information that more than 200 people were detained and that many do not have criminal records. // (Guardian)
// Overall, from Jan. 1 through May, ICE has made 685 deportation stops to more than 30 international destinations // (LA Times)
// 'Abducted by Ice': the haunting missing-person posters ... The handmade posters of immigrants have become a symbol of quiet resistance. Their creators reveal the story behind the project. // (Guardian)


Wait, I actually DO find 139.

139 aliens from Sept. 21 to Sept. 25, ICE says the arrests are part of ongoing enforcement actions targeting immigration violators and those who pose a threat


But the thing is, the news source says this about date and place:

ICE arrests 139 people across Florida, including Palm Beach and St. Lucie counties


So, LA is not Florida.

26 Sept. 2019


2019 is not 2025.

6:26 bis Tom Homan's comment from NY Post was April 28. Since Trump took office, since 20 Jan.

99 calendar days, 69 business days.

139 000 = 2014 per business day, up to late April and that's not yet counting May and start of June.

Could that rhythm be conducive to making more than just a few mistakes? I think so.

I also think, LA being near the South border bears more of the brunt than NYC and being more peopled bears more of the brunt than Arizona.




Does ICE have a fetish for the number 139?

Archived: ICE releases fiscal year 2023 annual report

29 Dec. 2023 — Removals also included 3,406 known or suspected gang members, 139 known or suspected terrorists, seven human rights violators, and 108 foreign fugitives wanted by their governments for crimes including homicide, rape, terrorism and kidnapping.


Same report:

ICE ERO’s 142,580 removals and 62,545 Title 42 expulsions to more than 170 countries worldwide in Fiscal Year 2023


142,580 + 62,545 = 205,125 deportations in 249 business days. = 824 deportations per business day. 2014 / 824 = 2.444 times quicker under Trump than under Biden, and it's already hurting.




9:23 First, you are inconsistent.

The people sent back can't both be the guys who would pressure the government if in Méjico and also "just the felons" ...

Second, if you want a defensible border (immigration wise, not military wise), union with Mexico which has a narrower South border would be a thing. But that obviously means, you can't send people back to Mexico any more, since Chiapas would be the same union as Alaska and Yucatán the same one as Maine. You would also not be in a position to argue against singing El pendón estrellado.

Third, you may be misassessing the realistic possibilities of good Mexicans to get rid of Freemason governments, after all, the US spent some decades of the 19th and early 20th CC. (support of Benito Juarez, perhaps Pancho Villa) making it hard for governments to be stable. Flirting with US Freemasonry became an option.




The final moments were an actual plea for the arrivals from Mexico, or at least many of them. Not overtly, but implicitly.

Making Up for Omissions


Questions for the Rector | Ep. 35: The Carlson/Cruz Interview: Must Christians Support Israel?
MHT Seminary | 19.VI.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbmi30yGG7s


Thank you, Your Excellency, good reminder, if with some omissions.

I suppose "the soul of wit is brevity" has sth to do with it.

8:49 In fact, three kings did rule over Israel, spoken of as such. Saul, David and Solomon.

After that, Judah was the South Kingdom, while the North Kingdom was actually also called Israel.

And, sending messengers to Achab king of Israel into the city,
[3 Kings (1 Kings) 20:2]


A type of the apostasy to come, right?

10:50 Indeed, they have as of late shown a very great enthusiasm in every excuse they can find for exonerating the state of Netanyahu from having behaved very badly against Gazawis.

Including by trying to make the Madleen all about my countrywoman Greta Thunberg (I'm a Swede too) and doing every twisted move they can to make her look silly — at least I mean if we count Dave Rubin, people with Jewish religion might have calmed down by now, but they seem to enjoy proxies like that.

13:18 I noticed an omission.

Part of the Jews (Acts 2) and part of the Samaritans (Acts 8) did accept the true Messiah.

Their descendants are still around, they are called Christian Palestinians.

As to Muslim Palestinians, they descend in part from Mitsrahi Jews, in part from Christian Palestinians.

This wasn't cleared up. But deserves to be, both for the question in the title, and because it answer an objection raised by some of the Jewish religion, like the sermon spoken by Rabbi Rivon Krygier in Notre-Dame.

Are Dave Rubin and Russel Brand Children (Matthew 11:16—19)?


Russell Brand Stunned by Dave Rubin’s Brutally Honest Answer About Greta Thunberg’s Motives
The Rubin Report | 19 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-Gzoh_EjKg


3:32 You are missing that Cairo is now blocking the road to Rafah. People trying to get aid across are being beaten up. We are not 1997 any more.

Cairo and Jerusalem are partners in holding Gazawis to only the calories Israel will provide, and no private humanitarianism allowed anymore than UNWRA.

And counting the calories someone else is allowed to have, reminds me of certain camps.

Anyone read some kind of scenario somewhere in the Apocalypse where Jerusalem is spiritually sth very different from Zion, namely "Sodom and Egypt"? Yes, chapter 11 verse 8.

It so happens, I would not want to have some of the people in Israel to be among the 7000 that share the fate of Core.

4:05 Thanks to her, people are talking of the Soumoud Caravan, and that means they are talking about Egypt.

Get with the news, Mr. Rubin.

And speaking of them, it is in them that Knesset actually asked Egypt to block humanitarian aid to Gaza.

Oh, wait, you were perhaps just forgetful:

Protesters Hold Woke Protest in Egypt, It Didn’t End Well
The Rubin Report | 16 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc-D2XMpbjM


The only way you can twist this into not being in moral favour of Thunberg or Gazawis is, you pretend Egypt and Gazawis come under one single label as "Islam" (never mind that Netanyahu likes the Islamist in power better than some of his predecessors, which makes Netanyahu anti-Christian by proxy, like he is by IDF in Gaza, never mind that Gazawis include Christians).

4:23 One prolonged kidnapping doesn't mean another short kidnapping isn't a kidnapping.

She was by legal definition kidnapped, as long as she didn't consent, given that:
  • she was in international waters, where Israelis have no jurisdiction to make a legal arrest;
  • even is she had been where Israelis had a legal possibility for a blockade, it doesn't cover blockading humanitarian aid, so would even in Gaza territorial waters still have been kidnapping.


If your daughter is raped but not hurt as in wounded, will you tell her to shut up because some others are bleeding nearly to death after a rape? No.

Worse items of same crime doesn't mean the crime isn't a crime also in a less bad acting out.

5:22 Thanks for showing the map.

Madleen was taken North of Sinai's limit to fully African Egypt. Check the Madleen tracker.

And thanks for speaking up against Egypt, which is now Israel's partner in crime against Gazawis.

I guess your point was, the relatively lesser risk of mistreatment in case of kidnapping (Israelis didn't beat her, as Egypt did with food truckers and Rafah protesters) means she was not sincere, since obviously the only measure of sincerity is maximising the cost for oneself? Anything less than maximal cost makes one a grifter, right?





5:36 They might want to destroy an apartheid state that drove them away from their ancestral homes. Yasser Arafat, a few generations older than most Gazawis by now, had one grandparent from Cairo, where he was born himself, one from Gaza City and two from Jerusalem. The Sinai is empty for a reason, it's not fertile. And Israel is not likely to sacrifice even more of Jordan and lake Genesareth to make another desert bloom. If Egypt does it, Egypt is likely to want it for Egyptians rather than Gazawis. Not sure if Bardawil Lake lends itself to the project, though.

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Can US Americans Protest?


New blog on the kid: ICE Is Not Doing the Right Thing · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Can US Americans Protest?

I suppose Maryland, Kentucky and Tennessee, good places as they are, are not the best places from which to assess the realities of LA or of California.


Dodgers Match Opens with a National Anthem in SPANISH?!
Matt Walsh | 17 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN7f2P4YMDM


1:29 Platform for a protest .... in honour of English friends who like to nickname 4th of July "Traitor Day" ... wasn't there one in Boston, about some tea-leaves?

More seriously, ICE may right now be pushing California out of the Union. Because ICE is in LA violating states rights.

3:43 It was inconceivable to her that a Star Spangled Banner commissioned by President Roosevelt could be off-limits in a state with one of the highest number of Spanish speakers, most of whom are US Citizens, simply never gave up Spanish in some cases (you are aware that "los angeles" is Spanish for "the angels", I hope).

But you had to twist that into her being the kind of person who's never heard a no in her life.

4:25 Oh, even if LA is actually welcoming these foreigners and taking ICE as the actual invader?

It's still reprehensible for her to stand up for States rights and the rights of her city?

7:10 Nezza is not a legal or illegal immigrant. She's born of two immigrants, but of an ethnicity well represented where they came. An ethnicity which arrived there before certain gold diggers of English language.

For how many generations do you propose that immigrants and their citizen descendants are good for hard work and nothing that smacks of entitlement?

I thought the whole point of the application process was so one could be legally entitled to things. Like residing or doing things citizens do, depending on what the application process was for.

8:14 You are completely out of touch with the case you are commenting on.

Vanessa Hernandez' parents are middle class. You don't become middle class by not respecting the laws of the country you are in.

And as to LA, citing the general case for Trump's policy, that's pretty inflammatory after Alex Padilla, a US Senator, was handcuffed.

[I didn't mention:]

Reporter shot with rubber bullet in LA: The FULL story | Lauren Tomasi interview | Today Show
TODAY | 13 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOoeZFR9DY4


Australian reporter shot in LA riots video holds sinister detail
news.com.au | 10 JUne 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBQyeM-JpqQ


A MAGA member asked me why I turned off the biometrics on my phone ...
Parkrose Permaculture | 17 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcKbAR3nNO8


I am happy I have no such phone.

Look at what CELLPHONE spells out in ASCII. What cops are doing is probably part of why this kind of phones are a bad idea in the end.

3:38 Yeah, someone actually does remember those leaves of Camellia sinensis that touched the wrong type of water to get a drinkable beverage in Boston.

I just saw someone who thought using El pendón estrellado as a protest was so disgusting, a desecration of what America (to him) stands for ....

Charlie Kirk praises Israel for the values of Kamala Harris and the incompetence of the IDF


If Israel Laid Down Their Weapons, What Would Happen?
Charlie Kirk | 10 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_VAoT3JR_0


Israel had a PM named Golda Meir.

My grandparents met her before I was around, and perhaps even before ma was around.

I'm 56. Grandpa was 68 when I was born.

In fact, she was probably not PM yet, that was a few years when I was a small child. She had other posts previously, though.

Is your point that US would have been a better place for women to live in with Hillary Clinton or with Kamala Harris as President?

Even if so, that better country was decades ago.

2:57 "what exactly is Islam doing then"

Well, Muslims certainly acted something similar to Settlers back in the days of Omar. Or of Saladin and Baybars.

That was pretty much even longer ago than Golda Meir was PM.

3:43 Yes, the IDF was so kind to Christians about protecting them from internal quarrels, that the IDF preferred to do the quarrelling themselves.

4:54 October 7 was a genocidal type of terror act, but not a carried out genocide.

Blockades of food since 2009, that's a consistent policy of a prolonged genocidal act.

Gazawis are allowed the food Israel supplies, some times also what UNWRA supplies, but that has stopped. UNWRA is obliged to cooperate with Hamas, because that's civil authorities. If the US needed UNO relief tomorrow, the UNO relief organisations would be obliged to cooperate with Trump, even if there are people in those circles who wouldn't like that. Israelis claim that UNWRA relief has been hijacked, Hamas is controlling it and selling it for weapons.

Meanwhile, whatever cash Gaza has had, the flow of actual food has consistently been too slow, and foreign private initiatives like the Freedom Flotilla or the Soumoud caravan which would not have been needing to collaborate closely with Hamas, have been stopped from giving relief, well before October 7. Starving people is part of why certain camps were considered as genocidal. The parents of Dita Krauss didn't die in gas chambers. Her father died in typhoid, and her mother after getting out, because she had been starved and wasn't used to eating normally. Are you telling her, her mother was not a victim of Nazi crimes?

5:11 I was actually going to concede that things like the attack on the Kfar Aza kibbutz were genocidal.

Let's check. In Kfar Aza, 80 Israelis died. If you like, you can say 80/950 or 80/700 is more proportionally than 55 720 on 2 000 000.

But if Kfar Aza was emptied, it was emptied by IDF, not Hamas. IDF is also trying to empty Gaza.

5:28 The Israeli government was warned.

They didn't act. There was a peace process going on. October 7 disrupted it. And the Israeli government seems to be fine with that.

5:41 Orally, she's not all that well prepared to show evidence, but here is an article of the New York Times:

Israel Knew Hamas’s Attack Plan More Than a Year Ago
By Ronen Bergman and Adam Goldman Reporting from Tel Aviv Published Nov. 30, 2023 Updated Dec. 2, 2023
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/30/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-attack-intelligence.html


A blueprint reviewed by The Times laid out the attack in detail. Israeli officials dismissed it as aspirational and ignored specific warnings.


What is your evidence that Bergman and Goldman would lie about their government?

[tried to add:]

To be fair, the article as such says, the Israeli militaries were simply incompetently underestimating Hamas.

5:45 "the worst killing of Jews since" well, 1945.

So much for the idea that Israel is the haven for Jewish safety.

6:09 The evidence to anything except her claim is that the IDF was incompetent.

6:36 Yeah, right. The day after Tsukkot and on a Shabbat, the Israeli Defense Force is not able to respond ...

And they determined in that day, saying: Whosoever shall come up against us to fight on the sabbath day, we will fight against him: and we will not all die, as our brethren that were slain in the secret places
[1 Machabees 2:41]

The IDF has actually shown more skill on the occasion known as Yom Kippur war, right?

11:28 You are aware that one of the matches between Israel and the West is: Israel is OK with gay marriage (Israelis can marry online "in Utah" while remaining in Israel), and with abortion (Women who get pregnant while serving in the IDF are entitled to free, state-funded abortion, while abortions need a medical committee, this one nearly always approves).

In other words, what lines Israel up with "the West" is what you and I want to get the West away from in part.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Ignorant Palestinian Woman Mocked by Zionist, But the Joke is On Him, Not Her


“Palestinian” FREAKS Over DNA Test Showing Palestinians Don’t Actually Exist!
Tal Oran - TheTravelingClatt | 16 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0O0J7x-r24


DNA tests for Lebanese Jordanian = heritage of the Greater Israel that Jesus founded as a by-product of the Church 2000 years ago.

If she thought she was "100 % Arab" she never learned the distinction between Arab and Mustariba.

Palestinians, like Jordanians and Lebanese are not "Arab" in the sense of the distinction, but "Mustariba." It means they are a different people that became Arabised.

Jordanians = Edom, Moab, Ammon. Lebanon = Canaan. And Palestinians? Well, Israelites, obviously.

Monday, June 16, 2025

Prophecies Already Fulfilled


No More OT Sacrifice · Prophecies Already Fulfilled

Rabbi CONFRONTS His Faith in Jesus - Results Are Shocking | Rich's Testimony
SO BE IT! | 24 March 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZkwmuStuRE


9:32 Lion and lamb.

Take St. Severine of Noricum as a lamb.

Take Odoacar as a lion.

They had a nice chat, and the result was that the Roman élite of Noricum was evacuated to Naples. That's why the biography of St. Severine (who stayed in Noricum, died in modern Mautern, near Krems, in Austria) was written by one Eugippius, who wrote in a monastery in Naples. Eugippius was part of the evacuees, of course.

Or take St. Clotilda as a lamb, and Clovis as a lion, they literally lay down in the same bed. They had five children (surviving).

9:32 "world peace"

There is no actual prophecy about world peace. (1)

Tovia Singer gave a break-down about the ones so interpreted, and mainly two categories.

1) No wars between Judah and Ephraim - fulfilled in the Palestinians;
2) The word of peace shall go out to the Gentiles - but doesn't say they will be obeying.

10:34 Jesus is the triumphant Messiah already from the Resurrection, indeed from His descent into Hades.

(1) In the ones Tovia Singer talked about.

Saturday, June 14, 2025

People Who Take Nimrod's Oppressive City for Noah's Altar, Have a Spiritual Problem


"This is Way Worse Than I Thought"... | Göbekli Tepe Prophecy
Off The Kirb Ministries | 14 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEPtDZ9hIX4


9:13 Pounding stones were used to create a contemporary moa on Easter Island, before the eyes of Thor Heyerdahl

10:17 There was certainly ONE man who "began to be a giant" or "began to be mighty" at Göbekli Tepe.

For more details, see Genesis 10 and Genesis 11.

10:26 I most certainly DO deny they were ante-diluvians.

Nimrod made a relatively clumsy attempt at regaining pre-Flood technology. He was decent in astronomy and trigonometry, though.

Carbon date 9500 BC = real date 2607 BC, death of Noah
Carbon date 8500 or 8000 BC = real date 2556 BC, birth of Peleg

Carbon date of 2957 BC (year of the Flood)? 39 000 BP / 37 000 BC.

10:31 Stone henge is, most parts, younger than Genesis 14.

There was some ground laying of a circle in "8000 BC" (after Babel) and next level is "3200 BC" in carbon dates, while Genesis 14 goes back all the way to "3500 BC" in carbon dates.

11:53 "and then it was buried"

= and they ceased to build the city (Genesis 11).

Leaders, like but not limited to Nimrod, didn't want to even see the place where communication broke down between the work teams.

17:31 Against his theory:

1) you find unclean animals and unclean birds priorised in GT
2) and you find depictions of decapitated people with vultures on the shoulders that look like Polynesian birdmen.

It's an insult to Noah.

In Göbekli Tepe you have also found perforated skulls, that were probably stringed on top of each other. Nimrod boasting his capacity for "punishment" ....

18:18 If Nimrod had roamed the earth as the mightiest of Palaeolithic hunters prior to GT, he certainly knew animals.

18:48 There is not much "South", there is SW by W from Ararat to GT.

"Removing from the East" as the correct translation says ....

19:35 What if Nimrod was trying to preserve his excuse for not trusting the promise of God?

If my carbon tables are correct, the Younger Dryas is a certainly post-Flood layer, and it involves a comet strike.

THE excuse Nimrod took to telling people "we can't trust the promise of God, we must make sure 'never again' that Flood" ...

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!


Josephus, Antiquities, Book I, Chapter 4, § 2
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2848/2848-h/2848-h.htm#link2HCH0004


20:32 Nimrod would have had a motive to look back at the Flood to drive home the point (if Josephus is correct) that God had already sent destruction and they needed to get higher up, by their own efforts.

The "handbags" are probably buckets. This is known from later Assyrian art and texts.

21:56 The one assumption I do change is a stable carbon 14 level of c. 100 pmC.

A carbon date two halflives ago would be 9435 BC, but the samples only go back that far if the sample started out with 100 pmC. Mainstream scientists would agree with me, that a thing dated to (better match) 8295 BC would have been, in 2565 BC, down to 50 pmC. And the difference is, I also think it was at 50 pmC in 2565 BC, I just think it was then that the sample started, i e the atmosphere was 50 pmC back then.

A relative stability of carbon 14 in the atmosphere is to be expected, since the atmosphere functions as a very big sample, and a century of constant flux between very high and very low carbon 14 levels would be more costly in radioactive origins of carbon 14 plus other events, than simply a few centuries of a fairly steady rise would be.

22:01 We do know that what was in the sample to begin with is likely to reflect what was in the atmosphere previously, with some delays.

For instance, grass will reflect what was in the atmosphere the last year. A tree what was in the atmosphere for c. 50 or 100 years. An animal living mainly on grass or cereals (including man) would reflect the atmosphere the last 7 years. By living on meat, one would increase that delay. By eating fish and shellfish, one would get some pretty old carbon, getting the carbon age to a few centuries before one lived.

So, it's not as if the original carbon content was "just anyone's guess" prior to decay starting, if one holds to Young Earth Creationism, as I do, one has to admit that the carbon 14 content rose relatively slowly in the armosphere, and this started after the Flood.

Hence, a carbon rise from 1.6 pmC to 100 pmC over 1778 years, from Flood to Fall of Troy, definitely is feasible. A constant wobble up and down isn't. Having a shorter time between Flood and Fall of Troy, like Ussher chronology instead of Roman Martyrology for Christmas Day ... just maybe. Or maybe not.

23:10 "4000 BC" for Ur is definitely NOT lining up with the Biblical timeline, unless you admit it's a carbon date that's off.

I have Abraham born in 2015 BC, as per Roman Martyrology saying so.

I have the carbon date "4000 BC" in the actual date 2020 BC, as per intercalations between end of Babel (birth of Peleg at youngest layer of Göbekli Tepe) and Genesis 14 (archaeology of En Geddi carbon dates, at the end, to "3500 BC"). For 2020 BC to carbon date as "4000 BC" we need to have had then a carbon 14 level in the atmosphere risen as high as 78.688 pmC, which is feasible, if you accept 51.766 pmC at the end of Babel and 82.763 pmC when Abraham was 80 years old, in Genesis 14 (actually, between 75 and 85, Ishmael born when he was 86, but 80 is a round medium value of his age in Genesis 14).

24:50 I would rather say that the vultures in Apocalypse 19 are God's REVENGE for the vultures that Nimrod, at Göbekli Tepe, used as terror like punishments.

Göbekli Tepe, vultures are used by a slave hunter to punish shirkers.

Apocalypse 19, God is reversing the set-up, punishing slave hunters.

26:05 Yes, exactly, and the Flood narrative like pictures on some pillars, as per the impression you shared, would fit the propaganda narrative of Nimrod.

Like Nimrod, some people are now reducing God's motive for the Flood to being a "genocidal maniac" (but with superhuman powers).

You may have noticed, some enemies of God have also spoken about the Flood.

And if you ask me to answer them, before the Flood, slavery was even more complete than at Göbekli Tepe.

26:19 And you may want to know where we see Noah's emphasis on animals?

On much more beautiful art, like Lascaux or Altamira. Where, along horses, along mammoths, the animals are often clean animals (an Aurochs has fully cloven hoofs and is a real ruminant).

27:14 Another nail in the coffin for Göbekli Tepe as God's altar, the stones at Göbekli Tepe are hewn stones. Quarried stones.

The stones for patriarchal altars were of un-hewn stones. Stones you simply pick up from the ground and make a roughly regular pile of, with a roughly flat top.

27:36 sqrt(1600) = 40.

28:09 God. I checked if "built" was an appropriate verb, Genesis 2:22 says it is.*

30:08 "not through being religious, not through doing rituals"

Sorry, but your individual soteriology is off. The sacraments would fall under what you call "rituals" and the way we approach them would fall under what you call "being religious" ...

And the Church preserves that, because Jesus gave that (Mt 26:26)

30:32 If you double-check John 3 as a chapter, Jesus is actually requiring us** to believe what He has chosen is good. He is requiring us to act it.

If that involves what you would call rituals, see verse 5, btw, why would I bother with your characterisation over Jesus' words?

* Ps. 138:5 prefers "formed" ... a few verses lower "made" ...
** Meaning, go to a Catholic Catechism and not to Joe Kirb's words, about how to get saved!

No More OT Sacrifice


No More OT Sacrifice · Prophecies Already Fulfilled

He Asked “WHERE'S THE SON in the Hebrew Bible?”… So I Showed Him | Street Interview
SO BE IT! | 14 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfSecZRnoO8


About Deicide.

We have all killed Jesus with our sins. However, rejecting Jesus was a major sin, and collective in those who chose to belong to the rejecting and not the rejected community (ancestral to Christian Palestinians, btw).

One can also refer to the guilt of killing Jesus by killing his members, like Saul once upon a time was participant in killing Stephen.

So, the Catholic theology in question is no disproof of Catholicism being real Christianity.

[on the OT sacrificial system, earlier in the video]

6:55 Speaking of which, the Green ex-Desert in Israel proves the Sacrificial System of the OT is past.

The deserts found in Judaea, in the Mandate, it was not because "Arabs" (Mustariba, really, and of Israelite root) neglected basic concepts that could have avoided desertification.

No, that desert was mentioned in the Mosaic law as well as in Matthew 4 and in Luke 4.

The Flowering Desert is at the cost of draining both Jordan and Kinnereth, but also the OT Sacrificial System.

Some People Thought Greta Thunberg Was Finished When Taken


They Wanted to Underline She Was Finished When Released.


Greta Thunberg suffers ‘one final embarrassment’ in deportation from Israel
Sky News Australia | 11 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU9blPzRxl4


0:46 For protecting and defending our homeland, said the captain?

Against a girl of 22 and against Gazawis able to eat, right?

Is that captain flirting with the idea to look like Nimrod Ben Kush, in manners and in gematria?

2:10 Have you heard of the Caravan Soomood?

Have you heard how truckloads of food were rejected on the Libyan and Egyptian border, on the request of Israel?

I think it begins to show that Netanyahu doesn't want the Gazawis too well fed.

And when that is being pointed out, he makes a preventive strike on Iran, which obviously shuts down the Tel Aviv Ben Gurion Air Port.

What an excuse for them to keep retaining your colleague in prison!

3:18 Customs?

Israel is not letting in food supplies for Gaza through customs either. As far as I can see, the Caravan Soomood is still detained and asked to turn at the Egyptian border, and people who came legally by plane were deported.

And speaking of customs, the crew of the Madleen had the passports in order.

Friday, June 13, 2025

The story is fictional, but the attitude I comment on is current in circles pretty typical for Trump or at least his admirers


Fictionality of story, see this part of the waver:

The stories on this channel are completely made up and meant just for fun.


Trump Stops Motorcade for a $5 Hug Sign—You Won’t Believe What Happens Next!
Stately Stories | 9 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1KIpd6KZbg


5:52 "Big Corporations? They're the one creating jobs."

A bakery like Harrys is certainly likely to hire more people than a bakery at the street corner in Paris. But

Pain de mie 100% Mie Harrys Nature petites tranches - 500g = 1,90 €Prix promotionnel 3,80 € / 1kg
Baguette - 250 g = 1:10 €, so, 4:40 € / 1kg

That extra 60 centimes per kilogramme (normally 40 centimes, 1,90 € being a promo) exists partly because the precincts take up more space for feeding 1000 people with baguettes than for feeding them with Harrys, but also it pays more people working to make them and more of them are their own business owners.

So, it's small business that create jobs better.

[Tried to add]

It can be added, street corner bakeries save in bread price by saving transport costs.

Also good from Greta Thunberg's classical perspective.

Attacks on Thunberg Ignorant and Stupid


And I'm sure these two are not the only ones from Sky News Australia, even on this recent issue. Given Australian carbon emissions, there are some incentives for Australians with a certain position to dislike her message.


‘Mockery’: Greta Thunberg's recent activist stunt is ‘acting’
Sky News Australia | 12 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOGpXoz8Sbk


2:29 Some people do walk with hands behind the back, and we don't know how much she was handcuffed before the release, but nevertheless, let's take the German case.

1) Police had the orders to remove and detain protesters.
2) They had no orders to stop posing once the protesters were removed.
3) There were no violent acts committed at the protest (unlike some in LA) that would have warranted security motivated restrictions on posing.
4) She was a media celebrity, so, why wouldn't they let her?

So, she was not pretending in the least. Stop spreading fake news about her!

3:02 By the way, if someone had asked her, and it wasn't a coincidence, I bet she would have answered "no, I'm not handcuffed, but maybe Thiago Ávila is, maybe Liam Cunningham is ..."

There were other detainees at the moment she could have named, glad Rima Hassan, Yasemin Acar and Şuayb Ordu are already safe, as well as the French Doctor who on arriving witnessed at length about harsh conditions in Israeli prison once the cameras were off.

[Şuayb is the Turkish spelling for approximately Shwibe]

‘Troubled girl’: Greta Thunberg again claims she was kidnapped by IDF
Sky News Australia | 12 juin 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPFE7wsdbD4


"They were detained, not kidnapped." (comment)

One and same physical action would be detainment if it happened in Israel's territorial waters, conceivably, but even then it would be for an illegal policy of blockade.

But if it happened on international waters, it's piracy and kidnapping.

"Kidnapping is a massive accusation. She was deported, get over it" (comment)

The deportation ended the kidnapping.

One which, according to testimony of fellow detainee Baptiste André, Dr. Med. involved sleep deprivation, a form of torture used by Communists on quite a few of their camps and prisons.

"She needs professional help" (Graham Richardson)

Used, as not unusually, as a cue for refusing justice to someone already victim of a crime.

What's the Israeli Perspective on June 13? Are Netanyahu and Katz lying to their people?


Iran Didn't Expect This | ISRAEL IRAN CONFLICT
SO BE IT! | 13 juin 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkEbzUtsE3E


[my questions, while I hear the video]

Wait, Iran attacked Israel before the Nuke on Iranian targets?

The June 2025 Iranian strikes against Israel occurred on the evening of 13 June 2025, following Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets under Operation Rising Lion.


[tried to add]

Around 3 am local time, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared a nationwide state of emergency, warning of an imminent missile and drone retaliation.[63] Warning sirens were activated across Israel in anticipation of a possible Iranian counterattack, though no ballistic missiles had been launched by Iran at the time of reporting.[47] Katz further described Israel's attack on Iran as a "preemptive strike".


God held the line 1:03 he's the one who kept the drones from 1:05 reaching their target

Drones aren't missiles and don't necessarily have targets. They may carry missiles and then have targets.

Was any drone even trying to shoot anything?

Because if not, Iran was just giving you the kind of harrassment that presumably Israel or Greece had been giving the Madleen about a week ago.

If Israel was harrassed but not hurt with drones and answered by a nuke attack on Iran, that was arguably overkill.

2:09 Wisdom and courage, pretty needed.

Palestinian civilians have been dying and a humanitarian aid mission has been kidnapped in international waters over some people like Israel Katz and his men showing cowardice and stupidity.

My fellow Swede Greta Thunberg was on board the Madleen, and she was in a prison where she was deprived of sleep. Three of her comrades are still held back.

2:09 bis And especially, if your government is lying to you, like 3AM fake alert.

[tried to add]

Warning sirens were activated across Israel in anticipation of a possible Iranian counterattack, though no ballistic missiles had been launched by Iran at the time of reporting.[47]


Sourced:

Israel launches preemptive strike on Iranian nuclear sites, military targets
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-857575


Where I find:

Dozens of Israeli aircraft participated in an initial wave of strikes on dozens of military targets and Iranian nuclear sites early on Friday morning.

Warning sirens have been set off to get the public ready for potential Iranian counterattacks of ballistic missiles on Israel.

Jerusalem Post did not give a statement that drones actually were coming, unless that's in Netanyahu's adress.

[I break off, as my comments keep disappearing]

On the Martyna Ogonowska Case


UK : 17 years in gaol for stabbing rapist
Sarah Cain | 27 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TYoStIDRJE


10:22 I have been targetted as an enemy of women for saying, if they are raped, they have no right to mete out death penalty on the rapist's child, which is also theirs, through abortion.

I've also said, if a woman getting raped killed in self defense, I'd not count that as a crime.

Seems the UK got that somewhat backwards.

Michael Hirst
@michaelhirst4191
But she wasn’t being raped. The story as told in this video is seriously wrong* both as to the facts and as to the law, as I and several others have explained in comments to it

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@hglundahl
@michaelhirst4191 For the last 11 days, I did not find your comments directly under the video, didn't check comments under other comments.

Do you have a blog post that collects your comments under the video?


* It seems to match this paragraph from The Guardian:

Sentencing her at Cambridge crown court in 2019, Judge Farrell QC told Ogonowska that Jaskiewicz “undoubtedly touched you sexually and was violent to you shortly before he was killed”. But he said it did not qualify as self-defence because Ogonowska, who he accepted suffered from some mental disability and had experienced previous trauma, had taken a knife to the scene.


UK woman loses jail term appeal after killing man as he sexually assaulted her
Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent | Fri 9 May 2025 17.56 CEST
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/09/uk-woman-loses-jail-term-appeal-after-killing-man-as-he-sexually-assaulted-her

Thursday, June 12, 2025

Travelling Clatt Eager to Shut Me Down, Or Is It the Cyber?


Melanie Philips Makes Host SPEECHLESS With Proof Israel Belongs To The Jews
Tal Oran - TheTravelingClatt | 12 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv8c_9TLcgk


1:32 Let's distinguish "people" and "religion" shall we.

King David was a close to First Temple Jew, a pre-First Temple Jew. Jesus was a Second Temple Jew. The religious connection between these two versions of Judaism are pretty uncontroversial OT history.

None of them was a Rabbinic Jew any more than a Catholic Christian or a Muslim.

However Rabbinic Mitsrahi Jews, some Catholics, Orthodox, Copts and Armenians in Judaea, Samaria and Gaza, and some Muslims roughly same places are the purest descendants of the people who had Israel as a kingdom, Muslim Palestinians ranking last and some Druz actually in the middle of that. You know that genetic test that was later censored as Antisemitic.

So, as a people, as a physical population with physical ancestry, the Muslim Palestinian actually has more of a connection to the Kingdom of David than the Ashkenazi Jew typically has.

I once very candidly asked "was sind Juden" and got the answer "Juden sind ein Volk" ... in that sense Palestinians are Jews, like the Mitsrahi.

But if you shift and say "Jews are a religious community" and refer to Rabbinic Jews, you have suddenly ceased to talk about the Kingdom of David. Those guys rejected Jesus after they had become as stateless as Palestinians were before WW-I.

[Tried to add]

I speak of Robin McKie, Sun 25 Nov 2001, The Guardian, Journal axes gene research on Jews and Palestinians.

Cited in Zionism: The Secret Evidence Israel Tried to Bury, a video by Rational Religion from 3 Dec 2023

Zionism: The Secret Evidence Israel Tried to Bury
Rational Religion | 3 Dec. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBf8SeE3OAA


[I forgot to mention Samarians, but also highly related to Ancient Israelites.]

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Seven Hills


The ANTICHRIST Isn't Who You THINK
THE BEAT by Allen Parr | 27 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v16DvnB2Pdc


4:52 I think you are doing eisegesis.

Marvel at doesn't necessarily mean consider someone as a good person.

Believing he has genial solutions doesn't necessarily enter into a very totalitarian obedience.

Considering someone invincible as a warrior doesn't necessarily mean he'll use the sword just or mainly for good.

10:03 The US was in many places, including Upstate New York, wilderness in the time of St. John.

Do you get the hint? The Dimond brothers have even noted that a river feature in that prophecy matches the landscape of their monastery.

Well, there are at least two more places identified in the Americas. Apoc. 7 features the four corners of the earth in a setting where they basically have to be places.

The four corners include Cape Horn in the SW and some place in Alaska (probably Point Barrow) as the NW corner.

11:45 Two things.

The Antichrist himself is considered as someone invincible at some point.

And America was colonised by only from-Rome countries. Plus Ireland, which was earlier colonised by one of them.

England, Wales, parts of Scotland are all Roman, France, Spain Portugal.

12:44 And it so happens, Rome as in Daniel is described as the Republic.

Washington DC and the Constitution were modelled on the Roman Republic.

14:34 Rome had an imitation somewhere:

Washington, D.C. – Built on Capitol Hill, Meridian Hill, Floral Hills, Forest Hills, Hillbrook, Hillcrest, and Knox Hill

15:38 I can confirm for these three, I checked the gematria. In ASCII.

[Barrack Obama, Trump, Musk]

16:00 No, you are wrong.

Christians very definitely will be here to the second coming to Doomsday. Matthew 28:20.

We will be here to identify him.

16:30 And the Catholic position is, the Church will be around to the end of the 3 1/2 years.

17:45 Have you studied political history for the time since the Endarkenment?

18:06 Germany 100 years ago was by and large an un-Christian society especially among the Evangelische.

Liberal theology, Marcan priority, "later accretions" in the Bible ...

19:20 Steps out of the way.

1918, the last West Roman Emperor stepped out of the way. And yes, the Emperor as a personal dignitary is one identification of "the one who is holding back" ... I think it's correct and that Lenin was already the lawless one.

Charles as West Roman Emperor, Nicholas as East Roman, enter Republics which mime the Roman Republic, a k a the Fourth Beast ...

19:50 The Church is "he ekklesia" and why should she be either "ho katekhon" or "to katekhon"?

"he ekklesia" would rather be "he katekhousa"

Those Critics Are Missing a Distinction


How You Can Tell Greta Thunberg's Protests Are Staged | Body Language Mysteries
The Body Language Guy | 18 Jan. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWQr9jmaE8Q


0:29 Compliments on your pronunciation of Lützerath.

2:25 I think you are confusing "confrontations" as in riots with "peaceful protests" as in Thunberg's speciality.

I think the German police, already not too popular over displacing a village (let's be fair, Franco wasn't always the best, there was this embalse de Jaca* which took displacing a village, but in the German case I think it was even dissolved), didn't want to get into even more mediatic trouble by being awkward to non-interfering media.

They didn't exactly have to get anyone out of the way, given there was no violence, except on their side and a purely administrational need to get people away.

And if anyone noted her smile while kidnapped, it could be noted that smiling occasions like this one is what she's used to.

3:03 No, their job was not exactly to "neutralise this protest" but only to get the protesters away.

It wasn't a riot, it was more like tree huggers, except in this case it was village huggers.

Your comment says more of a cultural absence in your own country than of some weird twist in the Thunberg story that Germans or Swedes missed.

[Tried to add]

Or, perhaps I should say in your part of the US.

3:14 "perpetually angry" ... do you get that from perpetually rewatching an angry clip of hers?

She obviously isn't.

3:32 Have you heard the expression "passive resistance"?

Your "no resistance" means walking when told to.

The only alternative isn't fighting, there is also such a thing as passive resistance. Like refusing to fight but also refusing to walk.

I'm not sure it could work in all situations, but for some kinds of things, it may have an impact on decisions, and certainly has an impact of impressing people.

4:04 Their orders were to remove the protesters, not to obstruct documentation.

* I keep calling Embalse de Yesa Embalse de Jaca (Embalse means dam). It's 55 km from Jaca.

Answering Two Protestants


Three Things Catholics need to stop saying
Gospel Simplicity | 11 juin 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kexgWz7UgyI


3:18 Yes and the Anglo-Catholics of the Oxford movement were in fact denying themselves the descriptor Protestants.

An Evangelical "Protestant" cannot take credit for the honesty of an Anglo-Catholic "Protestant" ... it's like if a Commie took credit for the work of Jimmy Carter, because Jimmy Carter, as a Democrat, could also be labelled a "Leftist"

I happen to know the Oxford Movement because John Henry Newman described it with affection after leaving it for Catholicism. Apologia pro vita sua.

3:41 Not really, if what those "Protestants" who originally translated were finding Apostolic Succession, priests submitting to their bishop, Real Presence in the Eucharist in the Fathers.

Which the Oxford movement certainly did find in them.

Not exactly what Lizzy Reezay would have considered as Protestant back at Pepperdine!

9:14 I basically never say "that's your interpretation" without following up by giving a better one.

I think some Protestants have given me less courtesy, for instance when I state that

Genesis 3:15, Judges 5 (forgot the verse), Luke 1:28, 1:31, 1:42 between them prove Our Lady defeated Satan and prior to becoming Mother of God, while a verse in 1 John seems to prove She could not possibly have done so other than by being sinless.

11:28 I usually don't argue from infallibility for a Catholic claim against a Protestant.

I argue for infallibility a lot, but either the general thing, or that the Bible interpretation leaves a reasonable spectrum, and infallibility settles the exact point.

However, that there is an infallible Church is not disputable in reasonable Bible interpretation. Interpreting certain passages as not meaning that is about as candid as chosing the solution of an equation with imaginary numbers instead of a very simple one in natural integers.

12:48 "we cannot really know what it means this side of eternity"

Like God put it into the Bible so that no one could really understand it?

@AllieBethStuckey
Why am I not Catholic?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4lOCGSStgk4


"by grace alone, through faith alone"

Do you find that in the Bible?

Anti-Industrialism Is Not Catharism


Q: Why was J.R.R. Tolkien against industrialization?
https://www.quora.com/Why-was-J-R-R-Tolkien-against-industrialization/answer/Hans-Georg-Lundahl-2


Hans-Georg Lundahl
Studied Latin (language) at Lund University
Jun 2nd, 2025
Take a look at the video How One Company Secretly Poisoned The Planet[1] — or take a look at a car accident.

Cars had been one of the products of industrialism Tolkien enjoyed most in his youth. Then he thought about it, and one thing that came to his mind was a hit and run ending in a death in Paris, which he had witnessed. It also hit him how much land was sacrificed to parking places and to roads in asphalt.

Back then, there was lead in car fuel. So, every mile ridden in a car contributed to poison the air somewhat. Fortunately, this is now forbidden.

His friend C. S. Lewis never used zips. For trousers, he had buttoned ones, because a button can be sewn back to its place fairly easily by hand. Sewing a whole new zipper is wastful, since the whole thing is discarded for just one tooth out of place, and hard unless you know how to sew them on by sewing machines. Which CSL didn’t, and, though I’ve seen it done, I don’t know either.

Canned food is obviously less pleasant than freshly cooked, unless you are good at seasoning. Farmers in a pre-industrial society tend to be majority population and well off and easy going compared to farmers in an industrial society, indebted, menaced if small, always in a hurry to make ends meet.

So, if you like farmers to be many and happy, if you prefer no car hits and (back then) no lead in the atmosphere, if you prefer buttons over zips, cooking from raw ingredients over cans, what would make you love industrialism?

Footnotes

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC2eSujzrUY

My Excuses to Miss Thunberg for Temporarily Taking Her for a Gothenburger


My own most maritime relatives are Gothenburgers, and seeing her obvious prowess with boats, I forgot where the School Strike began. My bad.


"Comment Greta est arrivée ici" [title, fortunately not video, automatically translated to French, and sorry, but I forgot the exact idiomatic Englisn phrase]
Jordan B Peterson Clips | 10 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXabYcz_LGA


0:28 Already, you are basically saying her position is due to some kind of fringe parents, the position on carbon emissions that is.

In Sweden, it's arguably opposition to that narrative that's likely to come from fringe parents.

Plus the idea that if a fringe parent succeeds in transmitting the values to her progeny, it's by being very domineering.

That's idiocy too, but totally irrelevant for Miss Thunberg. She heard the climate apocalypticism from very mainstream science in a very mainstreal school, which was so mainstream it conducted some kind of diagnostic procedure about autism, because obviously a diagnosis is good for treatment ... in certain domains of what academically counts as medicine, treatment is not actually so likely to be a real benefit.

0:39 Plus, and here your misassessment of her position overlaps very much with misassessments of YEC, you think that if there is a collective blind spot, it is due to a conspiracy by people about the moral level of Dr. Mabuse.

How about prejudice rather than lies? How about conniving with people boosting your prejudice rather than conspiring elaborately with people who would have no chance of maintaining the prejudice other than by very illegal means being secretly employed?

So, no, your pseudo-empathy is definitely about as gross as Mr. Trump's when he recommended anger management classes about a Miss Thunberg who is visibly a very composed and usually pretty smiling person.

0:44 As you mentioned industry, I do think the carbon scare is a conspiratorial deflection from real environmental issues with the industry.

Dupond and teflon production? Don't get me wrong, teflon itself is safe, if you ingest it, it will get through your bowels, it's too big to get into your blood stream. I mean another molecule that is also built on Fluorine tied to Carbon, much smaller, and actually different molecules. "C-8 is dangerous" -- "ah, there are no studies saying C-6 is dangerous" ... those short molecules can get into the bloodstream, do accumulate, are not digested, do cause cancer.

And they hid facts as long as they legally could from Rob Bilott, the lawyer of a farmer whose cows were going bad, close to that factory.

On that level of capitalists, yes, there are conspiracies.

1:09 You even garble the facts.

Fridays for the Future started 20 augusti 2018. ("augusti" is Swedish for August).

"Greta Tintin Eleonora Ernman Thunberg, född 3 januari 2003"


So, the actual age when the Climate Strike started was 15 years, 7 months, 17 days.

"i Stockholm"


Oops, my bad. I had recently qualified her as from Gothenburg, because my own maritime relatives being from there.

Now, returning to you, if someone takes a girl aged nearly 16 and describes her as 13, what does that say about one's attitude to that girl?

Now, it was only "15 mars 2019" that the strike became global. By then Miss Thunberg was 16 years, 2 months, 12 days.

She only appeared in Lausanne at a conference 5 Aug 2019. 16 years, 7 months, 2 days.

That's the real age for what you consider a "girl of 13" ... when she came up with "how dare you" she was not expecting to be listened to, or not more than half, that's why she was somewhat less smiling than recently.

1:16 Confused and a bit autistic ... the only diagnosis that's actually given is "a bit autistic" (Asperger, back when that was a diagnosis).

13 in Lausanne, you are confused about her actual age.

1:32 How much of a backwater is Canada really?

What she said was totally mainstream. Especially in Europe.

As to your total ineptitude about the mother (an opera singer who couldn't function in the environment of Swedish opera by being a domineering fringe parent), it matches your ineptitude about European affairs and about Miss Thunberg's year of birth (unless it was you found Lausanne conference as being "ten years ago" due to things before Covid seeming long ago, now).

2:03 Environmental and economic ...

No, you are inept again. To Thunberg, as to most Swedes, and indeed to all, in a sufficient pinch, environment trumps economy.

The difference is, if the environment is destroyed, there is no economy (total good sense, as far as that goes, not necessarily agreeing with her example back then), there are two reactions to that.

"Well, my good sense about the economy says, we can't assume the environment is an urgency"
"You can't eat money or drink crypto-money"

That's the whole point about the confrontation back then. And that is why her "authority" about economy was never the issue in the first place. That you think it is, clearly lowers your credibility.

I can give climate sceptics the benefit of the doubt that she may have been wrong about what carbon in the atmosphere would do. But I can't give an economist the benefit of the doubt, if she was right on climate science, that we can still wait, because the economy demands it.

And her take on climate science, over here in Europe, it's not the take of fringe parents, it's exactly what they teach in public education. It's not what you get from a parent who's worried the Antichrist will appear in a few years, it's what you get from teachers making fun of that parent and pitying that child for too domineering parents.

2:37 If Greta Thunberg got a diagnosis, it's because her mother was the very opposite of a fringe mother like that of, I presume, Amala Ekpunobi (sorry in advance if I got that wrong).

Greta's parents thought that psychology and psychiatry could be trusted, and had no problem letting her go to the examinations.

[Tried to add]

Here is how PragerU characterises Amala Ekpunobi:

Raised in a far-left activist household, Amala Ekpunobi was once a student organizer for the left.


In Sweden, no one in his right mind would take the Thunberg family as far left.

No one. In 2020, she was guest chief editor of Dagens Nyheter.

Political alignment: Independent liberal.

By the way, it's owned by the Bonnier concern, which is the Swedish equivalent of the Springer concern. The Bonnier family seems to have an ancestor on the Jewish cemetery of Copenhagen. If you are far left or Antisemite, you don't get even a Letter to an editor through in DN, let alone have them make you visiting chief editor for one day.

And you also don't get that position by being incompetent and fear driven.


3:00 So, Ekpunobi is also mischaracterising the age of Greta when the School strike started? Or especially when they started getting traction (Schwartzy was not a world leader in 2018, that's only 2019, Lausanne, and by then Schwartzy gained as much from her as she did in visibility before the public eye).

3:25 So, not being "able to question oneself" is being in an awful situation?

Like, what happened to Jordan's view on boldness being a good thing for society? Now suddenly everyone is supposed to tie themselves into knots and question themselves, a bit like sessions of autocriticism in the Chinese Reeducation camps ...

Or is that just a case of "we want boldness on our side, but for the other side we teach diffidence"?

4:33 To their "prideful narcissism" ...

A Prot said "prideful" and a Shrink said "narcissism" in the same breath.

Narcissism is not a scientific diagnosis, it's a moral evaluation of someone as "prideful" ... it is often enough handled by people who have Protestant or Jewish definitions about what is prideful.

But the actual criteria of what's supposed to be scientific do not match the correct and Catholic definitions of what is pride.

4:33 bis.

The invitation to change the world is actually not just behinds lots of activism, but also behind lots of industrialism, and lots of war crimes.

Some people both in 1945 and right now think they are conducting a war to make the world a place with no more antisemitism ever. That's changing the world.

Teflon started out as an asset for building bombs (changing the world, again!) and ended up as an asset for kitchens, making mums less overworked (changing the world, again!).

But somehow, the only ones who are "prideful" or "narcissists" depending on whether you put the Protestant hat on or the Psychologist hat on are activists. Because industrialists, politicians, militaries, that's the kind of people you just don't attack.

5:04 Catch 22. Someone advocates for some oppressed group.

Are you part of it?

If not, did they elect you?

If yes, aren't you pleading your own cause (I know some Americans have trouble with that, they got disgusted with Dickens* for thinking himself wronged and complaining)?

And by the way, if you are, how about oppressing you some more so you can't be heard?

I haven't read that novel. As it happens, I don't have all that much sympathy either for pretending to be insane or for shirking your duty as a soldier. But the kind of set-up that's characterised by the novel title, it can't be unlearned how awkward that is.

6:18 "understand the world and their place in it?"

There are lots of young people who have a place in it they have good reasons to prefer changing over understanding. Some who are not so young too.

Understanding one's place in the world is usually synonym to someone in an underdog position prevented from independence "understanding" how it still makes perfect sense.

There were bank robber victims in Norrmalmstorg, in Stockholm, who understood their place on the floor, because they understood the bank robber.

So, lack of Stockholm syndrome = lack of interest in understanding things?

I think it's a very solid understanding of things, perhaps misapplied due to mainstream climate science, that without environment, economy makes no sense.

And apart from from the question on carbon emissions, and not being a Fundie Catholic, Thunberg has a story of understanding the world. 2014–2015 (when she was 11-12) she was in Vi i Femman. A Swedish quiz programme. Not the place you land if you are all action and no reflection.

[To be continued?]

* Sourced, Chesterton's biography of Charles Dickens.

No, Adam Had No Human and No Sub-Human Parents And Aliens Are Probably Not an Option


Does Believing in Aliens Undermine Christianity?
Brian Holdsworth | 7 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPrXqHlOP6s


[On Brian's suggestions about a Tolkien scenario]


5:55 Numenoreans aren't paradisal.

More like pious (and later on less pious) descendants of Seth, except their lifespans better match post-Flood patriarchs.

If you think of the Deluge as "large-regional" or "continental" rather than global, one could even compare Elendil, Anarion and Isildur to Noah and his sons.

Obviously not a good idea to deny the world was global, but still.

[Back to my first comment, with ensuing debate]


1:57 Suspecting a holy bishop, subsequently canonised, of heresy because one of his terms was misread as implying parallel humanities is not a formal pronouncement?

I'm from Vienna, birth and parts of my childhood, and in Salzburg, close by, I participated in the Rosary for the first time in my life, more than a year before my conversion.

One holy bishop of Salzburg was St.Virgil.

And once the then Pope asked him to clear himself of heresy. The reason was he had used the term antipodes. Now, St. Virgil just meant a place such that, were you moved there, your feet would point in the exact opposite direction. For Salzburg, that would be 47°48′0″N 13°2′0″E, that's Salzburg itself, the Antipode would be 47°48′0″S 166°58'0"W. (It's in the Ocean East of New Zealand, by the way, so if you stand there, you are probably on a boat).

But the Pope took it as meaning people living there, and as back then the consensus was that stretch couldn't be crossed, somewhere West of the British Isles, that would to the spontaneous reaction imply a parallel humanity, one not descending from Adam via Noah.

Again, part of what Giordano Bruno was burned on the stake for believing was parallel humanities in "other worlds" (meaning "on exoplanets" and possibly "on other planets of the Solar system"). If a man who as Inquisitor delivers someone to burning on the stake, either he's a pretty poor Inquisitor, which St. Robert Bellarmine was not, or he's right, parallel humanities are wrong.

Ante 397
@ante3979
The two cases are not quite relevant for this discussion. The reason why the belief in the existence of people on the antipodes in the case of st. Virgil was such a problem is that it implied the existence of other humans (!) that would not have been the descendants of Adam. And those humans could not have possibly descended from Adam because an aristotelian-ptolemaic view of Earth postulated that the equatorial regions could not be crossed by humans due to their inhospitability. The question about the existence of humans that are not descended from Adam is distinct from the question about the possibility of other non-human yet rational (!) beings who are not descended from Adam and who have not fallen due to the sin of Adam or who might not have been fallen in the first place.

Also, according to Bruno scholars such as Blum, Martinez etc the more important propositions that got him killed were those about the Holy Spirit being a World-soul that quite literally animates the planet Earth, and the plurality of worlds containing inhabitans being not merely metaphysicaly possibile (as Oresme and Cusa believed who were not only not persecuted for such believes but who held high church offices) but a necessary effect emanatong from God's nature, which would negate God's freedom and (to a certain extent) His omnipotence. His belief in the transmigration of souls was also essentialy tied to his belief in the plurality of inhabited worlds. Schoppe (being close to the curia at the time) while writing to a lutheran about Bruno's demise, calles him a simonian while mentioning his belief in the plurality of worlds. And it was believed at the time that the simonian worldview held to the transmigration of souls. Mercati also mentions his belief in the worlds necessarily containing inhabitans.

Again, neither case is relevant for the possibility of aliens in the contemporary context devoid of any theological presumptions about their nature and status within the created order. At the end of the day I find the belief in aliens to be nonsensical for other reasons than it being theologicaly problematic....

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@hglundahl
@ante3979 "other humans (!) that would not have been the descendants of Adam."

That's pretty equivalent to non-human rational creatures in bodies.

By the way, I hope you abstain from Swamidass' position about "people outside Eden" ...

Ante 397
@hglundahl well, not quite. There is certainly a distinction between beings with a human nature (who would need to be descended from Adam due to their humanity) and beings that don't have a human nature but whose nature is just of a rational kind (like in the case of angels) or of a rational as well as corporeal kind (like the one aliens, or mythological creatures of old, would have if they existed).

I don't think that Swamidass' view is compatible with the traditional and imho biblical position on the fall. It never made any sense to me for various reasons and to hold it one would need to explain the reality of suffering and death among non-edenic humans prior to Adam's fall without engaging in some pretty ad hoc "philosophysing"......

I myself hold that all humans descent from Adam, either via an ex nihilo act of creation or Bonnett's view of ad nuovo descent from irrational hominids. I am not a YEC but I firmly hold to a historical first human pair whom all humans arw descented from.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@ante3979 "or Bonnett's view of ad nuovo descent from irrational hominids."

So, one baby Adam was human, but was born to a couple of irrational beings?

How is that not child abuse on God's part?

Or, if he became human only on reaching physical adulthood ... how was it not abusive that he recalled a life as basically, though with human anatomy, an ape? Or if he didn't recall it, how was memory privation not an act of overreach to an as yet unfallen man?

Ante 397
@hglundahl I don't see how this would be abusive since by growing up Adam would progressively be aware of his uniqueness and would walk his own path as any other adult human being (the difference being that he would have a more direct experience of God and that he would have preternatural gifts that his descendants would lack after the fall), but again, this is just one option, Adam could have been created ex nihilo or one could hold to the ensolment view etc. That's realy not that relevant for the discussion at hand....

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@ante3979 If his parents were not human, they could not transmit human language to Adam.

He would have been a feral child.

"the difference being that he would have a more direct experience of God"

Being an image of God and having an experience of God are two different things.

Not being an image of God doesn't mean being a Disney cartoon character with some very clear humanity (sometimes shining through animality), it means not being able to think and to speak.

Check out on what happens to feral children who, during the months when they should acquire a native language, or start the process, are instead raised by wolves or apes or monkeys. They don't learn how to talk by being restored to human society. They have a condition which could only have been merited by the fact that Adam already has sinned.

And if you think otherwise of non-humans with human anatomy, you are not taking seriously that Adam is the first man.

Ante 397
@hglundahl 1) why would his parents need to transmit to Adam a human language? In this scenario Adam could have concepts and linguistical skills inherent to his unfallen nature as much as if he were created as an adult ex nihilo, ir God might intervene in this regard.

2) I never said that having an experience of God and being created in His image are the same thing. The former is a phenomenological, the latter an ontological category that grounds the former. I assumed that Adam was the bearer of God's image, I merely made an oversimplified distinction between his pre-fall state and our current state, hence I don't see the need for your note in this regard.

3) The characteristics of feral children would not apply to Adam in this proposed scenario bc feral children in virtue of either being in a fallen state or in virtue of them lacking the intrinsic capacity to themselves actualise their own development of linguistic and conceptual skills are dependent on socialisation in this regard. Adam would have preternatural gifts in this scenario as much as in the scenario where God creates him ex nihilo, not to mention that God could intervene in this regard.

Again, I never said I believe that Adam was created in this way. I am merely not excluding it as a possibility, noting that there are other possibilies, even more plausible ones, than that.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@ante3979 I don't think there are "other more plausible ones" apart from Adam created as adult with God infusing the knowledge of language.

"In this scenario Adam could have concepts and linguistical skills inherent to his unfallen nature as much as if he were created as an adult ex nihilo"

An adult created ex nihilo would need infused knowledge and skills.

So, Adam didn't start to speak because God gave him linguistic skills and an as yet unfallen nature, but because on top of that, God gave him infused direct knowledge of language.

It's not because we are fallen, it's because we are born, that we need to learn language at a certain age after birth.

As a child, one is dependent, and needs some kind of harmony with one's group, and being able to speak while having no one to speak to, well, that's again something which I consider child abuse.

"I merely made an oversimplified distinction between his pre-fall state and our current state,"

I mistook your distinction for that between his pre-fall state and the state of his non-human relatives.

While I misrepresented you, I think there legitimately are people who think this is what "Adam's being in God's image" meant by contrast with "people outside the Garden" in Swamidass' scenario.

"feral children in virtue of either being in a fallen state or in virtue of them lacking the intrinsic capacity to themselves actualise their own development of linguistic and conceptual skills are dependent on socialisation in this regard."

Feral children occur because we are fallen. Adam as UNFALLEN lacked the capacity to himself actualise the development of linguistic and conceptual skills from a lack of language, and Adam as UNFALLEN depended on God (who from eternity spoke The Word) being his very first socialisation.

The naming of the animals only could occur after Adam had already spoken with God.

"as much as in the scenario where God creates him ex nihilo"

The charism of infused language is not a preternatural gift, and whether God intervened or there was a preternatural gift, for baby Adam to enjoy this, surrounded by beings which did not, it would have been a ruinous strain on his natural love of self and of close ones, because they would have been, objectively, in conflict.

God doesn't intervene with a miracle in order to have to intervene with a second, third or even fourth one to make it work. He's not a Doctor of Medicine, they sometimes do that, create problems when trying to solve them.

Given that Adam was the first real man, and given that he could not be exposed to suffering before sinning, the only miracle that creates no problems to be solved by other miracles would be the one described in the Bible: created as adult ex nihilo, and infused with language.