Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Sharing Against Florida Amendment 4, bis


Sharing Against Florida Amendment 4 · Sharing Against Florida Amendment 4, bis

Apart from misuing the term Fascist, and from one more detail, our abolitionist friend is right:

"Anti-Fascist" Tries To Shut Down Free Speech!
Abolitionists Rising | 27 Nov. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYcLaiRfmFE


18:52 The guy is actually relying on Jews.

A certain Orthodox Rabbi, whose comment on contraception turned my stomach, Shmuley Boteakh, made me see what some people mean when they talk about "Judeo-Satanism" ...

Now, he was for the pill, which in some cases prevents conception, but also in other cases kills the already conceived embryo by ejecting it, that's why I find him disgusting.

However, pertinent for the discussion, Shmuley is actually pro-gay. He's telling gay couples things like "you are refusing two of the 613 commandments, like marrying and having children, but hey, there are 611 other ones" ...

Meaning, if he had been right on what the Torah commanded of each Israelite, Our Lord would have been a sinner or He would have had to intend to marry later at least, if He hadn't been crucified.

I suppose this refers to:

Lest the possession of the children of Israel be mingled from tribe to tribe. For all men shall marry wives of their own tribe and kindred:
[Numbers 36:7]


As a Christian, I take it as a restriction on whom one was as an Israelite in the OT allowed to marry (none outside the tribe or section of the tribe, even, cousin marriages preferred). I also take this as a restriction on marriage:

It behoveth therefore a bishop to be blameless, the husband of one wife, sober, prudent, of good behaviour, chaste, given to hospitality, a teacher,
[1 Timothy 3:2]


But some guys take it as an actual command or precondition to get or be married. Like, you know, Jews and Protestants. Some of them go so far as to speak of celibate men as gay. Those guys have been trying to get me out of Catholicism to get me a non-Catholic wife. Meanwhile, some Catholic evildoers have been telling themselves and each other that my repeated desire to get married, and therefore to get an income on what I write, is just my capitulation to Jews and Protestants, which is not the case.

20:00 I actually do know Margeritas ante porcas. [or ante porcos] Sometimes I actually do make a Bible search in Latin rather than English, because it's a phrase I know by heart ....

For Tyndale and Wycliff, Latin was actually the direct original, but making this into the Vulgate being THE original Bible is over the top.

He was probably raised by somewhat machist and not too well educated Catholics, whose machism probably has as much if not more than his genes to do with what you probably consider his predisposition.

Or the machism may come from Calvinist acquaintances later ...




Don't let this stop you from enjoying the egregious idea of the Anti-Fascist Economy Student that someone's individual DNA came into existence at his mother's and at his father's conception, but not at his own ... the spermatozoon load of DNA he got from his dad was a unique selection of chromosomes his dad had, in some cases crossovers. The ovum load of DNA he got from his mum was a unique selection of chromosomes his mum had. Also there, I think, sometimes with recombinations. With one same dad and one same mum, not counting recombinations, a person can have 223 * 223 different combinations of chromosomes. Each of us really has his DNA from the moment of conception. In some cases, with homozygotic twins, his individual being came into being somewhat later, by a division of the original embryo, God knowing which of the homozygotic twins had the original soul and which one had his soul created somewhat later.




This does not exonerate the Catholics who pretend that my own (consistent and fully intended) preference was celibacy and that any desire of me to marry must come from Jews, Protestants or the perversion of pornography.

No comments: