Tuesday, October 31, 2023

End Times?


Here are two videos with this in mind, with my comments.

Is the Antichrist in Jerusalem, RIGHT NOW?
Joe McClane, 13 Oct. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PNEJ4Ffadc


0:27 My hopes are for the Yanuka to convert.

I don't think he's the Antichrist.

Remember Yitshaak Kaduri.

1:36 Deceive even the elect.

In order for the Yanuka to fulfil this, one would need to suppose nearly all of the elect are inside or very close to Judaism.

Take a look at someone who's generally admired by Christians.

2:17 "He has not claimed it yet"

Neither did Yitshaak Kaduri.

"performed many miracles"

So did Yitshaak Kaduri, and his last words are answering who the Messiah is, by an anagram spelling out Yeshua.

3:18 I think there was a Yanuka who was proficient by age twelve and surprised the learned in a still standing temple.

He's my hope that this Yanuka will not be the Antichrist.

6:10 Could St. Timothy have been another Yanuka, and could he have made miracles prior to St. Paul converting him?

II Tim 3:

15 And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy scriptures, which can instruct thee to salvation, by the faith which is in Christ Jesus

16 All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice, 17 That the man of God may be perfect, furnished to every good work.

[16] "All scripture,": Every part of divine scripture is certainly profitable for all these ends. But, if we would have the whole rule of Christian faith and practice, we must not be content with those Scriptures, which Timothy knew from his infancy, that is, with the Old Testament alone: nor yet with the New Testament, without taking along with it the traditions of the apostles, and the interpretation of the church, to which the apostles delivered both the book, and the true meaning of it.


8:30 A certain man reputed to be Orthodox Christian, who has more in common with Kirill than just that, had a mother named Shelomova in maiden name?

I don't know where Taylor Marshall gets it from the Antichrist will be born in fornication.

I know a prophecy from St. Bridget he'll be the son of an apostate bishop (spiritual son of Kirill?) and of a false Jewish virgin (mother Russia losing her innocence in 1917 due to the Jewish part of the nation?). But that by itself does not spell out direct fornication in the conception.

9:20 I think Taylor Marshall is conflating his own interpretations with the actual texts of the prophecies.

"From a modest nation" — I think this means ...

And after friendships, he will deal deceitfully with him: and he shall go up, and shall overcome with a small people.
[Daniel 11:23]

Doesn't necessarily mean he will be a citizen of that small people.

"he willfeign himself as the leader of the Covenant" — I think this means

And he shall confirm the covenant with many, in one week: and in the half of the week the victim and the sacrifice shall fail: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and the desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.
[Daniel 9:27]

However, in this case Taylor Marshall is following a Protestant reading of this.

In Catholic exegesis, confirming a covenant with many refers to Jesus doing so at the Last Supper.

11:36 Perhaps millions of Orthodox Russians and Catholic Mexicans and Protestant Germans, Scandinavians, English becoming Atheists ....

In this context, the stats I see for Christianity are still lower for Russia than for Ukraine.

They have risen, I think my memory is correct.

12:17 You can't call him a pretender Messiah if he did not claim that title...

12:33 If he had made the disparaging comparison with Jesus himself, that would obviously be a bad sign, but since he hasn't made the claim, that's unlikely.

19:04 Taylor Marshall considers he will be in the "Third Temple" (if that's ever built).

Dimond Brothers consider the main Temple of God in the New Testament era is St.Peter's Basilica.

Both would kind of fit the Biblical prophecy, but only in so far as first being a temple of God, which we know of St. Peter's in Rome, but can suspect is not the case with a rebuilt temple under non-Christian precepts.

Pope Francis JUST REVEALS The Antichrist Has ARRIVED!
Nature Discoveries, 22 Oct. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLRJB3Sv6iU


9:16 I'd agree that Antichrist's Empire is a revived version of some kind of Roman Empire — but which one?

Not Caesarian Rome, since I have held that the Caesar's are (each in turn, with few exceptions like Nero and Joseph II) "ho katekhon" (The Holy Spirit could be "to katekhon" since in Greek He is "To Hagion Pneuma", while it is "ho katekhon" which is taken out of the way, which I think happened in 1918).

Both Antiochus Epiphanes and Pompey came to the Holy Land as representatives of the Senatorial Republican Empire.

Its Antimonarchic slant really made it different from the previous kingdoms. It once or even twice got laws from ten kings ruling together, Decemviri legibus faciundis.

9:53 Revived Senatorial Empire : the rise of Republics from 1776 and 1789 to 1848 and 1917 ...

With a prequel in Cromwell, whose Calvinist spirituality very well fits my view of the Leopard Beast. Kaiaphas, Mohammed, Calvin, Desaguyliers. Jews, Muslims, Puritans, Freemasons.

One can say this rise of the Republics also corresponds to the taking away of three horns — Caesar, Constantine, Charlemagne, for instance.

11:08 Relying on social media or wiki is not taking one's views from AI. The information is still produced by real men of flesh and blood.

I do not do ChatGTP.

15:21 As some are vessels of the Holy Spirit.

This is why "ho katekhon" can't be He, He is not taken out of the way.

No comments: